Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: use Temurin jdk #3199

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 3, 2024
Merged

Conversation

sullis
Copy link
Contributor

@sullis sullis commented Mar 3, 2024

replace 'adopt' with 'temurin'

Note: AdoptOpenJdk is obsolete

@sullis sullis requested a review from a team as a code owner March 3, 2024 18:17
@sullis sullis changed the title use Temurin jdk chore: use Temurin jdk Mar 3, 2024
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Mar 3, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 81.95%. Comparing base (4f9d0ae) to head (e8c924c).
Report is 1196 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##             master    #3199      +/-   ##
============================================
- Coverage     83.64%   81.95%   -1.70%     
- Complexity     1247     1322      +75     
============================================
  Files           156      166      +10     
  Lines          3644     4300     +656     
  Branches        258      283      +25     
============================================
+ Hits           3048     3524     +476     
- Misses          464      633     +169     
- Partials        132      143      +11     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@erikpetzold erikpetzold merged commit d2b36b3 into codecentric:master Mar 3, 2024
1 check passed
@sullis sullis deleted the temurin-jdk-ftw branch March 3, 2024 18:45
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants