refactor: Improve x/bank deterministic tests

[amaury1093]

Description

While reviewing #13362, I noticed two things:

1. I personally don't feel comfortable to test determinism using mocks. There might be cases where x/bank keeper calls an x/auth keeper method, and the latter is non-deterministic. Mocks wouldn't catch this. I propose to use depinject. ref: EPIC: make guarantees around query responses #13041 (comment)
2. Pagination was never tested.

This PR addresses these 2 points.

---

Author Checklist

All items are required. Please add a note to the item if the item is not applicable and
please add links to any relevant follow up issues.

I have...

• included the correct type prefix in the PR title
• added ! to the type prefix if API or client breaking change
• targeted the correct branch (see PR Targeting)
• provided a link to the relevant issue or specification
• followed the guidelines for building modules
• included the necessary unit and integration tests
• added a changelog entry to CHANGELOG.md
• included comments for documenting Go code
• updated the relevant documentation or specification
• reviewed "Files changed" and left comments if necessary
• confirmed all CI checks have passed

Reviewers Checklist

All items are required. Please add a note if the item is not applicable and please add
your handle next to the items reviewed if you only reviewed selected items.

I have...

• confirmed the correct type prefix in the PR title
• confirmed ! in the type prefix if API or client breaking change
• confirmed all author checklist items have been addressed
• reviewed state machine logic
• reviewed API design and naming
• reviewed documentation is accurate
• reviewed tests and test coverage
• manually tested (if applicable)

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #13450 (2dabaf7) into main (bb54c59) will increase coverage by 0.08%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main   #13450      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   53.87%   53.95%   +0.08%     
==========================================
  Files         641      647       +6     
  Lines       55034    55295     +261     
==========================================
+ Hits        29648    29833     +185     
- Misses      23003    23072      +69     
- Partials     2383     2390       +7     

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
x/bank/keeper/grpc_query.go	56.34% <0.00%> (-11.68%)	⬇️
crypto/keys/internal/ecdsa/privkey.go	81.13% <0.00%> (-1.89%)	⬇️
x/group/keeper/keeper.go	56.25% <0.00%> (-0.40%)	⬇️
tx/textual/valuerenderer/dec.go	74.19% <0.00%> (ø)
tx/textual/valuerenderer/valuerenderer.go	79.16% <0.00%> (ø)
tx/textual/valuerenderer/coins.go	80.80% <0.00%> (ø)
tx/textual/valuerenderer/bytes.go	60.00% <0.00%> (ø)
tx/textual/valuerenderer/timestamp.go	100.00% <0.00%> (ø)
tx/textual/valuerenderer/int.go	78.94% <0.00%> (ø)

[atheeshp]

lgtm