++i is more gas efficient than i++ for loops.

[code423n4]

Handle

pants

Vulnerability details

At all loops definitions, you used i++ instead ++i although ++i is more gas efficient.
An even better approach is to use unchecked {++i}, since you are using solidity version >=0.8.

[PierrickGT]

I did some gas golfing to figure out if ++i is really less gas consuming than i++. We would only save 5 gas per iteration but also lose in code clarity, so this gas saving trade off isn't really worth it.

About the unchecked part, results are a bit more convincing but still negligible. We would save 77 gas per iteration but as stated in the following issue, it is not possible to write unchecked { ++i } inline so we would have to write a helper function which would make our code less legible and harder to maintain in the future.

ethereum/solidity#10695

I've acknowledged the issue but we won't actually make the changes cause we prefer to keep a simple code base that will be easier to maintain in the future.

[GalloDaSballo]

The sponsor does acknowledge and I agree that the gas savings do not justify for the loss of clarity