Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

refactor(x/consensus): audit QA v0.52 #21416

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 27, 2024

Conversation

JulianToledano
Copy link
Contributor

@JulianToledano JulianToledano commented Aug 27, 2024

Description


Author Checklist

All items are required. Please add a note to the item if the item is not applicable and
please add links to any relevant follow up issues.

I have...

  • included the correct type prefix in the PR title, you can find examples of the prefixes below:
  • confirmed ! in the type prefix if API or client breaking change
  • targeted the correct branch (see PR Targeting)
  • provided a link to the relevant issue or specification
  • reviewed "Files changed" and left comments if necessary
  • included the necessary unit and integration tests
  • added a changelog entry to CHANGELOG.md
  • updated the relevant documentation or specification, including comments for documenting Go code
  • confirmed all CI checks have passed

Reviewers Checklist

All items are required. Please add a note if the item is not applicable and please add
your handle next to the items reviewed if you only reviewed selected items.

Please see Pull Request Reviewer section in the contributing guide for more information on how to review a pull request.

I have...

  • confirmed the correct type prefix in the PR title
  • confirmed all author checklist items have been addressed
  • reviewed state machine logic, API design and naming, documentation is accurate, tests and test coverage

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation

    • Updated URLs in the consensus module documentation to point to the correct version of Protocol Buffer definitions.
    • Removed outdated sections regarding "Consensus Messages" for improved clarity.
    • Enhanced comments in the Keeper struct for better understanding of functionality and error handling.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Simplified test cases by removing redundant variable declarations and error handling fields, improving maintainability.
  • Style

    • Improved code documentation with additional comments for clarity and understanding of methods.

@JulianToledano JulianToledano added the backport/v0.52.x PR scheduled for inclusion in the v0.52's next stable release label Aug 27, 2024
@JulianToledano JulianToledano requested a review from a team as a code owner August 27, 2024 10:12
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Aug 27, 2024

Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The changes involve updates to the consensus module's documentation and code structure. Key modifications include URL updates in the README, formatting changes to the ConsensusParamSetter interface, enhancements in the Keeper struct with new comments and improved error handling, simplifications in the test suite, and additional comments for clarity in various functions. These updates aim to improve clarity and maintainability without altering the core functionality.

Changes

File Change Summary
x/consensus/README.md Updated URLs to Protocol Buffer definitions and removed "Consensus Messages" section.
x/consensus/exported/exported.go Simplified formatting of the ConsensusParamSetter interface declaration.
x/consensus/keeper/keeper.go Added comments to NewKeeper, GetAuthority, and UpdateParams; improved error handling in InitGenesis.
x/consensus/keeper/keeper_test.go Removed redundant variable declarations and simplified test cases in TestGRPCQueryConsensusParams and TestUpdateParams.
x/consensus/types/codec.go Added comment to RegisterInterfaces function for clarity.
x/consensus/types/msgs.go Added comment block to ToProtoConsensusParams method clarifying functionality and error handling.

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yml
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 355f748 and c395882.

Files selected for processing (6)
  • x/consensus/README.md (2 hunks)
  • x/consensus/exported/exported.go (1 hunks)
  • x/consensus/keeper/keeper.go (4 hunks)
  • x/consensus/keeper/keeper_test.go (13 hunks)
  • x/consensus/types/codec.go (1 hunks)
  • x/consensus/types/msgs.go (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (4)
  • x/consensus/exported/exported.go
  • x/consensus/keeper/keeper_test.go
  • x/consensus/types/codec.go
  • x/consensus/types/msgs.go
Additional context used
Path-based instructions (2)
x/consensus/README.md (1)

Pattern **/*.md: "Assess the documentation for misspellings, grammatical errors, missing documentation and correctness"

x/consensus/keeper/keeper.go (1)

Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.

Additional comments not posted (7)
x/consensus/README.md (2)

34-34: URL update is appropriate.

The URL now points to the correct version of the Protocol Buffer definitions.

The code changes are approved.


48-48: URL update is appropriate.

The URL now points to the correct version of the Protocol Buffer definitions.

The code changes are approved.

x/consensus/keeper/keeper.go (5)

32-32: Comment addition is appropriate.

The comment clarifies the purpose of the NewKeeper function, improving readability and maintainability.

The code changes are approved.


42-43: Comment addition is appropriate.

The comments clarify the purpose of the GetAuthority function, improving readability and maintainability.

The code changes are approved.


51-51: Error handling improvement is appropriate.

The consolidated checks streamline the logic and enhance readability, improving maintainability.

The code changes are approved.


87-87: Comment addition is appropriate.

The comment clarifies the purpose of the UpdateParams function, improving readability and maintainability.

The code changes are approved.


120-127: Error handling adjustment is appropriate.

The restructured flow of error checks ensures that the retrieval of parameters from ParamsStore is handled more cleanly, improving maintainability.

The code changes are approved.

@JulianToledano JulianToledano added this pull request to the merge queue Aug 27, 2024
Merged via the queue into main with commit 8e0efbd Aug 27, 2024
77 checks passed
@JulianToledano JulianToledano deleted the julian/consensus-v0.52-audit branch August 27, 2024 11:27
mergify bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 27, 2024
julienrbrt pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 27, 2024
Co-authored-by: Julián Toledano <JulianToledano@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
backport/v0.52.x PR scheduled for inclusion in the v0.52's next stable release C:x/consensus
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants