Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

An array's length should be cached to save gas in for-loops #194

Closed
code423n4 opened this issue Dec 22, 2021 · 1 comment
Closed

An array's length should be cached to save gas in for-loops #194

code423n4 opened this issue Dec 22, 2021 · 1 comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working duplicate This issue or pull request already exists G (Gas Optimization) resolved Finding has been patched by sponsor (sponsor pls link to PR containing fix) sponsor confirmed Sponsor agrees this is a problem and intends to fix it (OK to use w/ "disagree with severity")

Comments

@code423n4
Copy link
Contributor

Handle

Dravee

Vulnerability details

Impact

Reading array length at each iteration of the loop takes 6 gas (3 for mload and 3 to place memory_offset) in the stack.

Caching the array length in the stack saves around 3 gas per iteration.

Proof of Concept

./NFTXEligibilityManager.sol:85:        for (uint256 i = 0; i < modulesCopy.length; i++) {
./NFTXLPStaking.sol:81:        for (uint256 i = 0; i < vaultIds.length; i++) {
./NFTXLPStaking.sol:206:        for (uint256 i = 0; i < vaultIds.length; i++) {
./NFTXMarketplaceZap.sol:263:    for (uint256 i = 0; i < idsIn.length; i++) {
./NFTXMarketplaceZap.sol:297:    for (uint256 i = 0; i < idsIn.length; i++) {
./NFTXMarketplaceZap.sol:379:    for (uint256 i = 0; i < ids.length; i++) {
./NFTXMarketplaceZap.sol:399:    for (uint256 i = 0; i < ids.length; i++) {
./NFTXMarketplaceZap.sol:414:    for (uint256 i = 0; i < ids.length; i++) {
./NFTXMarketplaceZap.sol:437:    for (uint256 i = 0; i < idsIn.length; i++) {
./NFTXSimpleFeeDistributor.sol:62:    for (uint256 i = 0; i < length; i++) {
./NFTXStakingZap.sol:192:    for (uint256 i = 0; i < tokenIds.length; i++) {
./NFTXStakingZap.sol:203:    for (uint256 i = 0; i < tokenIds.length; i++) {
./NFTXStakingZap.sol:341:    for (uint256 i = 0; i < ids.length; i++) {
./NFTXVaultUpgradeable.sol:267:            for (uint256 i = 0; i < tokenIds.length; i++) {
./NFTXVaultUpgradeable.sol:406:            for (uint256 i = 0; i < tokenIds.length; i++) {
./NFTXVaultUpgradeable.sol:419:            for (uint256 i = 0; i < tokenIds.length; i++) {

Tools Used

VS Code

Recommended Mitigation Steps

Store the array's length in a variable before the for-loop, and use it instead. As an example, it's already done here: https://github.com/code-423n4/2021-12-nftx/blob/main/nftx-protocol-v2/contracts/solidity/NFTXVaultUpgradeable.sol#L362-L364

@code423n4 code423n4 added bug Something isn't working G (Gas Optimization) labels Dec 22, 2021
code423n4 added a commit that referenced this issue Dec 22, 2021
@0xKiwi 0xKiwi added duplicate This issue or pull request already exists resolved Finding has been patched by sponsor (sponsor pls link to PR containing fix) sponsor confirmed Sponsor agrees this is a problem and intends to fix it (OK to use w/ "disagree with severity") labels Jan 5, 2022
@dmvt
Copy link
Collaborator

dmvt commented Mar 11, 2022

duplicate of #198

@dmvt dmvt closed this as completed Mar 11, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working duplicate This issue or pull request already exists G (Gas Optimization) resolved Finding has been patched by sponsor (sponsor pls link to PR containing fix) sponsor confirmed Sponsor agrees this is a problem and intends to fix it (OK to use w/ "disagree with severity")
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants