Mergify #862
Mergify #862
Conversation
📝 Walkthrough📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThis pull request introduces modular configuration enhancements across the project's GitHub workflow and Atmos configuration. The changes include extending the Mergify configuration, adding a new Changes
Suggested labels
Possibly related PRs
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
examples/tests/atmos.yaml (1)
96-97: Consider adding error handling to the test command.The current implementation could benefit from basic error handling and status reporting.
Consider this enhancement:
steps: - - atmos vendor pull + - | + if ! atmos vendor pull; then + echo "Error: Vendor pull failed" + exit 1 + fi
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
.github/mergify.yml(1 hunks).github/workflows/test.yml(1 hunks)examples/tests/atmos.yaml(2 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- .github/mergify.yml
🔇 Additional comments (2)
.github/workflows/test.yml (1)
249-249: LGTM! Addition of tests demo folder.
The addition of "tests" to the matrix is well-structured and consistent with other demo folders.
Let's verify the tests folder structure:
✅ Verification successful
Folder structure for tests demo looks good!
The tests demo folder follows the standard structure with all expected directories:
- components/
- modules/
- rootfs/
- stacks/
- vendor/
This matches the organization pattern used across other demo folders.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Verify the existence and structure of the tests folder
fd . examples/tests --type d --max-depth 1
Length of output: 164
examples/tests/atmos.yaml (1)
93-98: LGTM! Well-structured test command.
The test command is simple, focused, and follows the command structure pattern used throughout the file.
Let's verify the vendor configuration:
✅ Verification successful
Vendor configuration is properly set up and supports the test command
The vendor.yaml file is well-configured with:
- Multiple components tagged with 'test'
- Clear source definitions and targets
- Proper import configurations
The atmos vendor pull command in the test task will pull all vendored components, which is appropriate for testing purposes.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for vendor configuration files
fd vendor.yaml examples/tests --type f
Length of output: 67
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the content of vendor.yaml to verify configuration
cat examples/tests/vendor.yaml
Length of output: 4496
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
.github/CODEOWNERS (1)
7-7: Default ownership change strengthens review controlsRemoving
@cloudposse/contributorsfrom the default ownership pattern (*) establishes a more controlled review process by limiting it to the engineering team. This aligns with security best practices by ensuring core changes are reviewed by team members with deeper context.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
.github/CODEOWNERS(2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
.github/CODEOWNERS (1)
18-21: Streamlined ownership for critical files maintains strong controls
The ownership updates for Terraform (**/*.tf) and documentation files maintain strong controls by:
- Keeping both engineering and approvers teams as reviewers
- Removing the broader contributors team
- Ensuring consistent ownership across related file types (README.yaml, README.md, docs/*.md)
This change establishes a clear two-tier review process while maintaining security for infrastructure and documentation changes.
Let's verify the completeness of the file patterns:
✅ Verification successful
File patterns in CODEOWNERS provide comprehensive coverage
The verification confirms that the CODEOWNERS patterns effectively cover all Terraform and documentation files:
**/*.tfpattern covers all discovered Terraform files across the repositoryREADME.yaml,README.md, anddocs/*.mdpatterns collectively cover:- All markdown files in the docs directory
- All README files at various levels
- Component documentation files (*.yaml)
The patterns ensure proper ownership and review requirements for all infrastructure and documentation files.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for any Terraform or documentation files that might not be covered by the current patterns
# Find all Terraform files
echo "Checking Terraform files..."
fd -e tf
# Find all documentation files
echo "Checking documentation files..."
fd -e md
fd -e yaml -x grep -l "^kind: Component" {} \; # Find potential component documentation
Length of output: 8246
aknysh
added
the
no-release
|
These changes were released in v1.128.0. |
what
CODEOWNERSso they stop getting spammed on PR reviewswhy
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
mockto the testing workflow, enhancing testing capabilities.atmos.yamlconfiguration.Configuration Changes