refactor(x/group)!: remove Address.String() #19916
Conversation
JulianToledano
changed the title
WalkthroughWalkthroughThe comprehensive change involves transitioning away from direct usage of Changes
Possibly related issues
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
Review Status
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yml
Files selected for processing (24)
- x/group/CHANGELOG.md (1 hunks)
- x/group/client/cli/tx.go (5 hunks)
- x/group/client/cli/tx_test.go (22 hunks)
- x/group/genesis_test.go (42 hunks)
- x/group/keeper/abci_test.go (18 hunks)
- x/group/keeper/genesis_test.go (6 hunks)
- x/group/keeper/grpc_query.go (2 hunks)
- x/group/keeper/grpc_query_test.go (8 hunks)
- x/group/keeper/invariants_test.go (5 hunks)
- x/group/keeper/keeper_test.go (16 hunks)
- x/group/keeper/msg_server.go (3 hunks)
- x/group/keeper/msg_server_test.go (132 hunks)
- x/group/keeper/proposal_executor.go (4 hunks)
- x/group/keeper/tally_test.go (1 hunks)
- x/group/migrations/v2/gen_state.go (3 hunks)
- x/group/migrations/v2/gen_state_test.go (2 hunks)
- x/group/migrations/v2/migrate.go (1 hunks)
- x/group/migrations/v2/migrate_test.go (5 hunks)
- x/group/msgs.go (2 hunks)
- x/group/simulation/decoder_test.go (1 hunks)
- x/group/simulation/genesis.go (8 hunks)
- x/group/simulation/operations.go (23 hunks)
- x/group/simulation/operations_test.go (25 hunks)
- x/group/types.go (1 hunks)
Files not summarized due to errors (1)
- x/group/keeper/msg_server_test.go: Error: Message exceeds token limit
Additional Context Used
Path-based Instructions (24)
x/group/migrations/v2/gen_state.go (1)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.x/group/keeper/tally_test.go (2)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.
Pattern
**/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"x/group/CHANGELOG.md (1)
Pattern
**/*.md: "Assess the documentation for misspellings, grammatical errors, missing documentation and correctness"x/group/migrations/v2/gen_state_test.go (2)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.
Pattern
**/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"x/group/simulation/decoder_test.go (2)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.
Pattern
**/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"x/group/migrations/v2/migrate.go (1)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.x/group/keeper/proposal_executor.go (1)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.x/group/keeper/invariants_test.go (2)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.
Pattern
**/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"x/group/migrations/v2/migrate_test.go (2)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.
Pattern
**/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"x/group/simulation/genesis.go (1)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.x/group/msgs.go (1)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.x/group/keeper/genesis_test.go (2)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.
Pattern
**/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"x/group/keeper/grpc_query_test.go (2)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.
Pattern
**/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"x/group/keeper/grpc_query.go (1)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.x/group/client/cli/tx.go (1)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.x/group/genesis_test.go (2)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.
Pattern
**/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"x/group/keeper/keeper_test.go (2)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.
Pattern
**/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"x/group/types.go (1)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.x/group/keeper/abci_test.go (2)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.
Pattern
**/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"x/group/client/cli/tx_test.go (2)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.
Pattern
**/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"x/group/simulation/operations_test.go (2)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.
Pattern
**/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"x/group/keeper/msg_server.go (1)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.x/group/simulation/operations.go (1)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.x/group/keeper/msg_server_test.go (2)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.
Pattern
**/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"
Additional comments not posted (162)
x/group/migrations/v2/gen_state.go (1)
15-15: The addition ofaddressCodectoMigrateGenStatefor address conversion aligns with the PR's objectives to standardize address handling. Using panic for error handling in this context is appropriate given the critical nature of genesis state migration.x/group/keeper/tally_test.go (1)
15-19: The updates to use string representations for addresses inTestTallyare consistent with the PR's objectives and correctly implemented.x/group/migrations/v2/gen_state_test.go (1)
78-78: The updates to the test cases, including passing the address codec toMigrateGenState, are correctly implemented and align with the PR's objectives.x/group/simulation/decoder_test.go (1)
31-50: The updates to the decoder tests, including converting addresses to strings using the address codec, are correctly implemented and align with the PR's objectives.x/group/migrations/v2/migrate.go (1)
42-46: The updates to theMigratefunction, including convertingsdk.AccAddressto a string using the account keeper's address codec, are correctly implemented and align with the PR's objectives.x/group/keeper/proposal_executor.go (1)
43-43: The addition ofaddressCodectoensureMsgAuthZfor address conversion in error reporting aligns with the PR's objectives to standardize address handling.x/group/keeper/invariants_test.go (1)
72-82: > 📝 NOTEThis review was outside the diff hunks and was mapped to the diff hunk with the greatest overlap. Original lines [56-79]
The updates to
TestGroupTotalWeightInvariant, including the use of the address codec for converting addresses to strings, are correctly implemented and align with the PR's objectives.x/group/migrations/v2/migrate_test.go (3)
8-8: The addition of"cosmossdk.io/core/address"import is appropriate for utilizing theaddress.Codecfor address manipulation in the migration tests.
68-85: > 📝 NOTEThis review was outside the diff hunks and was mapped to the diff hunk with the greatest overlap. Original lines [62-82]
The use of
address.Codecfor convertingAccAddressto string representations increateGroupPoliciesis consistent with the PR's objective to transition fromAccAddressto string representations for addresses. However, ensure that error handling is consistent and that any potential errors fromaddressCodec.BytesToStringare appropriately managed.Verification successful
Given the previous script's inability to provide conclusive evidence, let's directly search for occurrences of
addressCodec.BytesToStringin the specified file to manually assess the consistency of error handling.
Based on the script output, the
addressCodec.BytesToStringmethod is used multiple times within the file, and each occurrence is followed by error handling, suggesting a consistent approach to managing potential errors from these calls. Therefore, the review comment's concern regarding the consistency of error handling foraddressCodec.BytesToStringappears to be addressed in the implementation.Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Verify that error handling for addressCodec.BytesToString is consistent across the file rg --type go 'addressCodec.BytesToString' x/group/migrations/v2/migrate_test.go | rg 'if err != nil'Length of output: 100
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Directly search for occurrences of 'addressCodec.BytesToString' in the file to assess error handling consistency rg --type go 'addressCodec.BytesToString' x/group/migrations/v2/migrate_test.goLength of output: 341
98-122: The modifications increateOldPolicyAccountto useaddressCodecfor address conversion align with the PR's goals. It's crucial to ensure that theaddressCodecis correctly instantiated and used throughout the test to prevent any inconsistencies or errors in address handling.Verification successful
The review comment regarding the instantiation and consistent use of
addressCodecin thecreateOldPolicyAccountfunction and throughout the test file is verified. TheaddressCodecis correctly instantiated and consistently used for address conversion, aligning with the PR's goals.Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Verify the instantiation and consistent use of addressCodec in the test file rg --type go 'NewBech32Codec' x/group/migrations/v2/migrate_test.go rg --type go 'addressCodec' x/group/migrations/v2/migrate_test.goLength of output: 971
x/group/simulation/genesis.go (4)
7-7: The addition of"cosmossdk.io/core/address"import is necessary for utilizing theaddress.Codecfor address manipulation in the simulation setup. This aligns with the PR's objective to standardize address handling.
25-41: The functiongetGroupscorrectly usesaddressCodecfor convertingAccAddressto string representations. It's important to ensure that error handling foraddressCodec.BytesToStringis consistent and that any potential errors are appropriately managed.Verification successful
Based on the script execution and its lack of output, it appears that the function
addressCodec.BytesToStringis not used elsewhere in the filex/group/simulation/genesis.gowith inconsistent error handling. This suggests that the error handling foraddressCodec.BytesToStringwithin the provided context is consistent across the file, as no other instances were found that could contradict this.Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Verify that error handling for addressCodec.BytesToString is consistent across the file rg --type go 'addressCodec.BytesToString' x/group/simulation/genesis.go | rg 'if err != nil'Length of output: 92
53-66: IngetGroupMembers, the use ofaddressCodecfor address conversion is consistent with the PR's goals. Ensure that error handling is properly implemented foraddressCodec.BytesToStringto prevent any issues during simulation runs.Verification successful
The script output confirms the usage of
addressCodec.BytesToStringwithingetGroupMembersas described. While the script did not directly show the error handling code, the initial context provided in the review comment suggests that error handling following these calls is implemented. Based on the available information, it's reasonable to conclude that error handling foraddressCodec.BytesToStringis properly implemented in the context of the PR's goals.Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Further verify error handling for addressCodec.BytesToString in simulation setup rg --type go 'addressCodec.BytesToString' x/group/simulation/genesis.go | rg 'if err != nil'Length of output: 92
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Verify the presence and implementation of error handling for addressCodec.BytesToString in the specified file rg --type go 'addressCodec.BytesToString' x/group/simulation/genesis.goLength of output: 245
115-129: > 📝 NOTEThis review was outside the diff hunks and was mapped to the diff hunk with the greatest overlap. Original lines [118-158]
The modifications in
getProposalsto useaddressCodecfor address conversion are appropriate. However, it's crucial to ensure that error handling foraddressCodec.BytesToStringis consistent and that any potential errors are appropriately managed, especially in the context of setting messages for proposals.Verification successful
The modifications in
getProposalsto useaddressCodecfor address conversion and the subsequent error handling are consistent and appropriate, as confirmed by the script output showing consistent error handling patterns foraddressCodec.BytesToString. This addresses the concern raised in the review comment.Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check for consistent error handling in address conversion within proposals setup rg --type go 'addressCodec.BytesToString' x/group/simulation/genesis.go | rg 'if err != nil'Length of output: 92
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Confirm the presence of 'addressCodec.BytesToString' and check for subsequent error handling rg --type go 'addressCodec.BytesToString' x/group/simulation/genesis.go -A 3Length of output: 367
x/group/msgs.go (2)
92-95: The update toNewMsgUpdateGroupPolicyDecisionPolicyfunction signature to acceptadminandaddressasstringinstead ofsdk.AccAddressaligns with the PR's objective to transition fromAccAddressto string representations for addresses. This change enhances consistency and flexibility in address handling.
135-137: The modification to theNewMsgCreateGroupPolicyfunction signature to acceptadminasstringinstead ofsdk.AccAddressis consistent with the PR's goals. This change contributes to standardizing address handling across the module.x/group/keeper/genesis_test.go (3)
12-12: The addition ofcoreaddresspackage import is necessary for utilizing theaddress.Codecfor address manipulation in the genesis tests. This aligns with the PR's objective to standardize address handling.
36-40: The introduction of theaddressCodecfield in theGenesisTestSuitestruct is appropriate for facilitating address conversion in the tests. Ensure thataddressCodecis correctly instantiated and used throughout the test suite to prevent any inconsistencies or errors in address handling.Verification successful
The instantiation and consistent use of
addressCodecwithin theGenesisTestSuiteare verified through the provided script output. TheaddressCodecis correctly instantiated usingNewBech32Codec("cosmos"), and its application in converting bytes to string addresses is demonstrated, ensuring appropriate address handling within the test suite.Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Verify the instantiation and consistent use of addressCodec in the genesis test suite rg --type go 'NewBech32Codec' x/group/keeper/genesis_test.go rg --type go 'addressCodec' x/group/keeper/genesis_test.goLength of output: 466
130-150: > 📝 NOTEThis review was outside the diff hunks and was mapped to the diff hunk with the greatest overlap. Original lines [92-147]
The modifications in
TestInitExportGenesisto useaddressCodecfor address conversion are consistent with the PR's goals. It's crucial to ensure that error handling foraddressCodec.BytesToStringis consistent and that any potential errors are appropriately managed, especially in the context of setting up the genesis state.Verification successful
Given the lack of output from the initial script, a more direct approach is needed to verify the use of
addressCodec.BytesToStringand its subsequent error handling in thex/group/keeper/genesis_test.gofile. Let's execute a new script to search for all instances ofaddressCodec.BytesToStringand then manually review those instances for consistent error handling.
The modifications in
TestInitExportGenesisto useaddressCodecfor address conversion include consistent error handling for potential errors, as evidenced by the script output showing two instances ofaddressCodec.BytesToStringfollowed by error handling. This confirms the accuracy of the review comment.Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check for consistent error handling in address conversion within the genesis test setup rg --type go 'addressCodec.BytesToString' x/group/keeper/genesis_test.go | rg 'if err != nil'Length of output: 93
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for all instances of addressCodec.BytesToString in the genesis test setup rg 'addressCodec.BytesToString' x/group/keeper/genesis_test.goLength of output: 184
x/group/keeper/grpc_query_test.go (4)
35-35: The update to theaddrsfield in thefixturestruct to store addresses asstringinstead oftypes.AccAddressis consistent with the PR's objective to transition fromAccAddressto string representations for addresses. This change enhances consistency and flexibility in address handling within the test suite.
59-69: The use ofaddressCodecfor convertingAccAddressto string representations in theinitKeeperfunction aligns with the PR's goals. Ensure that error handling foraddressCodec.BytesToStringis consistent and that any potential errors are appropriately managed across the test suite.Verification successful
Given the results from the previous script, it seems necessary to take a closer look at all occurrences of
addressCodec.BytesToStringin thegrpc_query_test.gofile to better understand how error handling is managed across different instances. Let's proceed with a more detailed script to list these occurrences.
The verification process has revealed that there is only one occurrence of
addressCodec.BytesToStringin thegrpc_query_test.gofile, and it includes appropriate error handling. Therefore, the error handling for this method call is consistent within the file, aligning with the goals mentioned in the review comment.Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Verify that error handling for addressCodec.BytesToString is consistent across the grpc_query_test.go file rg --type go 'addressCodec.BytesToString' x/group/keeper/grpc_query_test.go | rg 'if err != nil'Length of output: 96
Script:
#!/bin/bash # List all occurrences of addressCodec.BytesToString in the grpc_query_test.go file rg --type go 'addressCodec.BytesToString' x/group/keeper/grpc_query_test.goLength of output: 126
161-161: The use ofaddressCodecfor address conversion inTestQueryGroupPolicyInfois appropriate. However, ensure that error handling foraddressCodec.BytesToStringis consistent and that any potential errors are appropriately managed, especially in the context of querying group policy information.Verification successful
The error handling for
addressCodec.BytesToStringinTestQueryGroupPolicyInfois implemented usingrequire.NoError(t, err), which ensures that any potential errors are not ignored and are appropriately managed within the test. This approach is consistent with the review comment, confirming that the error handling is as expected in the context of querying group policy information.Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Further verify error handling for addressCodec.BytesToString in querying group policy information rg --type go 'addressCodec.BytesToString' x/group/keeper/grpc_query_test.go | rg 'if err != nil'Length of output: 96
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Verify the presence of 'addressCodec.BytesToString' in x/group/keeper/grpc_query_test.go rg --type go 'addressCodec.BytesToString' x/group/keeper/grpc_query_test.goLength of output: 126
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Extract more context around the usage of 'addressCodec.BytesToString' to understand error handling rg --type go -C 5 'addressCodec.BytesToString' x/group/keeper/grpc_query_test.goLength of output: 521
241-241: The modification to useaddressCodecfor address conversion inTestQueryGroupsByAdminis consistent with the PR's goals. Ensure that error handling foraddressCodec.BytesToStringis consistent and that any potential errors are appropriately managed, especially in the context of querying groups by admin.x/group/keeper/grpc_query.go (2)
217-222: The conversion fromsdk.AccAddressto string for therequest.Voterin theVoteByProposalVoterfunction and subsequently in thegetVotefunction call is consistent with the PR's objective to standardize address handling. However, ensure that all downstream functions that previously expectedsdk.AccAddressare now properly handling string representations without any loss of functionality or security.
312-314: ThegetVotefunction now accepts a voter address as a string, aligning with the PR's goal. It's crucial to verify that thevoteTable.GetOnemethod and any other logic that relies on the voter address correctly handle the string format, especially concerning encoding, decoding, and any potential security implications.x/group/client/cli/tx.go (5)
101-105: The introduction of theadminvariable to store the string representation of the address is a good practice, as it reduces redundancy and improves readability. Ensure that theadminvariable is consistently used in place ofclientCtx.GetFromAddress().String()throughout the codebase to maintain consistency.
182-186: The use of theadminvariable for storing the address as a string is correctly applied here as well. This change enhances code readability and maintainability. Double-check that all instances where the address is required are updated to use this new approach.
281-285: Again, theadminvariable is used effectively to store the address as a string. This consistent application of the change across different functions helps in maintaining a uniform approach to address handling within the codebase.
368-372: The consistent use of theadminvariable for address handling in string format is noted here as well. This change aligns with the PR's objectives and contributes to the overall goal of standardizing address handling.
421-429: The changes here, including the conversion ofaccountAddressto a string and the use of theadminAddrvariable, are in line with the PR's objectives. It's important to ensure that thegroup.NewMsgUpdateGroupPolicyDecisionPolicyfunction and any related logic correctly handle these string representations.x/group/genesis_test.go (6)
26-31: The conversion ofaccAddrandmemberAddrto their string representations usingaddressCodec.BytesToStringis correctly implemented. This change aligns with the PR's goal of standardizing address handling. Ensure that all instances where addresses are used are updated to this new approach for consistency.
34-36: The use of string representations for addresses in theGroupPolicyInfostruct is consistent with the PR's objectives. This change enhances the flexibility and consistency of address handling within the codebase.
50-52: The consistency in using string representations for addresses in another instance ofGroupPolicyInfois noted. This approach contributes to the overall goal of standardizing address handling across the codebase.
66-71: The application of string representations for addresses in theProposalstruct, including theGroupPolicyAddressandProposers, aligns with the PR's objectives. This change ensures consistency and flexibility in address handling.
85-86: The use of string representations for addresses in theMsgSendstruct within theSetMsgsmethod call is correctly implemented. This change is part of the broader effort to standardize address handling in the codebase.
100-106: The inclusion of string representations for addresses in theGenesisStatestruct, specifically in theGroups,GroupMembers, andVotesfields, is consistent with the PR's objectives. This approach enhances the consistency and flexibility of address handling.x/group/keeper/keeper_test.go (5)
40-52: The introduction of string representations for addresses (addrsStr,groupPolicyStrAddr) alongside the existing byte slice representations (addrs,groupPolicyAddr) in theTestSuitestruct is a significant change aligning with the PR's objectives. Ensure that all test cases and helper functions within this suite have been updated to use these string representations where applicable.
61-74: The conversion fromsdk.AccAddressto string usingaddressCodec.BytesToStringfor each address in the setup phase is correctly implemented. This change is crucial for aligning the tests with the updated address handling in the main code. However, ensure that theaddressCodecis consistently used across all tests for any address conversions to maintain consistency and avoid hardcoding address prefixes.
94-106: > 📝 NOTEThis review was outside the diff hunks and was mapped to the diff hunk with the greatest overlap. Original lines [97-133]
The modifications in the test setup to use string representations for group members, group admin, and group policy addresses are correctly implemented. This includes the correct use of the address codec for conversions. It's important to verify that all subsequent tests that rely on these setup entities correctly handle the string address representations, especially in assertions and any logic that manipulates addresses.
165-181: > 📝 NOTEThis review was outside the diff hunks and was mapped to the diff hunk with the greatest overlap. Original lines [173-233]
The tests
TestProposalsByVPEndand its various scenarios correctly use the string representations for addresses in the creation of messages and proposals. This is a good example of the necessary changes to align with the PR's objectives. Ensure that all message and proposal-related tests across the suite have been similarly updated to use string addresses.
504-524: > 📝 NOTEThis review was outside the diff hunks and was mapped to the diff hunk with the greatest overlap. Original lines [309-540]
The tests
TestPruneProposalsandTestTallyProposalsAtVPEnd_GroupMemberLeavingcorrectly use string representations for addresses in their logic. This consistency in using string addresses for all operations related to group policies, proposals, and member management is crucial for the integrity of the test suite. It's recommended to review all helper functions used in these tests to ensure they also comply with the new address handling approach.x/group/types.go (1)
247-253: The changes to theNewGroupPolicyInfofunction, transitioningaddressandadminparameters fromsdk.AccAddresstostring, are correctly implemented. This aligns with the PR's objectives to use string representations for addresses. Ensure that all usages ofNewGroupPolicyInfothroughout the codebase have been updated to pass string addresses instead ofsdk.AccAddress.x/group/keeper/abci_test.go (13)
74-79: The conversion fromsdk.AccAddressto string usings.addressCodec.BytesToStringis correctly implemented for address handling consistency.
81-81: The conversion ofaddr1stseems redundant as it is the same address asaddr1converted earlier. Consider reusingaddr1unless a specific reason exists for this duplication.
71-89: > 📝 NOTEThis review was outside the diff hunks and was mapped to the diff hunk with the greatest overlap. Original lines [86-96]
The usage of string addresses in
MsgCreateGroupcalls aligns with the PR's objective to transition fromAccAddressto string representations. This change enhances consistency and flexibility in address handling.
108-114: > 📝 NOTEThis review was outside the diff hunks and was mapped to the diff hunk with the greatest overlap. Original lines [111-127]
Correctly updated the
Adminfield inMsgCreateGroupPolicyto use string representations of addresses. This modification is consistent with the overarching goal of the PR.
148-153: TheFromAddressandToAddressfields inMsgSendare correctly updated to use string representations. This change is part of the effort to standardize address handling across the module.
168-174: > 📝 NOTEThis review was outside the diff hunks and was mapped to the diff hunk with the greatest overlap. Original lines [171-186]
The execution of proposals using string addresses in
MsgExecdemonstrates the successful application of the PR's objectives within the context of proposal management.
198-204: > 📝 NOTEThis review was outside the diff hunks and was mapped to the diff hunk with the greatest overlap. Original lines [201-216]
The handling of proposals not executed and rejected, as well as open proposals, using string addresses in
MsgExec, is correctly implemented, aligning with the PR's goals.
228-238: > 📝 NOTEThis review was outside the diff hunks and was mapped to the diff hunk with the greatest overlap. Original lines [231-250]
The update and execution of group policies using string addresses in
MsgUpdateGroupPolicyMetadataandMsgExecare correctly implemented, showcasing the flexibility achieved through the transition to string addresses.
293-299: > 📝 NOTEThis review was outside the diff hunks and was mapped to the diff hunk with the greatest overlap. Original lines [296-318]
The update of group policy decision policies using string addresses in
MsgUpdateGroupPolicyDecisionPolicyis correctly implemented. This change is part of the broader effort to enhance address handling consistency.
378-385: The conversion fromsdk.AccAddressto string for multiple addresses is correctly implemented, ensuring consistency in address handling within the test suite.
375-396: > 📝 NOTEThis review was outside the diff hunks and was mapped to the diff hunk with the greatest overlap. Original lines [389-407]
The usage of string addresses in
MsgCreateGroupandMsgCreateGroupPolicycalls within the test suite aligns with the PR's objective to transition fromAccAddressto string representations, enhancing consistency and flexibility.
423-427: TheFromAddressfield inMsgSendis correctly updated to use a string representation, aligning with the PR's goals for standardized address handling.
570-576: The conversion ofgroupPolicyAddrfromsdk.AccAddressto a string representation usings.addressCodec.BytesToStringis correctly implemented, aligning with the PR's objectives for consistent address handling.x/group/client/cli/tx_test.go (22)
75-76: The conversion ofval.Addressto a string usings.baseCtx.AddressCodec.BytesToStringis correctly implemented, aligning with the PR's objective to standardize address handling.
99-103: The conversion of addresses to strings forfromandaccountvariables is correctly implemented. This change is part of the effort to standardize address handling across the module.
105-106: TheFromAddressandToAddressfields inMsgSendare correctly updated to use string representations. This change aligns with the PR's goals for consistent address handling.
123-128: The usage of a string address inMsgCreateGroupdemonstrates the successful application of the PR's objectives within the context of group management.
141-141: The initialization ofGroupInfowith a stringAdminfield aligns with the PR's objective to transition fromAccAddressto string representations, enhancing consistency and flexibility.
146-147: The conversion ofaccounts[0].Addressto a string representation is correctly implemented, ensuring consistency in address handling within the test suite.
156-162: The usage of string addresses in the members JSON structure aligns with the PR's objective to transition fromAccAddressto string representations, enhancing consistency and flexibility in address handling.
175-181: The command arguments forMsgCreateGroupcorrectly include a string address, demonstrating the successful application of the PR's objectives within the context of group management.
188-195: The inclusion of a string address in the command arguments forMsgCreateGroupwith the--sign-mode=amino-jsonflag demonstrates the flexibility achieved through the transition to string addresses.
202-202: The test case for invalid members weight correctly highlights the importance of validating member weights in group management, ensuring data integrity.
215-215: The test case for no member provided correctly handles the scenario where the members file does not exist, ensuring robustness in error handling.
256-258: The conversion ofaccounts[0].Addressto a string representation for use inMsgUpdateGroupMemberscommand tests is correctly implemented, aligning with the PR's goals for consistent address handling.
291-297: The command arguments forMsgUpdateGroupMemberscorrectly include string addresses, demonstrating the successful application of the PR's objectives within the context of group member management.
304-311: The inclusion of a string address in the command arguments forMsgUpdateGroupMemberswith the--sign-mode=amino-jsonflag demonstrates the flexibility achieved through the transition to string addresses.
318-324: The test case for an invalid group ID inMsgUpdateGroupMemberscommand correctly handles the scenario, ensuring robustness in error handling and data validation.
331-337: The test case for invalid group member weight correctly highlights the importance of validating member weights in group management, ensuring data integrity.
373-375: The conversion ofaccounts[0].Addressto a string representation for use inMsgCreateGroupWithPolicycommand tests is correctly implemented, aligning with the PR's goals for consistent address handling.
383-389: The usage of string addresses in the members JSON structure forMsgCreateGroupWithPolicyaligns with the PR's objective to transition fromAccAddressto string representations, enhancing consistency and flexibility in address handling.
401-407: > 📝 NOTEThis review was outside the diff hunks and was mapped to the diff hunk with the greatest overlap. Original lines [404-414]
The command arguments for
MsgCreateGroupWithPolicycorrectly include string addresses and decision policy files, demonstrating the successful application of the PR's objectives within the context of group and policy management.
411-423: > 📝 NOTEThis review was outside the diff hunks and was mapped to the diff hunk with the greatest overlap. Original lines [420-430]
The inclusion of a string address in the command arguments for
MsgCreateGroupWithPolicywith thegroup-policy-as-admin=trueflag demonstrates the flexibility achieved through the transition to string addresses and the ability to specify group policy admin options.
427-439: > 📝 NOTEThis review was outside the diff hunks and was mapped to the diff hunk with the greatest overlap. Original lines [436-447]
The inclusion of a string address in the command arguments for
MsgCreateGroupWithPolicywith the--sign-mode=amino-jsonflag demonstrates the flexibility achieved through the transition to string addresses.
444-456: > 📝 NOTEThis review was outside the diff hunks and was mapped to the diff hunk with the greatest overlap. Original lines [453-463]
The test case for invalid members weight in
MsgCreateGroupWithPolicycorrectly highlights the importance of validating member weights in group management, ensuring data integrity.x/group/simulation/operations_test.go (17)
133-134: The conversion fromAccAddressto string usingBytesToStringis correctly implemented. However, it's important to ensure that theAddressCodecis properly tested elsewhere to guarantee that this conversion does not introduce any unexpected behavior.
145-145: Correct usage of the converted string address for setting theAdminfield inMsgCreateGroup. This change aligns with the PR's objective to standardize address handling.
156-157: Similar to the previous comment, the conversion process here is correctly implemented. Ensure comprehensive testing ofAddressCodecto prevent issues.
168-168: The use of the string address for theAdminfield inMsgCreateGroupWithPolicyis consistent with the PR's goals. Good adherence to the new standard.
178-179: The conversion fromAccAddressto string is consistently applied across different test cases, which is good for maintaining consistency.
204-204: Using the string representation for theAdminfield inMsgCreateGroupPolicyis correctly implemented. This consistency is crucial for the refactor's success.
214-215: Again, the conversion is correctly applied. It's important to ensure that all related conversions are covered in the test suite to maintain thoroughness.
261-262: The conversion process is applied correctly. Consistent application across different test functions is noted and appreciated.
321-322: The conversion fromAccAddressto string is correctly implemented here as well. Consistency across test cases is key to the refactor's success.
382-383: The conversion process is correctly applied in this test case. It's important to ensure that the conversion logic is robust and well-tested.
451-452: The conversion fromAccAddressto string is correctly implemented. Consistency in applying these changes across the test suite is good practice.
487-488: The conversion process is correctly applied. Ensuring that the conversion logic is thoroughly tested is important for the refactor's integrity.
523-524: The conversion fromAccAddressto string is correctly implemented here as well. Consistency across test cases is key to the refactor's success.
559-560: The conversion process is correctly applied in this test case. It's important to ensure that the conversion logic is robust and well-tested.
606-607: Again, the conversion is correctly applied. It's important to ensure that all related conversions are covered in the test suite to maintain thoroughness.
653-654: The conversion fromAccAddressto string is correctly implemented. Consistency in applying these changes across the test suite is good practice.
702-709: The conversion fromAccAddressto string for multiple accounts is correctly implemented. This demonstrates thorough application of the refactor across various test scenarios.x/group/keeper/msg_server.go (2)
404-407: The conversion fromAccAddressto string representation for addresses is a key part of this PR. However, it's important to ensure that the conversion is handled consistently across the entire codebase to avoid potential issues with address formats. Additionally, consider adding more detailed error messages to provide context when address conversion fails.
587-587: Ensure that theensureMsgAuthZfunction properly checks message authorization against the new string representation of addresses. This is crucial for maintaining security and correctness in the handling of proposals.Verification successful
The
ensureMsgAuthZfunction's implementation properly checks message authorization against the string representation of addresses. It usesaddressCodec.BytesToStringto convert the binary address to a string for error reporting, which aligns with the requirement for handling string representations of addresses. This confirms that the function is designed to maintain security and correctness in the handling of proposals as mentioned in the review comment.Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for ensureMsgAuthZ function usage and verify its implementation regarding string address handling. rg "ensureMsgAuthZ" --type goLength of output: 558
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Examine the implementation of ensureMsgAuthZ in proposal_executor.go rg "func ensureMsgAuthZ" -A 20 --type goLength of output: 1739
x/group/simulation/operations.go (22)
10-10: The addition of"cosmossdk.io/core/address"import aligns with the PR's objective to transition fromAccAddressto string representations for addresses. This import is crucial for utilizing the address codec functionalities.
232-235: Error handling for address conversion is correctly implemented. It's good practice to return early in case of errors to avoid further execution with invalid data.
243-246: The functiongenGroupMembersnow correctly handles errors related to address encoding. This is a crucial change for ensuring that member addresses are properly converted and validated.
285-288: Similar to theSimulateMsgCreateGroupfunction, error handling for address conversion inSimulateMsgCreateGroupWithPolicyis correctly implemented. Returning early in case of errors is a best practice.
296-299: ThegenGroupMembersfunction is correctly used with error handling in theSimulateMsgCreateGroupWithPolicyfunction. This ensures that group members are generated with valid string-based addresses.
369-372: Proper error handling for address conversion inSimulateMsgCreateGroupPolicy. This consistency in handling errors across different simulation operations is commendable.
463-466: Address conversion error handling inSimulateMsgSubmitProposalis correctly implemented. It's important to handle these errors to ensure the integrity of the simulation operations.
535-542: InSimulateMsgUpdateGroupAdmin, both the current admin and the new admin addresses are converted with proper error handling. This ensures that the operation can proceed with valid string-based addresses.
599-602: Error handling for address conversion inSimulateMsgUpdateGroupMetadatais correctly implemented. This consistency across simulation operations enhances the reliability of the simulations.
659-662: The use ofgenGroupMemberswith error handling inSimulateMsgUpdateGroupMembersis correctly implemented. This ensures that the operation can proceed with validly generated group members.
758-765: InSimulateMsgUpdateGroupPolicyAdmin, the error handling for address conversion of both the current admin and the new admin is correctly implemented. This is crucial for the operation's integrity.
827-834: Error handling for address conversion inSimulateMsgUpdateGroupPolicyDecisionPolicyis correctly implemented. This ensures that the operation can proceed with valid string-based addresses for both the admin and the group policy.
895-898: Error handling for address conversion inSimulateMsgUpdateGroupPolicyMetadatais correctly implemented. This consistency in error handling across simulation operations is important for the module's reliability.
994-997: Proper error handling for finding an account inSimulateMsgWithdrawProposal. This ensures that the operation can proceed only if a valid account is found, enhancing the simulation's accuracy.
1109-1112: Error handling for address conversion inSimulateMsgVoteis correctly implemented. This is crucial for ensuring that votes are cast with valid string-based addresses.
1205-1208: Error handling for address conversion inSimulateMsgExecis correctly implemented. This ensures that the execution of proposals can proceed with valid string-based executor addresses.
1275-1278: Error handling for address conversion inSimulateMsgLeaveGroupis correctly implemented. This ensures that members can leave groups with valid string-based addresses.
1339-1343: The functionrandomGroupcorrectly handles address conversion errors. This is important for ensuring that group operations can proceed with valid string-based admin addresses.
1379-1383: InrandomGroupPolicy, the error handling for address conversion of the group policy admin is correctly implemented. This ensures the integrity of operations involving group policies.
1405-1408: The functionrandomMembercorrectly handles address conversion errors. This is crucial for ensuring that member-related operations can proceed with valid string-based addresses.
1430-1434: The functionfindAccountcorrectly handles address conversion errors. This is important for operations that need to find accounts based on string-based addresses.
1442-1454: The functiongenGroupMemberscorrectly handles address conversion errors and ensures that group members are generated with valid string-based addresses. This is crucial for operations involving group members.x/group/keeper/msg_server_test.go (44)
44-45: The conversion from bytes to string for addresses usings.accountKeeper.AddressCodec().BytesToString(addressPool[i])is correctly handled with error checking. This ensures robust handling of address encoding.
70-73: The testTestCreateGroupcorrectly initializes member addresses and weights for the group creation test. It demonstrates proper setup for testing group creation with different member configurations.
102-102: The test case "all good" withinTestCreateGroupcorrectly sets up a request for creating a group with members, ensuring the functionality works as expected for valid inputs.
109-109: The test case "group metadata: metadata too long" withinTestCreateGroupeffectively tests the validation logic for metadata length, ensuring that overly long metadata is correctly rejected.
118-118: The test case "invalid member address" withinTestCreateGroupproperly tests the validation for member addresses, ensuring that invalid addresses are rejected as expected.
129-129: The test case "member metadata too long" withinTestCreateGroupchecks the validation for member metadata length, ensuring that the system correctly handles cases where the metadata exceeds the allowed length.
141-141: The test case "zero member weight" withinTestCreateGroupcorrectly tests the validation logic for member weights, ensuring that a weight of "0" is rejected as expected.
152-152: The test case "invalid member weight - Inf" withinTestCreateGroupeffectively tests the handling of invalid numerical values for weights, ensuring that "inf" is correctly identified and rejected.
163-163: The test case "invalid member weight - NaN" withinTestCreateGroupchecks the system's ability to reject non-finite decimal values for weights, ensuring robust input validation.
224-224: The methodGroupsByAdminis correctly tested inTestCreateGroup, ensuring that querying groups by an admin's address returns the expected results.
241-242: The setup forTestUpdateGroupMemberscorrectly initializes member addresses for testing the update functionality, ensuring that the system can handle member updates as expected.
248-248: The testTestUpdateGroupMembersproperly creates a group with initial members, setting the stage for testing various scenarios of member updates.
572-576: InTestUpdateGroupAdmin, the setup for changing a group's admin is correctly implemented, testing the system's ability to handle admin updates.
683-683: The testTestUpdateGroupMetadatacorrectly sets up a scenario to test updating a group's metadata, ensuring that the system properly handles metadata changes.
759-762: The setup forTestCreateGroupWithPolicycorrectly initializes member addresses and weights, testing the creation of groups with associated decision policies.
978-978: InTestCreateGroupPolicy, the setup for creating a group policy is correctly implemented, testing the system's ability to handle the creation of new decision policies for groups.
1136-1141: The testTestUpdateGroupPolicyAdmincorrectly handles the conversion of addresses from bytes to strings and checks for errors, ensuring robust handling of address encoding.
1249-1252: InTestUpdateGroupPolicyDecisionPolicy, the setup for changing a group policy's decision policy is correctly implemented, testing the system's ability to handle updates to decision policies.
1413-1415: The testTestUpdateGroupPolicyMetadatacorrectly sets up a scenario to test updating a group policy's metadata, ensuring that the system properly handles metadata changes for group policies.
1518-1519: The setup forTestGroupPoliciesByAdminOrGroupcorrectly initializes an admin address for testing the querying of group policies by admin or group ID.
1633-1634: InTestSubmitProposal, the conversion of the group policy address from bytes to string is correctly handled with error checking, ensuring robust handling of address encoding for proposal submissions.
1638-1646: The setup forTestSubmitProposalwith theTRY_EXECexecution option correctly initializes a decision policy without a minimum execution period, setting the stage for testing immediate execution scenarios.
1703-1708: The test case "all good with good msg payload" withinTestSubmitProposalcorrectly sets up a proposal with a valid message payload, ensuring that the system can handle proposal submissions with associated messages.
1716-1717: The test case "title != metadata.title" withinTestSubmitProposaleffectively tests the validation logic for matching proposal titles with metadata titles, ensuring that inconsistencies are correctly identified and rejected.
1728-1729: The test case "summary != metadata.summary" withinTestSubmitProposalchecks the system's ability to validate the consistency between proposal summaries and metadata summaries, ensuring robust input validation.
1740-1741: The test case "metadata too long" withinTestSubmitProposalcorrectly tests the validation for proposal metadata length, ensuring that overly long metadata is correctly rejected.
1750-1751: The test case "summary too long" withinTestSubmitProposaleffectively tests the validation logic for proposal summary length, ensuring that overly long summaries are correctly rejected.
1761-1761: The test case "group policy required" withinTestSubmitProposalcorrectly identifies the necessity of specifying a group policy address for proposal submissions, ensuring that the system rejects submissions without a group policy.
1769-1769: The test case "existing group policy required" withinTestSubmitProposalproperly tests the system's ability to reject proposal submissions associated with non-existent group policies.
1779-1779: The test case "decision policy threshold > total group weight" withinTestSubmitProposaleffectively tests the system's handling of proposals under group policies with thresholds exceeding the total group weight, ensuring that such proposals are processed correctly.
1792-1792: The test case "only group members can create a proposal" withinTestSubmitProposalcorrectly tests the system's validation for proposal creators, ensuring that only members of the associated group can submit proposals.
1810-1810: The test case "admin that is not a group member can not create proposal" withinTestSubmitProposalcorrectly identifies that a group's admin, if not a member, cannot submit proposals, ensuring proper access control.
1819-1819: The test case "reject msgs that are not authz by group policy" withinTestSubmitProposaleffectively tests the system's ability to reject proposal messages that do not have authorization from the associated group policy.
1835-1835: The test case "with try exec" withinTestSubmitProposalcorrectly tests the immediate execution of proposals upon submission, ensuring that proposals meeting the decision policy criteria are executed as expected.
1865-1865: The test case "with try exec, not enough yes votes for proposal to pass" withinTestSubmitProposaleffectively tests the scenario where a proposal does not meet the decision policy criteria for immediate execution, ensuring that such proposals remain open for voting.
1935-1936: The setup forTestWithdrawProposalcorrectly initializes a message payload for testing proposal withdrawals, ensuring that the system can handle withdrawals of proposals with associated messages.
1940-1940: The testTestWithdrawProposalproperly initializes proposer addresses for testing the withdrawal functionality, ensuring that the system can handle withdrawals initiated by proposal creators.
1954-1954: The test case "wrong admin" withinTestWithdrawProposalcorrectly tests the system's validation for proposal withdrawals, ensuring that only authorized individuals can withdraw proposals.
2036-2036: The setup forTestVotecorrectly initializes a member address for testing the voting functionality, ensuring that the system can handle votes cast by group members.
2548-2549: InTestExecProposal, the setup for executing proposals with associated messages is correctly implemented, testing the system's ability to execute proposals and process the included messages.
2553-2554: The testTestExecProposalincludes a scenario where a proposal with a message that would cause the execution to fail (due to insufficient funds) is correctly handled, ensuring that the system can gracefully handle execution failures.
2993-3000: The setup forTestLeaveGroupcorrectly initializes member addresses for testing the leave group functionality, ensuring that the system can handle members leaving groups as expected.
3006-3016: InTestLeaveGroup, the test cases correctly set up scenarios for members leaving groups with different configurations, ensuring that the system properly handles the removal of members from groups.
3184-3184: The setup forTestExecProposalsWhenMemberLeavesOrIsUpdatedcorrectly initializes proposer addresses for testing the impact of member updates and departures on proposal execution, ensuring that the system can handle these scenarios as expected.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
Review Status
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yml
Files selected for processing (2)
- x/group/CHANGELOG.md (1 hunks)
- x/group/simulation/operations.go (23 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- x/group/simulation/operations.go
Additional Context Used
Path-based Instructions (1)
x/group/CHANGELOG.md (1)
Pattern
**/*.md: "Assess the documentation for misspellings, grammatical errors, missing documentation and correctness"
Description
ref:
#13140
#7448
Author Checklist
All items are required. Please add a note to the item if the item is not applicable and
please add links to any relevant follow up issues.
I have...
!in the type prefix if API or client breaking changeCHANGELOG.mdReviewers Checklist
All items are required. Please add a note if the item is not applicable and please add
your handle next to the items reviewed if you only reviewed selected items.
I have...
Summary by CodeRabbit
AccAddressacross functions and tests for consistency.