Multiple end points

[mikexliu]

No description provided.

[coveralls]

Coverage increased (+0.1%) to 88.388% when pulling cf75799 on mikexliu:multiple_end_points into 918201c on codecentric:master.

[mikexliu]

I couldn't think of a case where we would only want to register against exactly one admin-server if there are multiple available. My use case is we have a centralized admin-server but each service also is hosting its own admin-server. I would like to have the data be pushed to both endpoints.

If the centralized admin-server goes down, it's still accessible via the service itself (or if you have multiple dedicated admin-servers, then they would have the data immediately as opposed to having to wait for the next registration).

[coveralls]

Coverage increased (+0.1%) to 88.388% when pulling 793d0ff on mikexliu:multiple_end_points into 918201c on codecentric:master.

[coveralls]

Coverage increased (+0.1%) to 88.388% when pulling 793d0ff on mikexliu:multiple_end_points into 918201c on codecentric:master.

[joshiste]

First of all thank you for the PR.

In my opinion an option spring.boot.admin.register-once with default true for the old behaviour would be good. And I would appreciate if you would sqash all commits into a single one and do a forced push to your branch.

[coveralls]

Coverage increased (+0.1%) to 88.382% when pulling 68d34d1 on mikexliu:multiple_end_points into 918201c on codecentric:master.

[mikexliu]

@joshiste
Thanks. I've squashed it into one commit. The only issue I still have is the return value of register. If you are registering against multiple and some fail, should it still be false or should it be true? Current implementation is true if even one is successful.

[coveralls]

Coverage increased (+0.1%) to 88.382% when pulling 68d34d1 on mikexliu:multiple_end_points into 918201c on codecentric:master.

[coveralls]

Coverage increased (+0.1%) to 88.382% when pulling 68d34d1 on mikexliu:multiple_end_points into 918201c on codecentric:master.

[joshiste]

merged with b0330cd