Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ENH: Add write_transform to store cache in GDAL location #141

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Jun 24, 2020
Merged

Conversation

snowman2
Copy link
Member

@snowman2 snowman2 commented Jun 23, 2020

  • Closes Store transform where GDAL will find it #129

  • Closes Store transform #139

  • Tests added

  • Fully documented, including docs/history.rst for all changes and docs/rioxarray.rst for new API

  • Noticed that the sel() operation returned an array that way sharing the coordinates of the parent for some reason ... so added copy() in slice_xy().

  • Noticed some test were using fixture instead of parametrize & weren't being run

rioxarray/rioxarray.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@snowman2
Copy link
Member Author

Appveyor failure seems to be unrelated. I am guessing to an update in scipy.

@snowman2
Copy link
Member Author

Windows has scipy 1.5 & linux/osx has 1.4

@snowman2 snowman2 merged commit 79a68b2 into master Jun 24, 2020
@snowman2 snowman2 deleted the transform branch June 24, 2020 14:07
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Store transform Store transform where GDAL will find it
2 participants