Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Work around requirement that objects match exactly #23

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 16, 2021
Merged

Work around requirement that objects match exactly #23

merged 1 commit into from
Apr 16, 2021

Conversation

Nuru
Copy link
Contributor

@Nuru Nuru commented Apr 16, 2021

what

  • Work around requirement that objects match exactly when used in a tertiary conditional expression

why

  • We do not want to predict or limit the structure of a remote state

references

@Nuru Nuru added the bugfix Change that restores intended behavior label Apr 16, 2021
@Nuru Nuru requested a review from aknysh April 16, 2021 04:24
@Nuru Nuru requested review from a team as code owners April 16, 2021 04:24
@Nuru Nuru requested a review from Gowiem April 16, 2021 04:24
@Nuru
Copy link
Contributor Author

Nuru commented Apr 16, 2021

/test all

@Nuru Nuru requested review from osterman and removed request for Gowiem April 16, 2021 04:28
@Nuru Nuru merged commit 3ae9712 into main Apr 16, 2021
@mergify mergify bot deleted the bugfix branch April 16, 2021 04:30
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@aknysh aknysh aknysh approved these changes

@osterman osterman Awaiting requested review from osterman

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
bugfix Change that restores intended behavior
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@Nuru @aknysh