Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove error argument from WrapServiceResult API #11039

Closed
4 tasks
colin-axner opened this issue Jan 27, 2022 · 1 comment · Fixed by #11736
Closed
4 tasks

Remove error argument from WrapServiceResult API #11039

colin-axner opened this issue Jan 27, 2022 · 1 comment · Fixed by #11736
Assignees
Labels
T:Docs Changes and features related to documentation.

Comments

@colin-axner
Copy link
Contributor

colin-axner commented Jan 27, 2022

Summary

The WrapServiceResult function starts by checking the error argument to see if it is not nil and then immediately returns. This is very unconventional. Based on a quick grep, the only time this function is used also does this check before calling WrapServiceResult. If the error argument is unused, it should be removed, explicitly requiring the caller to check the error before calling WrapServiceResult

Problem Definition

The error argument is unused and the go doc doesn't explain this design decision

Proposal

Update the API or explain the reasoning in the godoc. Maybe this is intended for future usage?


For Admin Use

  • Not duplicate issue
  • Appropriate labels applied
  • Appropriate contributors tagged
  • Contributor assigned/self-assigned
@julienrbrt julienrbrt self-assigned this Apr 22, 2022
@julienrbrt julienrbrt added Type: Question T:Docs Changes and features related to documentation. labels Apr 22, 2022
@julienrbrt
Copy link
Member

julienrbrt commented Apr 22, 2022

Hey @colin-axner,

The reason is so that you don't have to do an error checking for each RPC response (res proto.Message, err error).

e.g. https://github.com/CosmWasm/wasmd/blob/main/x/wasm/handler.go#L46

I will update the docs to make that clearer!

@julienrbrt julienrbrt linked a pull request Apr 22, 2022 that will close this issue
19 tasks
@mergify mergify bot closed this as completed in #11736 Apr 24, 2022
mergify bot pushed a commit that referenced this issue Apr 24, 2022
## Description

Closes: #11039



---

### Author Checklist

*All items are required. Please add a note to the item if the item is not applicable and
please add links to any relevant follow up issues.*

I have...

- [x] included the correct [type prefix](https://github.com/commitizen/conventional-commit-types/blob/v3.0.0/index.json) in the PR title
- [ ] added `!` to the type prefix if API or client breaking change
- [ ] targeted the correct branch (see [PR Targeting](https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#pr-targeting))
- [ ] provided a link to the relevant issue or specification
- [ ] followed the guidelines for [building modules](https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/blob/master/docs/building-modules)
- [ ] included the necessary unit and integration [tests](https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#testing)
- [ ] added a changelog entry to `CHANGELOG.md`
- [ ] included comments for [documenting Go code](https://blog.golang.org/godoc)
- [ ] updated the relevant documentation or specification
- [x] reviewed "Files changed" and left comments if necessary
- [ ] confirmed all CI checks have passed

### Reviewers Checklist

*All items are required. Please add a note if the item is not applicable and please add
your handle next to the items reviewed if you only reviewed selected items.*

I have...

- [ ] confirmed the correct [type prefix](https://github.com/commitizen/conventional-commit-types/blob/v3.0.0/index.json) in the PR title
- [ ] confirmed `!` in the type prefix if API or client breaking change
- [ ] confirmed all author checklist items have been addressed 
- [ ] reviewed state machine logic
- [ ] reviewed API design and naming
- [ ] reviewed documentation is accurate
- [ ] reviewed tests and test coverage
- [ ] manually tested (if applicable)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
T:Docs Changes and features related to documentation.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants