Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Refactor entrypoint logic to one location #219
Refactor entrypoint logic to one location #219
Changes from all commits
f26fb2e
7d70f40
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I guess
#_start
is invalid module name?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There is a little bit of a discussion in #102 where this was originally introduced.
My understanding is that this is really a runwasi specific seperator and could be anything (
::
was suggested at one point). I scanned through https://github.com/WebAssembly/WASI but couldn't find anything that said#
is valid or notThere was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think that if this is a runwasi-specific thing, we could actually write down the semantics in how this should work and especially which entrypoint strings are valid and which not. Then we could validate the input string based on that. The benefit would be that other projects could use the same notation and semantics, and we could document the notation also for the users.
For example, should the following strings work (or not):
foo#bar
#bar
foo#bar#bar
foo
#foo#bar
foo#
foo#bar; -- %
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
this is a good idea, are you ok with opening an issue to track this? This particular PR isn't introducing anything new, just moving some code around so we don't have the same logic in several different places.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ok, added the issue.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Nice to see more tests were added!