-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 100
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add an Apache v2 License to cChoco #70
Comments
I'd love to set an Apache v2 License on this code, however to move from no license to a license requires a thumbs up from contributors. For every person identified, you must create a comment on this issue so that the licensing can be added. The apache v2 license is super business friendly and can be found at https://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html (it's the same license that Chocolatey uses for all of its open source repositories).
If your name has been identified, please add a comment that says "I agree with a move to Apache v2 licensing for my contributions to this repository." A simple thumbs up will not be enough. |
I agree with a move to Apache v2 licensing for my contributions to this repository. |
I agree with the move to Apache v2 for licensing my contributions to this repository |
I agree with a move to Apache v2 licensing for my contributions to this repository. |
1 similar comment
I agree with a move to Apache v2 licensing for my contributions to this repository. |
I agree with a move to Apache v2 licensing for my contributions to this repository History When I first wrote the resource it was submitted to the powershellorg as a PR to a repo which grouped together lots of community dsc resources and already had a license. @smurawski pulled out the code and committed it to a new repo to make it easier to manage for me and likely that's when we missed the licensing going missing. |
I agree with the move to Apache v2 for licensing my contributions to this repository |
I agree with a move to Apache v2 licensing for my contributions to this repository. |
If we can't get all folks to sign off on this, we will need to rewrite the sections of code that were contributed so we can move forward with the licensing. I'm not keen on that, so hopefully folks are able to agree with the change. |
I agree with a move to Apache v2 licensing for my contributions to this repository. |
I agree with a move to Apache v2 licensing for my contributions to this repository. |
1 similar comment
I agree with a move to Apache v2 licensing for my contributions to this repository. |
And then there were four @mrpullen @RobFaie @kcighon @absolutejam. If anyone knows these folks, can you help me reach out to them? |
I sent an email to @absolutejam as that was listed in James' GitHub profile. |
Mrpullen here.
I agree with a move to Apache v2 Licensing.
Sent from Mail<https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986> for Windows 10
From: Rob Reynolds<mailto:notifications@github.com>
Sent: Tuesday, May 16, 2017 4:36 PM
To: chocolatey/cChoco<mailto:cChoco@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Michael Rees Pullen<mailto:___>; Mention<mailto:mention@noreply.github.com>
Subject: Re: [chocolatey/cChoco] Add an Apache v2 License to cChoco (#70)
And then there were four @mrpullen<https://github.com/mrpullen> @RobFaie<https://github.com/robfaie> @kcighon<https://github.com/kcighon> @absolutejam<https://github.com/absolutejam>. If anyone knows these folks, can you help me reach out to them?
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub<#70 (comment)>, or mute the thread<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AKOTuXfG9Q_2tSUnZ7qife1yG764exU7ks5r6gi0gaJpZM4NA-sC>.
|
Ones we would not necessarily need to rewrite to change the licensing:
However I would really like to get @RobFaie 's signoff - https://github.com/chocolatey/cChoco/commits?author=RobFaie |
@ITGuyOU your commit came after, but would you mind also responding here? |
@mrpullen Thank you! |
Sorry for the inconvenience, I saw this issue had some activity but I didn't realising you were waiting for me! I think it's a great idea to move to the Apache 2 license. 'I agree with a move to Apache v2 licensing for my contributions to this repository.' |
@absolutejam thanks! |
All good with me. |
@RobFaie thanks for that. Is there a chance you could provide the official wording requested? |
I agree with the move to Apache v2 for licensing my contributions to this repository |
Thanks @ITGuyOU ! |
Sorry for the delay, @ferventcoder . I've been hunting for a new employer, which has kept me tied up. |
No worries sir, I did not include your name on this until recently. |
I agree with a move to Apache v2 licensing for my contributions to this repository. |
1 similar comment
I agree with a move to Apache v2 licensing for my contributions to this repository. |
Apologies for delayed response - I agree with a move to Apache v2 licensing for my contributions to this repository. |
I agree with a move to Apache v2 licensing for my contributions to this
repository.
…On Wed, Jun 21, 2017, 13:52 J. ***@***.***> wrote:
Apologies for delayed response - I agree with a move to Apache v2
licensing for my contributions to this repository.
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#70 (comment)>,
or mute the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AUry6h4gaoTJ8pr1HLPJ_40ngC381tX2ks5sGYKkgaJpZM4NA-sC>
.
|
Apply Apache v2 licensing to the repository - received sign off from all current contributors.
Apache v2 licensing has been applied. Thanks all!! |
* development: (GH-71) Implemented cChocoFeature (GH-87) Moved to using reduced output (maint) formatting (GH-70) Apply Apache v2 Licensing (GH-85) Pass the source to cChocoPackageInstallerSet correctly (GH-44) Pass the Source to choco correctly Added version to example (GH-77) Push to gallery on new tags (maint) formatting (GH-72) PowerShell scripts in format for signing
…ages_for_faster_run * development: (chocolateyGH-87) Moved to using reduced output (maint) formatting (chocolateyGH-70) Apply Apache v2 Licensing (chocolateyGH-85) Pass the source to cChocoPackageInstallerSet correctly (chocolateyGH-44) Pass the Source to choco correctly Added version to example (chocolateyGH-77) Push to gallery on new tags (maint) formatting (chocolateyGH-72) PowerShell scripts in format for signing # Conflicts: # DSCResources/cChocoPackageInstall/cChocoPackageInstall.psm1
Howdy @chocolatey/powershelldsc - What was the original intent for licensing here?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: