Sortmerna conda recipe

[biocodz]

The current recipe will be maintained parallel to the Sortmerna bioconda-recipe. The bioconda recipe currently uses pre-built binaries. The current recipe performs the whole build including building 3rd party libraries. This recipe is also going to support Windows builds (not supported on bioconda).

[conda-forge-webservices]

Hi! This is the friendly automated conda-forge-linting service.

I wanted to let you know that I linted all conda-recipes in your PR (recipes/sortmerna) and found some lint.

Here's what I've got...

For recipes/sortmerna:

• The recipe could do with some maintainers listed in the extra/recipe-maintainers section.
• Selectors are suggested to take a <two spaces>#<one space>[<expression>] form. See lines [14, 34]
• license_file entry is missing, but is required.
• The extra section contained an unexpected subsection name. skip-lints is not a valid subsection name.
• The extra section contained an unexpected subsection name. identifiers is not a valid subsection name.

For recipes/sortmerna:

• Recipe with the same name exists in bioconda: please discuss with @conda-forge/bioconda-recipes.
• Jinja2 variable references are suggested to take a {{<one space><variable name><one space>}} form. See lines [9, 9, 9, 34, 35, 36].
• License is not an SPDX identifier (or a custom LicenseRef) nor an SPDX license expression.

Documentation on acceptable licenses can be found here.

[conda-forge-webservices]

Hi! This is the friendly automated conda-forge-linting service.

I just wanted to let you know that I linted all conda-recipes in your PR (recipes/sortmerna) and found it was in an excellent condition.

I do have some suggestions for making it better though...

For recipes/sortmerna:

• Recipe with the same name exists in bioconda: please discuss with @conda-forge/bioconda-recipes.

[bgruening]

I don't think we should maintain the bioconda recipe in parallel. If this one is ready here we should remove the bioconda recipe.

[biocodz]

I agree. Mentioned the parallel just for suggestions. How do we proceed with removing the bioconda recipe? Usual pull request?

[martin-g]

I was not aware of this PR.
I also worked on the Bioconda recipe to build packages for more platforms - bioconda/bioconda-recipes#46644
It is a duplicated work for now! Once this PR is merged I will create an Arch Migrator PR to add builds for linux-aarch64 and linux-ppc64le and another PR for dropping the Bioconda recipe!

[biocodz]

Created bioconda-recipes PR 48607 to remove sortmerna recipe due relocation to conda-forge

[conda-forge-webservices]

Hi! This is the friendly automated conda-forge-linting service.

I just wanted to let you know that I linted all conda-recipes in your PR (recipes/sortmerna) and found it was in an excellent condition.

I do have some suggestions for making it better though...

For recipes/sortmerna:

• Recipe with the same name exists in bioconda: please discuss with @conda-forge/bioconda-recipes.
• This recipe is using a compiler, which now requires adding a build dependence on {{ stdlib("c") }} as well. Note that this rule applies to each output of the recipe using a compiler. For further details, please see META: {{ stdlib("c") }} migration conda-forge.github.io#2102.
• In your conda_build_config.yaml, please change the name of MACOSX_DEPLOYMENT_TARGET, to c_stdlib_version!

[biocodz]

filed issue 5391 on conda-build