apps: Implement mutual tls with optional strict trust #1855
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
nnathan
force-pushed
the
implement_mutual_tls
branch
from
8e3b787
to
843e78e
Compare
nnathan
force-pushed
the
implement_mutual_tls
branch
from
843e78e
to
74ade4a
Compare
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Hi,
I'm looking at using QUIC for doing mutual TLS. It took me awhile to figure out even though it's rather easy to implement. I first reached for the ssl context builder toolbox because I thought that might be required, but I eventually landed on a few simple additions to the client & server.
Includes everything from #1854 .