You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The BSP implementation (which allows editors to talk to mill when the user edits module files) is becoming first-class-citizen in mill, it'd be interesting to piggyback on ammonite's BSP implementation for build.sc, to get all the autocompletion/navigation features metals users would like to have when editing mill build files.
A few possibly relevant details
Mill's entrypoint that ties it to ammonite is there. This method outputs a "Evaluator", which is a construct that is aware of the build-graph and able to evaluate mill-tasks. It is is used by the BSP implementation. The evaluator potentially be accompanied by the information required by ammonite's bsp, in order to enrich mill's bsp for build-files.
One essential thing, specific to mill, that differs from ammonite is the codeWrapper, which would have to be communicated to the ammonite's bsp somehow. The classpath is also obviously different.
@alexarchambault 👋 , could I ask you for a brain-dump when you have time, on how such an integration would be possible ?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
The BSP implementation (which allows editors to talk to mill when the user edits module files) is becoming first-class-citizen in mill, it'd be interesting to piggyback on ammonite's BSP implementation for
build.sc
, to get all the autocompletion/navigation features metals users would like to have when editing mill build files.A few possibly relevant details
Mill's entrypoint that ties it to ammonite is there. This method outputs a "Evaluator", which is a construct that is aware of the build-graph and able to evaluate mill-tasks. It is is used by the BSP implementation. The evaluator potentially be accompanied by the information required by ammonite's bsp, in order to enrich mill's bsp for build-files.
One essential thing, specific to mill, that differs from ammonite is the codeWrapper, which would have to be communicated to the ammonite's bsp somehow. The classpath is also obviously different.
@alexarchambault 👋 , could I ask you for a brain-dump when you have time, on how such an integration would be possible ?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: