Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Root delay can be more than 4 weeks #469

Closed
c4-submissions opened this issue Sep 14, 2023 · 3 comments
Closed

Root delay can be more than 4 weeks #469

c4-submissions opened this issue Sep 14, 2023 · 3 comments
Labels
bug Something isn't working downgraded by judge Judge downgraded the risk level of this issue duplicate-298 grade-c low quality report This report is of especially low quality QA (Quality Assurance) Assets are not at risk. State handling, function incorrect as to spec, issues with clarity, syntax

Comments

@c4-submissions
Copy link
Contributor

Lines of code

https://github.com/code-423n4/2023-09-centrifuge/blob/512e7a71ebd9ae76384f837204216f26380c9f91/src/Root.sol#L36

Vulnerability details

Impact

Delay can be set to more than 4 weeks in root.sol

Proof of Concept

When deploying root.sol, delay can be set to more than 4 weeks by mistake

 constructor(address _escrow, uint256 _delay) {
        escrow = _escrow;
        delay = _delay;

        wards[msg.sender] = 1;
        emit Rely(msg.sender);
    }

Tools Used

Manual review

Recommended Mitigation Steps

check if delay is less than weeks in constructor,

 constructor(address _escrow, uint256 _delay) {
        escrow = _escrow;
        require(_delay <  4 weeks,"error")
        delay = _delay;

        wards[msg.sender] = 1;
        emit Rely(msg.sender);
    }

Assessed type

Invalid Validation

@c4-submissions c4-submissions added 2 (Med Risk) Assets not at direct risk, but function/availability of the protocol could be impacted or leak value bug Something isn't working labels Sep 14, 2023
c4-submissions added a commit that referenced this issue Sep 14, 2023
@c4-pre-sort
Copy link

raymondfam marked the issue as low quality report

@c4-pre-sort c4-pre-sort added the low quality report This report is of especially low quality label Sep 15, 2023
@c4-pre-sort
Copy link

raymondfam marked the issue as duplicate of #298

@c4-judge
Copy link

gzeon-c4 changed the severity to QA (Quality Assurance)

@c4-judge c4-judge added downgraded by judge Judge downgraded the risk level of this issue QA (Quality Assurance) Assets are not at risk. State handling, function incorrect as to spec, issues with clarity, syntax and removed 2 (Med Risk) Assets not at direct risk, but function/availability of the protocol could be impacted or leak value labels Sep 25, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working downgraded by judge Judge downgraded the risk level of this issue duplicate-298 grade-c low quality report This report is of especially low quality QA (Quality Assurance) Assets are not at risk. State handling, function incorrect as to spec, issues with clarity, syntax
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants