Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat(clerk-expo): Support swapping publishableKey at runtime #1655
feat(clerk-expo): Support swapping publishableKey at runtime #1655
Changes from 1 commit
46d14e7
4d0ecef
5150098
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is specified as a public readonly property, but we weren't setting it anywhere.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm almost sure this is not used anywhere - @panteliselef , any chance this is needed by the multidomains feature?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm using it in another spot in this PR to check for a new key, but let me know if we don't want to set this for some reason!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
❓I think that there is
publishableKey
and notkey
prop inClerkReactProvider
. Could we double check this?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The use of key here is intentional to force react to remount the component and wipe away any stale state from the previous instance. As far as I can tell, by passing the clerk instance below we remove the need to pass the publishableKey as a prop
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Without this change, there was no way to forcibly reset the created
IsomorphicClerk
instance. Given that we have not considered the possibility of changing the instance ofClerk
at runtime, adding this additional check seems reasonable given the new requirement.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This makes sense 👍🏻