Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add more information when probe types don't match #4269

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 10, 2024

Conversation

mwachs5
Copy link
Contributor

@mwachs5 mwachs5 commented Jul 10, 2024

Contributor Checklist

  • Did you add Scaladoc to every public function/method?
  • Did you add at least one test demonstrating the PR?
  • Did you delete any extraneous printlns/debugging code?
  • Did you specify the type of improvement?
  • Did you add appropriate documentation in docs/src?
  • Did you request a desired merge strategy?
  • Did you add text to be included in the Release Notes for this change?

Type of Improvement

  • Feature (or new API)

Desired Merge Strategy

  • Squash: The PR will be squashed and merged (choose this if you have no preference).

Release Notes

Add more information to the error message when attempting to probe.define to a mismatched chisel type.

Reviewer Checklist (only modified by reviewer)

  • Did you add the appropriate labels? (Select the most appropriate one based on the "Type of Improvement")
  • Did you mark the proper milestone (Bug fix: 3.6.x, 5.x, or 6.x depending on impact, API modification or big change: 7.0)?
  • Did you review?
  • Did you check whether all relevant Contributor checkboxes have been checked?
  • Did you do one of the following when ready to merge:
    • Squash: You/ the contributor Enable auto-merge (squash), clean up the commit message, and label with Please Merge.
    • Merge: Ensure that contributor has cleaned up their commit history, then merge with Create a merge commit.

@mwachs5 mwachs5 added the Feature New feature, will be included in release notes label Jul 10, 2024
@mwachs5 mwachs5 added this to the 6.x milestone Jul 10, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@jackkoenig jackkoenig left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks great!

@jackkoenig jackkoenig merged commit 029254a into main Jul 10, 2024
18 checks passed
@jackkoenig jackkoenig deleted the probe-define-message branch July 10, 2024 18:48
@mergify mergify bot added the Backported This PR has been backported label Jul 10, 2024
mergify bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 10, 2024
chiselbot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 10, 2024
(cherry picked from commit 029254a)

Co-authored-by: Megan Wachs <megan@sifive.com>
@dtzSiFive
Copy link
Member

Awesome, thanks!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Backported This PR has been backported Feature New feature, will be included in release notes
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants