tests(types/tx): Add unit tests for types/tx

[EmilGeorgiev]

Description

Closes: #XXXX

---

Author Checklist

All items are required. Please add a note to the item if the item is not applicable and
please add links to any relevant follow up issues.

I have...

• [ x] included the correct type prefix in the PR title
• [ x] confirmed ! in the type prefix if API or client breaking change
• [ x] targeted the correct branch (see PR Targeting)
• [ x] provided a link to the relevant issue or specification
• [ x] reviewed "Files changed" and left comments if necessary
• [ x] included the necessary unit and integration tests
• [x ] added a changelog entry to CHANGELOG.md
• [ x] updated the relevant documentation or specification, including comments for documenting Go code
• [ x] confirmed all CI checks have passed

Reviewers Checklist

All items are required. Please add a note if the item is not applicable and please add
your handle next to the items reviewed if you only reviewed selected items.

I have...

• confirmed the correct type prefix in the PR title
• confirmed all author checklist items have been addressed
• reviewed state machine logic, API design and naming, documentation is accurate, tests and test coverage

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Tests
  • Expanded test coverage for transaction validation, message extraction, and signer identification.

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

The addition of types_test.go in the tx package introduces comprehensive tests for transaction handling, including message validation and extraction, and signer identification. This enhancement aims to improve the robustness and reliability of transaction operations within the system.

Changes

File Path	Change Summary
types/tx/types_test.go	New tests for message validation and extraction, and signer identification in transactions. Includes dummy proto message types for testing.

Possibly related issues

• Add test for propagation of tx options to signing handlers #18143: The new tests in types_test.go might help ensure that transaction options are correctly propagated to signing handlers, addressing concerns about sensitive code testing.

---

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
  • Generate unit testing code for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
  • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger a review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

• You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
• Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
• If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 0

Out of diff range and nitpick comments (2)

types/tx/types_test.go (2)

20-75: The structure and coverage of TestTx_GetMsgs are well-implemented. Consider adding a comment explaining the use of panics in test cases, as it's generally good practice to avoid them unless absolutely necessary.

---

176-205: TestTx_GetSigners is implemented correctly for the given scenario. Consider adding more test cases to cover different configurations of transactions and signers for more comprehensive coverage.

[likhita-809]

few nits, otherwise lgtm

[sontrinh16]

beside above nit, lgtm