Branch coverage support #18
Comments
robotdana
added a commit
to robotdana/simplecov-console
that referenced
this issue
Nov 3, 2020
This will only show if simlpecov is recording branch coverage, otherwise the output is unchanged The output does look kinda awkward and busy, but all i care about is actually being able to see output from CI without having to set up some kind of artifact hosting for the coverage/index.html fixes: chetan#18 example output: Passing: ``` COVERAGE: 100.00% -- 1743/1743 lines in 108 files BRANCH COVERAGE: 100.00% -- 434/434 branches in 108 branches ``` Failing (block format): ``` COVERAGE: 100.00% -- 1743/1743 lines in 108 files BRANCH COVERAGE: 99.77% -- 434/435 branches in 108 branches file: lib/leftovers/config_validator/error_processor.rb coverage: 100.00% (96/96 lines) missed: branches: 96.97% (32/33 branches) missed: 112[else] ``` Failing (table format): ``` COVERAGE: 100.00% -- 1743/1743 lines in 108 files BRANCH COVERAGE: 99.77% -- 434/435 branches in 108 branches +----------+---------------------------------------------------+-------+--------+---------+-----------------+----------+-----------------+------------------+ | coverage | file | lines | missed | missing | branch coverage | branches | branches missed | branches missing | +----------+---------------------------------------------------+-------+--------+---------+-----------------+----------+-----------------+------------------+ | 100.00% | lib/leftovers/config_validator/error_processor.rb | 96 | 0 | | 96.97% | 33 | 1 | 112[else] | +----------+---------------------------------------------------+-------+--------+---------+-----------------+----------+-----------------+------------------+ ```
|
@rmacklin just pushed v0.8 with branch support. Let me know if you see any issues |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
simplecovsupports measuring branch coverage in addition to line coverage:https://github.com/simplecov-ruby/simplecov/tree/818bc2547842a90c607b4fec834320766a8686de#branch-coverage-ruby--25
It seems like this formatter currently displays line coverage results but not branch coverage results. Would it be valuable to explicitly mention this in the README? Or, have you thought about supporting branch coverage?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: