-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.6k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
refactor(x/consensus): audit QA v0.52 #21416
Conversation
WalkthroughWalkthroughThe changes involve updates to the consensus module's documentation and code structure. Key modifications include URL updates in the README, formatting changes to the Changes
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add Documentation and Community
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yml
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (6)
- x/consensus/README.md (2 hunks)
- x/consensus/exported/exported.go (1 hunks)
- x/consensus/keeper/keeper.go (4 hunks)
- x/consensus/keeper/keeper_test.go (13 hunks)
- x/consensus/types/codec.go (1 hunks)
- x/consensus/types/msgs.go (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (4)
- x/consensus/exported/exported.go
- x/consensus/keeper/keeper_test.go
- x/consensus/types/codec.go
- x/consensus/types/msgs.go
Additional context used
Path-based instructions (2)
x/consensus/README.md (1)
Pattern
**/*.md
: "Assess the documentation for misspellings, grammatical errors, missing documentation and correctness"x/consensus/keeper/keeper.go (1)
Pattern
**/*.go
: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.
Additional comments not posted (7)
x/consensus/README.md (2)
34-34
: URL update is appropriate.The URL now points to the correct version of the Protocol Buffer definitions.
The code changes are approved.
48-48
: URL update is appropriate.The URL now points to the correct version of the Protocol Buffer definitions.
The code changes are approved.
x/consensus/keeper/keeper.go (5)
32-32
: Comment addition is appropriate.The comment clarifies the purpose of the
NewKeeper
function, improving readability and maintainability.The code changes are approved.
42-43
: Comment addition is appropriate.The comments clarify the purpose of the
GetAuthority
function, improving readability and maintainability.The code changes are approved.
51-51
: Error handling improvement is appropriate.The consolidated checks streamline the logic and enhance readability, improving maintainability.
The code changes are approved.
87-87
: Comment addition is appropriate.The comment clarifies the purpose of the
UpdateParams
function, improving readability and maintainability.The code changes are approved.
120-127
: Error handling adjustment is appropriate.The restructured flow of error checks ensures that the retrieval of parameters from
ParamsStore
is handled more cleanly, improving maintainability.The code changes are approved.
(cherry picked from commit 8e0efbd)
Description
Author Checklist
All items are required. Please add a note to the item if the item is not applicable and
please add links to any relevant follow up issues.
I have...
!
in the type prefix if API or client breaking changeCHANGELOG.md
Reviewers Checklist
All items are required. Please add a note if the item is not applicable and please add
your handle next to the items reviewed if you only reviewed selected items.
Please see Pull Request Reviewer section in the contributing guide for more information on how to review a pull request.
I have...
Summary by CodeRabbit
Documentation
Bug Fixes
Style