Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(x/auth/vesting): panic on overflowing & negative EndTimes for PeriodicVestingAccount #16733

Merged
Merged
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
1 change: 1 addition & 0 deletions CHANGELOG.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -69,6 +69,7 @@ Ref: https://keepachangelog.com/en/1.0.0/

### Bug Fixes

* (x/auth/vesting) [#16733](https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/pull/16733) panic on overflowing and negative EndTimes when creating a PeriodicVestingAccount
* [#16547](https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/pull/16547) Ensure a transaction's gas limit cannot exceed the block gas limit.
* (x/auth/types) [#16554](https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/pull/16554) `ModuleAccount.Validate` now reports a nil `.BaseAccount` instead of panicking.
* (baseapp) [#16613](https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/pull/16613) Ensure each message in a transaction has a registered handler, otherwise `CheckTx` will fail.
Expand Down
5 changes: 5 additions & 0 deletions x/auth/vesting/msg_server.go
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -186,6 +186,11 @@ func (s msgServer) CreatePeriodicVestingAccount(goCtx context.Context, msg *type
baseAccount = s.AccountKeeper.NewAccount(ctx, baseAccount).(*authtypes.BaseAccount)
vestingAccount := types.NewPeriodicVestingAccount(baseAccount, totalCoins.Sort(), msg.StartTime, msg.VestingPeriods)

// Enforce and sanity check that we don't have any negative endTime.
if bva := vestingAccount.BaseVestingAccount; bva != nil && bva.EndTime < 0 {
return nil, errorsmod.Wrapf(sdkerrors.ErrInvalidRequest, "cumulative endtime is negative")
}

s.AccountKeeper.SetAccount(ctx, vestingAccount)

defer func() {
Expand Down
9 changes: 8 additions & 1 deletion x/auth/vesting/types/vesting_account.go
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -2,6 +2,7 @@ package types

import (
"errors"
"fmt"
"time"

"cosmossdk.io/math"
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -259,9 +260,15 @@ func NewPeriodicVestingAccountRaw(bva *BaseVestingAccount, startTime int64, peri
// NewPeriodicVestingAccount returns a new PeriodicVestingAccount
func NewPeriodicVestingAccount(baseAcc *authtypes.BaseAccount, originalVesting sdk.Coins, startTime int64, periods Periods) *PeriodicVestingAccount {
endTime := startTime
for _, p := range periods {
for i, p := range periods {
if p.Length < 0 {
panic(fmt.Sprintf("period #%d has a negative length: %d", i, p.Length))
}
endTime += p.Length
}
if endTime < 0 || endTime < startTime {
Copy link
Member

@julienrbrt julienrbrt Jun 28, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should this check be in the Validate function of a base vesting account and here we can call validate?

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I am skeptical of moving it there, for starters and for brevity can we keep it as is here, then later on refactor it?

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sure!

panic("cumulative endTime overflowed, and/or is less than startTime")
}
baseVestingAcc := &BaseVestingAccount{
BaseAccount: baseAcc,
OriginalVesting: originalVesting,
Expand Down
61 changes: 61 additions & 0 deletions x/auth/vesting/types/vesting_account_test.go
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -397,6 +397,67 @@ func TestGetVestedCoinsPeriodicVestingAcc(t *testing.T) {
require.Equal(t, origCoins, vestedCoins)
}

func TestOverflowAndNegativeVestedCoinsPeriods(t *testing.T) {
now := tmtime.Now()
tests := []struct {
name string
periods []types.Period
wantPanic string
}{
{
"negative .Length",
types.Periods{
types.Period{Length: -1, Amount: sdk.Coins{sdk.NewInt64Coin(feeDenom, 500), sdk.NewInt64Coin(stakeDenom, 50)}},
types.Period{Length: 6 * 60 * 60, Amount: sdk.Coins{sdk.NewInt64Coin(feeDenom, 250), sdk.NewInt64Coin(stakeDenom, 25)}},
},
"period #0 has a negative length: -1",
},
{
"overflow after .Length additions",
types.Periods{
types.Period{Length: 9223372036854775108, Amount: sdk.Coins{sdk.NewInt64Coin(feeDenom, 500), sdk.NewInt64Coin(stakeDenom, 50)}},
types.Period{Length: 6 * 60 * 60, Amount: sdk.Coins{sdk.NewInt64Coin(feeDenom, 250), sdk.NewInt64Coin(stakeDenom, 25)}},
},
"cumulative endTime overflowed, and/or is less than startTime",
},
{
"good periods that are not negative nor overflow",
types.Periods{
types.Period{Length: now.Unix() - 1000, Amount: sdk.Coins{sdk.NewInt64Coin(feeDenom, 500), sdk.NewInt64Coin(stakeDenom, 50)}},
types.Period{Length: 60, Amount: sdk.Coins{sdk.NewInt64Coin(feeDenom, 250), sdk.NewInt64Coin(stakeDenom, 25)}},
},
"",
},
}

for _, tt := range tests {
t.Run(tt.name, func(t *testing.T) {
bacc, origCoins := initBaseAccount()
defer func() {
r := recover()
if r == nil {
if tt.wantPanic != "" {
t.Fatalf("expected a panic with substring: %q", tt.wantPanic)
}
return
}

// Otherwise ensure we match the panic substring.
require.Contains(t, r, tt.wantPanic)
}()

pva := types.NewPeriodicVestingAccount(bacc, origCoins, now.Unix(), tt.periods)
if pva == nil {
return
}

if pbva := pva.BaseVestingAccount; pbva.EndTime < 0 {
t.Fatalf("Unfortunately we still have negative .EndTime :-(: %d", pbva.EndTime)
}
})
}
}

func TestGetVestingCoinsPeriodicVestingAcc(t *testing.T) {
now := tmtime.Now()
endTime := now.Add(24 * time.Hour)
Expand Down