Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

scripts: Ignore glibc-gconv-extra lua script in %post #3103

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 6, 2021

Conversation

evan-a-a
Copy link
Contributor

@evan-a-a evan-a-a commented Sep 3, 2021

glibc-gconv-extra uses lua scripts in post as of https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/glibc/c/ca0613665ce6e1b4e92dadd3660ad39cf3dc5f3e?branch=main

The post script is the same as glibc, which was previously worked around in d04e946

glibc-gconv-extra uses lua scripts in post as of
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/glibc/c/ca0613665ce6e1b4e92dadd3660ad39cf3dc5f3e?branch=main

The post script is the same as glibc, which was previously worked around in
coreos@d04e946
@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Sep 3, 2021

Hi @evan-a-a. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a coreos member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@travier
Copy link
Member

travier commented Sep 3, 2021

/ok-to-test

@lucab lucab enabled auto-merge September 6, 2021 07:50
@lucab lucab merged commit 0bb0fa7 into coreos:main Sep 6, 2021
jlebon added a commit to jlebon/fedora-coreos-config that referenced this pull request Sep 30, 2021
It's just sitting there in Bodhi.

We want it for its own sake, but also for
coreos/rpm-ostree#3103 because of
fedora-silverblue/issue-tracker#210 which can
also apply to FCOS, even if having it as a layer is likely rarer here.
lucab pushed a commit to coreos/fedora-coreos-config that referenced this pull request Oct 1, 2021
It's just sitting there in Bodhi.

We want it for its own sake, but also for
coreos/rpm-ostree#3103 because of
fedora-silverblue/issue-tracker#210 which can
also apply to FCOS, even if having it as a layer is likely rarer here.
HuijingHei pushed a commit to HuijingHei/fedora-coreos-config that referenced this pull request Oct 10, 2023
It's just sitting there in Bodhi.

We want it for its own sake, but also for
coreos/rpm-ostree#3103 because of
fedora-silverblue/issue-tracker#210 which can
also apply to FCOS, even if having it as a layer is likely rarer here.
HuijingHei pushed a commit to HuijingHei/fedora-coreos-config that referenced this pull request Oct 10, 2023
It's just sitting there in Bodhi.

We want it for its own sake, but also for
coreos/rpm-ostree#3103 because of
fedora-silverblue/issue-tracker#210 which can
also apply to FCOS, even if having it as a layer is likely rarer here.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants