refactor(x/feegrant)!: audit QA v0.52 #21377
Conversation
WalkthroughWalkthroughThe changes across the Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant App as Application
participant Feegrant as Feegrant Module
participant Simulation as Simulation Functions
App->>Feegrant: Request Grant Allowance
Feegrant->>Simulation: Simulate Grant Allowance (no codec)
Simulation-->>Feegrant: Return Grant Result
Feegrant-->>App: Allowance Granted
App->>Feegrant: Request Revoke Allowance
Feegrant->>Simulation: Simulate Revoke Allowance (no codec)
Simulation-->>Feegrant: Return Revoke Result
Feegrant-->>App: Allowance Revoked
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add Documentation and Community
|
JulianToledano
added
the
backport/v0.52.x
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
Outside diff range, codebase verification and nitpick comments (1)
x/feegrant/keeper/msg_server_test.go (1)
Issue with Pruning Logic in
TestPruneAllowancesThe test function
TestPruneAllowancesconfirms that only 75 out of 76 allowances are pruned, leaving one allowance remaining. This indicates a potential issue with the pruning logic in thePruneAllowancesmethod.
- File:
x/feegrant/keeper/msg_server_test.go- Lines: 362-374
The test setup and assertions correctly identify this discrepancy, suggesting a need to review the
PruneAllowancesmethod for potential bugs or edge cases.Analysis chain
Line range hint
299-355: Verify pruning logic inTestPruneAllowances.The comment indicates that only 75 out of 76 allowances are pruned, which might suggest an issue in the logic.
Ensure that the test results align with the expected behavior.
Run the following script to verify the logic:Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify pruning logic in TestPruneAllowances. # Test: Search for the logic related to pruning allowances. Expect: Correct handling of expired allowances. rg --type go -A 10 $'func (suite *KeeperTestSuite) TestPruneAllowances()' | grep -E 'prune|count'Length of output: 98
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Capture the entire implementation of TestPruneAllowances to analyze the pruning logic. # Extract the full function implementation for TestPruneAllowances ast-grep --lang go --pattern 'func (suite *KeeperTestSuite) TestPruneAllowances() { $$$ }'Length of output: 4530
Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yml
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (16)
- tests/sims/feegrant/operations_test.go (4 hunks)
- x/feegrant/CHANGELOG.md (1 hunks)
- x/feegrant/basic_fee.go (1 hunks)
- x/feegrant/basic_fee_test.go (1 hunks)
- x/feegrant/client/cli/tx_test.go (1 hunks)
- x/feegrant/fees.go (1 hunks)
- x/feegrant/filtered_fee.go (4 hunks)
- x/feegrant/filtered_fee_test.go (1 hunks)
- x/feegrant/keeper/keeper.go (2 hunks)
- x/feegrant/keeper/keeper_test.go (6 hunks)
- x/feegrant/keeper/msg_server_test.go (12 hunks)
- x/feegrant/migrations/v2/store.go (2 hunks)
- x/feegrant/mock_test.go (1 hunks)
- x/feegrant/module/abci_test.go (1 hunks)
- x/feegrant/module/module.go (1 hunks)
- x/feegrant/simulation/operations.go (4 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (9)
- tests/sims/feegrant/operations_test.go
- x/feegrant/basic_fee.go
- x/feegrant/basic_fee_test.go
- x/feegrant/client/cli/tx_test.go
- x/feegrant/fees.go
- x/feegrant/filtered_fee_test.go
- x/feegrant/keeper/keeper_test.go
- x/feegrant/migrations/v2/store.go
- x/feegrant/mock_test.go
Additional context used
Path-based instructions (7)
x/feegrant/module/abci_test.go (2)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.
Pattern
**/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"x/feegrant/CHANGELOG.md (1)
Pattern
**/*.md: "Assess the documentation for misspellings, grammatical errors, missing documentation and correctness"x/feegrant/filtered_fee.go (1)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.x/feegrant/module/module.go (1)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.x/feegrant/simulation/operations.go (1)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.x/feegrant/keeper/keeper.go (1)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.x/feegrant/keeper/msg_server_test.go (2)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.
Pattern
**/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"
LanguageTool
x/feegrant/CHANGELOG.md
[uncategorized] ~35-~35: This verb does not appear to agree with the subject. Consider using a different form.
Context: ...SimulateMsgRevokeAllowanceno longer require aProtoCodecparameter. * `Weighted...(AI_EN_LECTOR_REPLACEMENT_VERB_AGREEMENT)
Markdownlint
x/feegrant/CHANGELOG.md
35-35: Expected: 4; Actual: 2
Unordered list indentation(MD007, ul-indent)
36-36: Expected: 4; Actual: 2
Unordered list indentation(MD007, ul-indent)
Additional comments not posted (11)
x/feegrant/module/abci_test.go (2)
92-99: LGTM! Improved test structure.The consolidation of
queryRequestand the rearrangement of operations enhance readability and maintainability.
96-111: Verify test coverage.Ensure that the test covers all scenarios, including edge cases for allowance pruning.
Run the following script to check for additional test functions related to feegrant pruning:
Verification successful
Test Coverage Verified for Feegrant Pruning
The
TestFeegrantPruningfunction adequately covers the scenarios for feegrant pruning, including the handling of expired allowances. The test verifies the expected behavior by checking the number of allowances before and after pruning operations.
- The test includes allowances with expiration and spend limits.
- It ensures that expired allowances are pruned correctly.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for additional test functions related to feegrant pruning. # Test: Search for test functions in the module. Expect: Comprehensive coverage. rg --type go -A 5 'func TestFeegrantPruning'Length of output: 577
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Extract the full implementation of the TestFeegrantPruning function to verify its coverage. ast-grep --lang go --pattern 'func TestFeegrantPruning($$$) { $$$ }'Length of output: 6004
x/feegrant/filtered_fee.go (3)
66-72: LGTM! Improved clarity inSetAllowance.The separation of error handling from the assignment operation enhances clarity.
Line range hint
100-111: LGTM! Optimized data structure inallowedMsgsToMap.The change to
map[string]struct{}is a common practice to save memory.
131-131: Verify logic correctness inallMsgTypesAllowed.Ensure that the change in map lookup logic maintains the intended functionality.
Run the following script to check for test functions covering
allMsgTypesAllowed:Verification successful
Logic Correctness Verified in
allMsgTypesAllowed: The logic change in the map lookup withinallMsgTypesAllowedis likely covered by existing tests forAllowedMsgAllowance. These tests are found inx/feegrant/filtered_fee_test.goand should ensure that the intended functionality is maintained.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for test functions covering `allMsgTypesAllowed`. # Test: Search for test functions in the module. Expect: Comprehensive coverage. rg --type go -A 5 'allMsgTypesAllowed'Length of output: 840
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for test functions related to `AllowedMsgAllowance` to find indirect tests for `allMsgTypesAllowed`. # Test: Search for test functions in the module. Expect: Comprehensive coverage. rg --type go -A 5 'AllowedMsgAllowance'Length of output: 43384
x/feegrant/module/module.go (1)
173-174: Verify the correctness of parameter removal inWeightedOperations.The removal of
am.registryandsimState.Cdcsimplifies the function call. Ensure that these parameters are no longer required by thesimulation.WeightedOperationsfunction.Run the following script to confirm the function signature and usage:
Verification successful
Verified: Parameter removal in
WeightedOperationsis correct.The parameters
am.registryandsimState.Cdcare not required by theWeightedOperationsfunction inx/feegrant/simulation/operations.go. The function signature confirms that these parameters have been correctly removed.
- The function signature includes
appParams,txConfig,ak,bk, andk, matching the updated call.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the function signature and usage of `simulation.WeightedOperations`. # Test: Search for the function definition and usage. Expect: No requirement for `registry` and `Cdc`. ast-grep --lang go --pattern 'func WeightedOperations($_, $_, $_, $_, $_) simulation.WeightedOperations'Length of output: 4048
x/feegrant/simulation/operations.go (1)
55-59: Verify the removal of codec parameters inSimulateMsgGrantAllowanceandSimulateMsgRevokeAllowance.The removal of the codec parameter simplifies the function calls. Ensure that these functions do not require the codec for their operations.
Run the following script to confirm the function signatures and usage:
Verification successful
Codec parameters successfully removed from function calls.
The functions
SimulateMsgGrantAllowanceandSimulateMsgRevokeAllowanceno longer require codec parameters, simplifying their usage. The codec is not used in their operations.
SimulateMsgGrantAllowanceandSimulateMsgRevokeAllowancedo not include codec parameters in their signatures.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the function signatures and usage of `SimulateMsgGrantAllowance` and `SimulateMsgRevokeAllowance`. # Test: Search for the function definitions and usage. Expect: No requirement for codec parameters. ast-grep --lang go --pattern 'func SimulateMsgGrantAllowance($_, $_, $_, $_) simtypes.Operation' ast-grep --lang go --pattern 'func SimulateMsgRevokeAllowance($_, $_, $_, $_) simtypes.Operation'Length of output: 9563
x/feegrant/keeper/keeper.go (2)
193-193: Clarify the documentation forGetAllowance.The updated documentation now correctly indicates that
collections.ErrNotFoundis returned when no allowance exists. Ensure that this behavior is consistently implemented and documented across the codebase.
233-242: RefactorUseGrantedFeesfor improved clarity.The refactor separates the revocation logic from the event emission logic, enhancing readability. Ensure that the functionality remains correct and consistent with the intended behavior.
x/feegrant/keeper/msg_server_test.go (2)
Line range hint
32-44: Improved readability with structured test cases.The refactoring to use structured test cases with named fields enhances clarity and maintainability.
Ensure that all edge cases are covered in the tests.
Run the following script to verify the test coverage:
Also applies to: 47-59, 62-89, 92-106, 109-123, 126-140, 143-160, 163-182, 185-202
228-235: Improved readability with structured test cases.The refactoring to use structured test cases with named fields enhances clarity and maintainability.
Ensure that all edge cases are covered in the tests.
Run the following script to verify the test coverage:
Also applies to: 238-245, 248-255, 258-287, 290-297
Verification successful
Comprehensive test coverage verified for
TestRevokeAllowance.The
TestRevokeAllowancefunction includes structured test cases that cover various scenarios, ensuring thorough testing of the functionality. The original review comment's suggestion to verify test coverage is satisfied.
- Test cases include scenarios for invalid granter, invalid grantee, fee allowance not found, successful revocation, and checking fee allowance revoked.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify test coverage for TestRevokeAllowance. # Test: Search for all test cases in TestRevokeAllowance. Expect: Comprehensive coverage. rg --type go -A 5 $'func (suite *KeeperTestSuite) TestRevokeAllowance()' | grep -E 'name:'Length of output: 89
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check if the TestRevokeAllowance function exists in the codebase and gather its structure. ast-grep --lang go --pattern 'func (suite *KeeperTestSuite) TestRevokeAllowance() { $$$ }'Length of output: 6575
| @@ -28,7 +28,6 @@ import ( | |||
|
|
|||
| "github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/client" | |||
| "github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/codec" | |||
| codecaddress "github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/codec/address" | |||
JulianToledano
changed the title
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yml
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (1)
- x/feegrant/keeper/keeper.go (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- x/feegrant/keeper/keeper.go
(cherry picked from commit 59e0a3d)
Description
Ref:
#20955
Author Checklist
All items are required. Please add a note to the item if the item is not applicable and
please add links to any relevant follow up issues.
I have...
!in the type prefix if API or client breaking changeCHANGELOG.mdReviewers Checklist
All items are required. Please add a note if the item is not applicable and please add
your handle next to the items reviewed if you only reviewed selected items.
Please see Pull Request Reviewer section in the contributing guide for more information on how to review a pull request.
I have...
Summary by CodeRabbit
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Refactor
Documentation