-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 242
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
composefs: prefer std library functions #2050
composefs: prefer std library functions #2050
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Giuseppe Scrivano <gscrivan@redhat.com>
we use "ro" in composefs as well: https://github.com/containers/composefs/blob/main/libcomposefs/lcfs-mount.c#L582-L585, but MS_RDONLY should be enough |
avoid dealing directly with file descriptors but use the standard library functions. Signed-off-by: Giuseppe Scrivano <gscrivan@redhat.com>
232a788
to
39098fb
Compare
opened a PR for composefs as well: containers/composefs#309 @cgwalters PTAL |
// do not worry about checking the magic number, if the file is invalid | ||
// we will fail to mount it anyway | ||
flags := make([]byte, 4) | ||
nread, err := unix.Pread(fd, flags, 8) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't really care too much, but I would note that I think we could use https://pkg.go.dev/os#File.ReadAt here instead
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: cgwalters, giuseppe The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM (I didn’t look into the MS_RDONLY
vs "ro"
difference, if any).
/lgtm |
a couple of cleanups for the composefs backend