Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update cppcheck to 2.10 #15583

Closed
wants to merge 5 commits into from
Closed

Update cppcheck to 2.10 #15583

wants to merge 5 commits into from

Conversation

Sneder89
Copy link
Contributor

@Sneder89 Sneder89 commented Jan 31, 2023

Specify library name and version: lib/1.0


@conan-center-bot

This comment has been minimized.

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Jan 31, 2023

I detected other pull requests that are modifying cppcheck/all recipe:

This message is automatically generated by https://github.com/ericLemanissier/conan-center-conflicting-prs so don't hesitate to report issues/improvements there.

@ghost ghost mentioned this pull request Jan 31, 2023
3 tasks
@conan-center-bot

This comment has been minimized.

@conan-center-bot

This comment has been minimized.

@conan-center-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

Conan v1 pipeline ✔️

All green in build 5 (dae1574fcaaba24851a4e915d088e068976618e1):

  • cppcheck/2.9.3@:
    All packages built successfully! (All logs)

  • cppcheck/2.9.2@:
    All packages built successfully! (All logs)

  • cppcheck/2.8.2@:
    All packages built successfully! (All logs)

  • cppcheck/2.7.5@:
    All packages built successfully! (All logs)

  • cppcheck/2.10.0@:
    All packages built successfully! (All logs)


Conan v2 pipeline (informative, not required for merge) ❌

Note: Conan v2 builds are informative and they are not required for the PR to be merged.

The v2 pipeline failed. Please, review the errors and note this will be required for pull requests to be merged in the near future.

See details:

Failure in build 5 (dae1574fcaaba24851a4e915d088e068976618e1):

  • cppcheck/2.7.5@:
    Error running command conan graph info --requires cppcheck/2.7.5@#ca803bf719f34f4efdd718b6170a11c7 -f json -pr:h /home/conan/w/prod-v2_cci_PR-15583/5/d49cd9e5-aa76-49d8-b5ea-66fbbfefbd89/profile_linux_11_libstdcpp11_gcc_release_64..txt -pr:b /home/conan/w/prod-v2_cci_PR-15583/5/d49cd9e5-aa76-49d8-b5ea-66fbbfefbd89/profile_linux_11_libstdcpp11_gcc_release_64..txt:
    -------- Input profiles --------
    Profile host:
    [settings]
    arch=x86_64
    build_type=Release
    compiler=gcc
    compiler.libcxx=libstdc++11
    compiler.version=11
    os=Linux
    
    Profile build:
    [settings]
    arch=x86_64
    build_type=Release
    compiler=gcc
    compiler.libcxx=libstdc++11
    compiler.version=11
    os=Linux
    
    
    -------- Computing dependency graph --------
    z3/4.8.8: Not found in local cache, looking in remotes...
    z3/4.8.8: Checking remote: conan-center-v2
    Graph root
        virtual
    Requirements
        cppcheck/2.7.5#ca803bf719f34f4efdd718b6170a11c7 - Cache
    Graph error
        Package 'z3/4.8.8' not resolved: Unable to find 'z3/4.8.8' in remotes
    ERROR: Package 'z3/4.8.8' not resolved: Unable to find 'z3/4.8.8' in remotes
    

Note: To save resources, CI tries to finish as soon as an error is found. For this reason you might find that not all the references have been launched or not all the configurations for a given reference. Also, take into account that we cannot guarantee the order of execution as it depends on CI workload and workers availability.

Copy link
Member

@uilianries uilianries left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@ericLemanissier
Copy link
Contributor

cppcheck 2.10 is already merged (I won the PR-race 😉)

@Sneder89
Copy link
Contributor Author

Sneder89 commented Feb 2, 2023

cppcheck 2.10 is already merged (I won the PR-race 😉)

Lucky you! I will close the PR.

@Sneder89 Sneder89 closed this Feb 2, 2023
@Sneder89 Sneder89 deleted the feature/cppcheck-2.10 branch February 2, 2023 14:17
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants