Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Map arm64 architecture to aarch64 #309

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 9, 2020
Merged

Conversation

jaymalasinha
Copy link

@jaymalasinha jaymalasinha commented Mar 9, 2020

Ubuntu nodes map architecutre uname -i to aarch64 and dpkg --print-architecture to arm64 so we need this mapping reflect here

Signed-off-by: Jaymala Sinha jsinha@chef.io

Ubuntu nodes map architecutre uname -i to aarch64 and dpkg --print-architecture to arm64 so we need this mapping reflect here

Description

Map arm64 architecture to aarch64

Related Issue

Types of changes

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
  • Chore (non-breaking change that does not add functionality or fix an issue)

Checklist:

  • I have read the CONTRIBUTING document.
  • I have run the pre-merge tests locally and they pass.
  • I have updated the documentation accordingly.
  • I have added tests to cover my changes.
  • All new and existing tests passed.
  • All commits have been signed-off for the Developer Certificate of Origin.

Ubuntu nodes map architecutre `uname -i` to aarch64 and `dpkg --print-architecture` to arm64 so we need this mapping reflect here

Signed-off-by: Jaymala Sinha <jsinha@chef.io>
@jaymalasinha jaymalasinha requested review from a team as code owners March 9, 2020 19:12
@tas50 tas50 merged commit c795650 into master Mar 9, 2020
@chef-expeditor chef-expeditor bot deleted the jsinha/add_arm64_mapping branch March 9, 2020 19:19
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants