feat: integration test helpers #15556
Conversation
julienrbrt
changed the title
|
Opening already, so possibly we can migrate module in follow-ups. |
github-prbot
requested review from
a team and
aaronc
and removed request for
a team
julienrbrt
requested review from
mark-rushakoff and
tac0turtle
and removed request for
aaronc
julienrbrt
changed the title
| :::note | ||
| You can as well use the `AppConfig` `configurator` for creating an `AppConfig` [inline](https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/blob/v0.47.0-rc1/x/slashing/app_test.go#L54-L62). There no difference between those two ways, use whichever you prefer. | ||
| ::: | ||
| Integration tests interact with the tested module via the defined `Msg` and `Query` services. The result of the test can be verified by checking the state of the application, by checking the emitted events or the response. It is adviced to combine two of these methods to verify the result of the test. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
will we document how to set things up here or elsewhere?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Here, as they are for testing modules integrations.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I think I follow what's going on here now. Structure and organization looks fine overall.
Let's change the test labeled example to an example test so it shows up at pkg.go.dev, and there were a few other small details I called out to help consumers follow intent here.
|
Thank you for the great feedback @mark-rushakoff! I've added your suggestions. |
julienrbrt
changed the title
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I didn't read the markdown changes closely, nor did I look closely at the changes in tests/integration/slashing/keeper/keeper_test.go. But the additions to testutil/integration look fine to me.
I noted a couple other small typos here, but otherwise I think this can be merged.
| return app.ctx | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| func (app *App) QueryHelper() *baseapp.QueryServiceTestHelper { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Why don't we just return grpc.ClientConnInterface?
Right, Marko mentioned that too. I'll open a PR about the last comment. About Core API I don't think we can update it here just yet. |
Description
Closes: #14676
I have not pushed everything yet: (#15556 (comment))
I am as well exploring a way to register the msg server and query server directly when creating a integration app.
Author Checklist
All items are required. Please add a note to the item if the item is not applicable and
please add links to any relevant follow up issues.
I have...
!to the type prefix if API or client breaking changeCHANGELOG.mdReviewers Checklist
All items are required. Please add a note if the item is not applicable and please add
your handle next to the items reviewed if you only reviewed selected items.
I have...
!in the type prefix if API or client breaking change