Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
💡 Codebase verification
The bug-version entry is correctly configured and the issue reference should be updated
The downgrade from v0.1.16 to v0.1.12 is correct as issue #9752 confirms that @swc/types versions >= 0.1.13 lack the index.js file, causing module resolution failures. However, the current reference points to issue #9753 which is about a different problem. The entry should reference issue #9752 instead.
🔗 Analysis chain
LGTM! The bug-version entry is correctly configured.
The entry properly specifies the problematic version (0.1.16) and the fallback version (0.1.12), following the established pattern in the file.
Let's verify the referenced issue:
The referenced issue is not related to the missing index.js file
The issue #9753 in the swc-project/swc repository is about a different problem: "Cannot use import statement outside a module" in version 0.1.16. This doesn't match the stated rationale for downgrading to v0.1.12 (missing index.js file).
Let's verify if there are any other relevant issues:
Let's check the content of issue #9752 as it seems more relevant:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
Length of output: 1381
Script:
Length of output: 344
Script:
Length of output: 1831