-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 51
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat!: Iterator Key()
and Value()
no longer return a copy
#168
Merged
Merged
Changes from 10 commits
Commits
Show all changes
12 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
c6035c9
updated the Iterator interface docs for methods Key() and Value()
alesforz 25a8f7b
changes in goLevelDBIterator Key() impl:
alesforz 25707ab
changes in badgerDBIterator Key() implementation
alesforz 858d1f0
changes in pebbleDBIterator Key() implementation
alesforz 7ed49f2
updated backend tests:
alesforz b73d60d
changes in goLevelDBIterator Value() impl:
alesforz 709efff
updated docs of badgerdb Key() and Value() APIs implementations.
alesforz 8e8fc69
changes in pebbleDBIterator Value() impl:
alesforz fa65ae2
updated the Iterator interface docs for methods Key() and Value()
alesforz 093a554
updated badgerDBIterator docs for the Value() method
alesforz cccfd0d
updated badgerdb Value(), and rocksdb Key() and Value() API docs
alesforz 1841d30
added changelog entry
alesforz File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'd remove these comments.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🤔 I would leave them, because I think they give readers some additional context about the functions.
Granted, in the context of this repo it's clear what the functions refer to.
Still, I would argue it doesn't hurt to leave extra-info in.