Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

docs: update comparison with runtypes #2536

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 31, 2023
Merged

docs: update comparison with runtypes #2536

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion README.md
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -2781,7 +2781,7 @@ This more declarative API makes schema definitions vastly more concise.

[https://github.com/pelotom/runtypes](https://github.com/pelotom/runtypes)

Good type inference support, but limited options for object type masking (no `.pick` , `.omit` , `.extend` , etc.). No support for `Record` s (their `Record` is equivalent to Zod's `object` ). They DO support readonly types, which Zod does not.
Good type inference support. They DO support readonly types, which Zod does not.

- Supports "pattern matching": computed properties that distribute over unions
- Supports readonly types
Expand Down