Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

refactor(x/auth): simplify unnecessary code #19552

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 25, 2024
Merged

refactor(x/auth): simplify unnecessary code #19552

merged 1 commit into from
Feb 25, 2024

Conversation

0x2d3c
Copy link
Contributor

@0x2d3c 0x2d3c commented Feb 25, 2024

Meaningless check logic

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Refactor
    • Simplified the logic for handling custom signers in transactions, enhancing the overall process efficiency.

@0x2d3c 0x2d3c requested a review from a team as a code owner February 25, 2024 15:14
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Feb 25, 2024

Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The update involves refining the logic related to custom signer configurations in a Go project. By adjusting the conditionality of a check for custom signers, the change streamlines the assignment process for signer options. This simplification enhances code readability and potentially improves the efficiency of the configuration setup for transactions.

Changes

File Change Summary
.../tx/config/depinject.go Moved the check for CustomGetSigners to be unconditional, simplifying the logic for assigning txConfigOptions.SigningOptions.CustomGetSigners.

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share

Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit-tests for this file.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit tests for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository from git and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit tests.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger a review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • The JSON schema for the configuration file is available here.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/coderabbit-overrides.v2.json

CodeRabbit Discord Community

Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Review Status

Actionable comments generated: 0

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yml

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 7c05f41 and c226765.
Files selected for processing (1)
  • x/auth/tx/config/depinject.go (1 hunks)
Additional comments: 2
x/auth/tx/config/depinject.go (2)
  • 86-87: The refactor simplifies the handling of custom signers by making the assignment of values to txConfigOptions.SigningOptions.CustomGetSigners unconditional. This change enhances code clarity by removing unnecessary conditional logic. However, it's crucial to ensure that in.CustomGetSigners is always expected to be non-nil or that its nil case is handled elsewhere in the code to avoid potential nil pointer dereferences.
  • 83-90: > 📝 NOTE

This review was outside the diff hunks and was mapped to the diff hunk with the greatest overlap. Original lines [1-185]

Overall, the file sets up transaction configurations and handlers comprehensively. The refactor to simplify the handling of custom signers appears well-integrated with the rest of the file. It's important to ensure comprehensive testing around this change, particularly to verify that the removal of the conditional check does not introduce any regressions or unexpected behavior, especially in edge cases where in.CustomGetSigners might be nil or empty.

@julienrbrt julienrbrt changed the title refactor(depinject): simplify unnecessary code refactor(x/auth): simplify unnecessary code Feb 25, 2024
@julienrbrt julienrbrt added this pull request to the merge queue Feb 25, 2024
Merged via the queue into cosmos:main with commit 0686af7 Feb 25, 2024
60 of 62 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants