Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

refactor(x/slashing): audit QA #21477

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Sep 2, 2024
Merged

refactor(x/slashing): audit QA #21477

merged 2 commits into from
Sep 2, 2024

Conversation

akhilkumarpilli
Copy link
Contributor

@akhilkumarpilli akhilkumarpilli commented Aug 30, 2024

Description

ref: #20955


Author Checklist

All items are required. Please add a note to the item if the item is not applicable and
please add links to any relevant follow up issues.

I have...

  • included the correct type prefix in the PR title, you can find examples of the prefixes below:
  • confirmed ! in the type prefix if API or client breaking change
  • targeted the correct branch (see PR Targeting)
  • provided a link to the relevant issue or specification
  • reviewed "Files changed" and left comments if necessary
  • included the necessary unit and integration tests
  • added a changelog entry to CHANGELOG.md
  • updated the relevant documentation or specification, including comments for documenting Go code
  • confirmed all CI checks have passed

Reviewers Checklist

All items are required. Please add a note if the item is not applicable and please add
your handle next to the items reviewed if you only reviewed selected items.

Please see Pull Request Reviewer section in the contributing guide for more information on how to review a pull request.

I have...

  • confirmed the correct type prefix in the PR title
  • confirmed all author checklist items have been addressed
  • reviewed state machine logic, API design and naming, documentation is accurate, tests and test coverage

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Enhanced modularization of the Cosmos SDK, improving organization and functionality.
    • Updated handling of validator signing information, now accepting strings for improved flexibility.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Corrected grammatical errors in documentation for clarity and professionalism.
  • Documentation

    • Improved comments and documentation across multiple modules for better understanding and specificity.
  • Chores

    • Refined code practices by using constants instead of hardcoded strings to enhance maintainability.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Aug 30, 2024

Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The changes in the Cosmos SDK involve the removal and migration of several modules, including the relocation of the Groups, Gov, and Distribution modules to separate go.mod files. Key message types like MsgDeposit, MsgRedelegateExec, and MsgUnbondExec have been removed due to AutoCLI migration. The NewValidatorSigningInfo function now accepts strings instead of sdk.AccAddress, and various documentation updates have been made to improve clarity.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
CHANGELOG.md Summary of significant updates including module removals and parameter changes.
x/slashing/CHANGELOG.md Significant modifications to validator address handling and migration function requirements.
x/slashing/README.md Minor grammatical correction in documentation.
x/slashing/keeper/hooks.go Updated comments for clarity on the AfterConsensusPubKeyUpdate function.
x/slashing/keeper/infractions.go Clarified comments in HandleValidatorSignature functions and corrected grammatical errors.
x/slashing/keeper/signing_info.go Enhanced clarity of comments regarding methods in the Keeper struct.
x/slashing/keeper/signing_info_test.go Minor comment clarifications and grammatical corrections in test functions.
x/slashing/module.go Improved comments to specify methods related to the slashing module.
x/slashing/simulation/proposals.go Changed variable definition to use types.GovModuleName for maintainability.
x/slashing/simulation/proposals_test.go Updated module address retrieval to use a constant instead of a hardcoded string.

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.
Early access features: disabled

We are currently testing the following features in early access:

  • Anthropic claude-3-5-sonnet for code reviews: Anthropic claims that the new Claude model has stronger code understanding and code generation capabilities than their previous models. Note: Our default code review model was also updated late last week. Please compare the quality of the reviews between the two models by toggling the early access feature.

Note:

  • You can enable or disable early access features from the CodeRabbit UI or by updating the CodeRabbit configuration file.
  • Please join our Discord Community to provide feedback and report issues on the discussion post.

@akhilkumarpilli akhilkumarpilli mentioned this pull request Aug 30, 2024
28 tasks
@julienrbrt julienrbrt added the backport/v0.52.x PR scheduled for inclusion in the v0.52's next stable release label Aug 30, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Outside diff range, codebase verification and nitpick comments (1)
CHANGELOG.md (1)

Line range hint 1-1: Reminder: Add tests

This TODO comment indicates that unit tests still need to be added for this module. Adding comprehensive tests is important for ensuring code quality and preventing regressions.

Do you want me to help generate some test cases to get you started? I'd be happy to draft the basic structure and some initial test cases. Just let me know!

Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yml
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between efb11b3 and 310b6af.

Files selected for processing (10)
  • CHANGELOG.md (1 hunks)
  • x/slashing/CHANGELOG.md (1 hunks)
  • x/slashing/README.md (1 hunks)
  • x/slashing/keeper/hooks.go (1 hunks)
  • x/slashing/keeper/infractions.go (3 hunks)
  • x/slashing/keeper/signing_info.go (5 hunks)
  • x/slashing/keeper/signing_info_test.go (2 hunks)
  • x/slashing/module.go (1 hunks)
  • x/slashing/simulation/proposals.go (1 hunks)
  • x/slashing/simulation/proposals_test.go (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (6)
  • x/slashing/README.md
  • x/slashing/keeper/hooks.go
  • x/slashing/keeper/infractions.go
  • x/slashing/keeper/signing_info.go
  • x/slashing/keeper/signing_info_test.go
  • x/slashing/module.go
Additional context used
Path-based instructions (4)
x/slashing/simulation/proposals_test.go (2)

Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.


Pattern **/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"

x/slashing/simulation/proposals.go (1)

Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.

x/slashing/CHANGELOG.md (1)

Pattern **/*.md: "Assess the documentation for misspellings, grammatical errors, missing documentation and correctness"

CHANGELOG.md (1)

Pattern **/*.md: "Assess the documentation for misspellings, grammatical errors, missing documentation and correctness"

Additional comments not posted (5)
x/slashing/simulation/proposals_test.go (1)

43-43: LGTM!

The change improves code readability and maintainability by using the GovModuleName constant instead of a hardcoded string literal. This aligns with the Uber Go Style Guide's recommendation to use constants for string literals.

x/slashing/simulation/proposals.go (1)

39-39: LGTM!

The change enhances maintainability and clarity by utilizing the types.GovModuleName constant instead of a hardcoded string literal. This improves consistency across the codebase and reduces the risk of errors associated with string literals. The overall functionality of the SimulateMsgUpdateParams function remains intact, and the change reflects a shift towards better coding practices.

x/slashing/CHANGELOG.md (1)

42-42: The changelog entry is accurate.

The changelog entry accurately reflects the change in the NewValidatorSigningInfo function signature, which now accepts strings instead of sdk.AccAddress. This change is also mentioned in the list of alterations and the AI-generated summary provides additional context about the implications of this change.

CHANGELOG.md (2)

Line range hint 1-1: Looks good!

This heading appropriately indicates the new v0.50.0 version of the Cosmos SDK.


Line range hint 3-5: Informational note looks good!

This note appropriately highlights the significance of the v0.50.0 release and directs readers to the changelog and release notes for important details on breaking changes. Well written.

@julienrbrt
Copy link
Member

Still going to review this, but I've assigned the codeowners instead.

Copy link
Member

@julienrbrt julienrbrt left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ACK.

@akhilkumarpilli akhilkumarpilli added this pull request to the merge queue Sep 2, 2024
Merged via the queue into main with commit 496cd0d Sep 2, 2024
76 checks passed
@akhilkumarpilli akhilkumarpilli deleted the akhil/slashing-audit branch September 2, 2024 11:18
mergify bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 2, 2024
julienrbrt pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 2, 2024
Co-authored-by: Akhil Kumar P <36399231+akhilkumarpilli@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
backport/v0.52.x PR scheduled for inclusion in the v0.52's next stable release C:Simulations C:x/slashing
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants