Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

perf: Make recheck not re-run validate basic #20208

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Apr 29, 2024

Conversation

ValarDragon
Copy link
Contributor

@ValarDragon ValarDragon commented Apr 29, 2024

Description

Make recheck Tx not re-run validate basic.

Important due to cometbft/cometbft#2925


Author Checklist

All items are required. Please add a note to the item if the item is not applicable and
please add links to any relevant follow up issues.

I have...

  • included the correct type prefix in the PR title
  • confirmed ! in the type prefix if API or client breaking change
  • targeted the correct branch (see PR Targeting)
  • provided a link to the relevant issue or specification
  • reviewed "Files changed" and left comments if necessary
  • included the necessary unit and integration tests
  • added a changelog entry to CHANGELOG.md
  • updated the relevant documentation or specification, including comments for documenting Go code
  • confirmed all CI checks have passed

Reviewers Checklist

All items are required. Please add a note if the item is not applicable and please add
your handle next to the items reviewed if you only reviewed selected items.

I have...

  • confirmed the correct type prefix in the PR title
  • confirmed all author checklist items have been addressed
  • reviewed state machine logic, API design and naming, documentation is accurate, tests and test coverage

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • Enhanced transaction validation based on execution mode to ensure security and integrity during processing.

@ValarDragon ValarDragon requested a review from a team as a code owner April 29, 2024 06:34
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Apr 29, 2024

Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The update enhances the BaseApp struct's runTx method by adding a conditional check based on the mode parameter to validate transaction messages before execution. This change improves transaction validation under specific conditions, enhancing security and efficiency in transaction processing.

Changes

File Change Summary
baseapp/baseapp.go Added a conditional check in runTx method to validate transaction messages based on mode.

Recent Review Details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yml
Review profile: CHILL

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between f390972 and 1525eb1.
Files selected for processing (2)
  • CHANGELOG.md (1 hunks)
  • baseapp/baseapp.go (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • baseapp/baseapp.go
Additional Context Used
Path-based Instructions (1)
CHANGELOG.md (1)

Pattern **/*.md: "Assess the documentation for misspellings, grammatical errors, missing documentation and correctness"

Additional comments not posted (1)
CHANGELOG.md (1)

97-97: The changelog entry clearly describes the change and correctly links to the PR. Good job on maintaining clarity and conciseness.


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger a review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@ValarDragon ValarDragon changed the title Make recheck not re-run validate basic perf: Make recheck not re-run validate basic Apr 29, 2024

This comment has been minimized.

Comment on lines 871 to 879
}

msgs := tx.GetMsgs()
if err := validateBasicTxMsgs(app.msgServiceRouter, msgs); err != nil {
return sdk.GasInfo{}, nil, nil, err
if mode != execModeReCheck {
if err := validateBasicTxMsgs(app.msgServiceRouter, msgs); err != nil {
return sdk.GasInfo{}, nil, nil, err
}
}

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Change potentially affects state.

Call sequence:

(*github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/baseapp.BaseApp).runTx (baseapp/baseapp.go:820)
(*github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/baseapp.BaseApp).deliverTx (baseapp/baseapp.go:750)
(*github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/baseapp.BaseApp).internalFinalizeBlock (baseapp/baseapp.go:713)
(*github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/baseapp.BaseApp).FinalizeBlock (baseapp/baseapp.go:874)

Comment on lines 871 to +879
}

msgs := tx.GetMsgs()
if err := validateBasicTxMsgs(app.msgServiceRouter, msgs); err != nil {
return sdk.GasInfo{}, nil, nil, err
// run validate basic if mode != recheck.
// as validate basic is stateless, it is guaranteed to pass recheck, given that its passed checkTx.
if mode != execModeReCheck {
if err := validateBasicTxMsgs(app.msgServiceRouter, msgs); err != nil {
return sdk.GasInfo{}, nil, nil, err
}
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Change potentially affects state.

Call sequence:

(*github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/baseapp.BaseApp).runTx (baseapp/baseapp.go:820)
(*github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/baseapp.BaseApp).deliverTx (baseapp/baseapp.go:750)
(*github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/baseapp.BaseApp).internalFinalizeBlock (baseapp/baseapp.go:713)
(*github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/baseapp.BaseApp).FinalizeBlock (baseapp/baseapp.go:874)

Copy link
Member

@facundomedica facundomedica left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, thank you!

@tac0turtle tac0turtle added this pull request to the merge queue Apr 29, 2024
Merged via the queue into main with commit 92ae885 Apr 29, 2024
63 checks passed
@tac0turtle tac0turtle deleted the dev/make_recheck_not_re_validate_basic branch April 29, 2024 08:17
meetrick pushed a commit to meetrick/cosmos-sdk that referenced this pull request Apr 29, 2024
@ValarDragon
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thank you for the quick merge!

mmsqe pushed a commit to mmsqe/cosmos-sdk that referenced this pull request Oct 25, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants