feat(collections): Multi RefKeys method and reverse Triple iterator support #21496
Conversation
oren-lava
requested review from
testinginprod,
facundomedica and
a team
as code owners
|
Caution Review failedThe pull request is closed. 📝 Walkthrough📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe changes introduce a new Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
![github-advanced-security[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/57789?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Outside diff range, codebase verification and nitpick comments (1)
collections/indexes/multi.go (1)
128-158: LGTM! Consider adding documentation comments.The
RefKeysmethod is well-implemented and handles both unique and non-unique scenarios effectively. The sanity check is a good practice to prevent misuse of the method.To improve the usability of the method, consider adding documentation comments to explain its usage and behavior. For example:
// RefKeys returns a list of all the MultiIterator's reference keys. // If the "unique" argument is enabled, it returns a unique list of reference keys. // Note: The reference key type must be comparable when using the "unique" option. func (m *Multi[ReferenceKey, PrimaryKey, Value]) RefKeys(ctx context.Context, unique bool) ([]ReferenceKey, error) { // ... }
Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yml
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (4)
- collections/indexes/multi.go (2 hunks)
- collections/indexes/multi_test.go (2 hunks)
- collections/triple.go (1 hunks)
- collections/triple_test.go (2 hunks)
Additional context used
Path-based instructions (4)
collections/triple_test.go (2)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.
Pattern
**/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"collections/indexes/multi_test.go (2)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.
Pattern
**/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"collections/indexes/multi.go (1)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.collections/triple.go (1)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.
GitHub Check: CodeQL
collections/indexes/multi.go
[notice] 7-7: Sensitive package import
Certain system packages contain functions which may be a possible source of non-determinism
Additional comments not posted (10)
collections/triple_test.go (4)
10-10: LGTM!The import of the
coretestingpackage is necessary for using thecoretesting.Context()andcoretesting.KVStoreService()functions in the test.
42-56: LGTM!The changes enhance the test coverage by validating the new reverse iteration feature for the
NewPrefixedTripleRangefunction. The test cases are correctly implemented and cover both the default and reverse iteration scenarios.
59-59: LGTM!The change updates the call to
NewSuperPrefixedTripleRangeto include the newreverseparameter set tofalse, which is necessary to match the updated function signature and maintain the default iteration order.
65-73: LGTM!The changes enhance the test coverage by validating the new reverse iteration feature for the
NewSuperPrefixedTripleRangefunction. The test case is correctly implemented and covers the reverse iteration scenario.collections/indexes/multi_test.go (2)
29-35: LGTM!The test code correctly verifies the behavior of the
RefKeysmethod by:
- Retrieving reference keys without filtering and expecting two instances of "milan".
- Retrieving reference keys with filtering and expecting a single instance of "milan".
The code changes are approved.
54-57: LGTM!The test code correctly verifies the behavior of the
RefKeysmethod after a reference update operation by expecting to see both "milan" and "new york" as valid reference keys.The code changes are approved.
collections/triple.go (4)
278-286: LGTM!The changes to introduce the
reverseparameter and conditionally set theordervariable look good. This is a useful enhancement that allows for specifying the order of the range. The implementation is straightforward and maintains the existing coding style.
292-301: LGTM!The changes to introduce the
reverseparameter and conditionally set theordervariable are consistent with the updates made toNewPrefixUntilTripleRange. The implementation is straightforward and maintains the existing coding style.
307-316: LGTM!The changes to introduce the
reverseparameter and conditionally set theordervariable are consistent with the updates made to the other range functions. The implementation is straightforward and maintains the existing coding style.
Line range hint
1-318: Conforms to the Uber Go Style GuideThe Go code in this file follows the naming conventions, formatting, and code organization recommended by the Uber Go Style Guide. The changes introduced are consistent with the existing style and conventions used throughout the file. No deviations from the style guide were observed.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yml
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (4)
- collections/indexes/multi.go (2 hunks)
- collections/indexes/multi_test.go (2 hunks)
- collections/triple.go (1 hunks)
- collections/triple_test.go (2 hunks)
Additional context used
Path-based instructions (4)
collections/triple_test.go (2)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.
Pattern
**/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"collections/indexes/multi_test.go (2)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.
Pattern
**/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"collections/indexes/multi.go (1)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.collections/triple.go (1)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.
GitHub Check: CodeQL
collections/indexes/multi.go
[notice] 7-7: Sensitive package import
Certain system packages contain functions which may be a possible source of non-determinism
Additional comments not posted (8)
collections/triple_test.go (2)
42-56: Review of reverse iteration functionality inNewPrefixedTripleRange.The test case for
NewPrefixedTripleRangewith the reverse flag set totruecorrectly verifies that the keys are returned in reverse order. The use ofrequire.Equalto compare the keys ensures that the test will accurately reflect discrepancies in the order of keys.This test effectively validates the new functionality, ensuring that the reverse iteration works as expected.
59-73: Review of reverse iteration functionality inNewSuperPrefixedTripleRange.The test case for
NewSuperPrefixedTripleRangewith the reverse flag set totruecorrectly checks that the keys are returned in reverse order. The loop at lines 71-72 effectively compares each key against the expected key in reverse order, ensuring that the functionality behaves as intended.This test is well-constructed and confirms that the reverse iteration feature is implemented correctly.
collections/indexes/multi_test.go (2)
29-35: LGTM!The test cases correctly validate the behavior of the
RefKeysmethod with and without filtering.
54-57: LGTM!The assertion correctly validates that the reference keys are updated after the replace operation.
collections/indexes/multi.go (1)
128-158: LGTM!The
RefKeysmethod is well-implemented with proper error handling and comments. The logic for handling duplicates using a map to track visited keys is efficient.collections/triple.go (3)
278-286: Approve the changes toNewPrefixUntilTripleRange.The addition of the
reverseparameter is implemented correctly, allowing the function to handle both ascending and descending orders based on the parameter. It's recommended to add documentation to explain the purpose and effect of thereverseparameter to aid users in understanding its usage.
292-301: Approve the changes toNewPrefixedTripleRange.The implementation of the
reverseparameter is consistent and correct, allowing the function to handle both ascending and descending orders. Similar to the previous function, adding documentation for thereverseparameter would be beneficial for users.
307-316: Approve the changes toNewSuperPrefixedTripleRange.The implementation of the
reverseparameter is consistent and correct across all modified functions. Adding documentation for thereverseparameter would enhance user understanding and ensure correct usage.
oren-lava
requested review from
JulianToledano,
ziscky,
cool-develope and
alpe
as code owners
github-actions
bot
added
C:x/staking
C:x/distribution
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Outside diff range, codebase verification and nitpick comments (4)
x/staking/keeper/query_utils.go (1)
110-110: LGTM! Consider adding a comment to clarify the purpose of the new argument.The code change looks good. The addition of the
falseargument tocollections.NewPrefixedTripleRangeis likely used to control the order of the range query results. Setting it tofalsesuggests that the results will be returned in the default ascending order.To improve code readability, consider adding a comment to clarify the purpose of the new argument. For example:
// Set the second argument to false to return the results in ascending order rng := collections.NewPrefixedTripleRange[[]byte, []byte, []byte](delegator, false)x/staking/keeper/delegation.go (3)
424-424: [Nitpick] Clarify the impact and motivation behind thefalseparameter.The addition of the
falseparameter tocollections.NewPrefixedTripleRangesuggests a change in the underlying logic for handling the range. This may influence the behavior of theGetRedelegationsmethod in terms of data retrieval capabilities or performance characteristics.Please provide clarification on:
- The motivation behind adding the
falseparameter.- The implications of this change on the method's behavior and performance.
444-444: [Nitpick] Clarify the impact and motivation behind thefalseparameter.The addition of the
falseparameter tocollections.NewPrefixedTripleRangesuggests a change in the underlying logic for handling the range. This may influence the behavior of theGetRedelegationsFromSrcValidatormethod in terms of data retrieval capabilities or performance characteristics.Please provide clarification on:
- The motivation behind adding the
falseparameter.- The implications of this change on the method's behavior and performance.
465-465: [Nitpick] Clarify the impact and motivation behind thefalseparameter.The addition of the
falseparameter tocollections.NewSuperPrefixedTripleRangesuggests a change in the underlying logic for handling the range. This may influence the behavior of theHasReceivingRedelegationmethod in terms of data retrieval capabilities or performance characteristics.Please provide clarification on:
- The motivation behind adding the
falseparameter.- The implications of this change on the method's behavior and performance.
Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yml
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (5)
- collections/README.md (2 hunks)
- x/distribution/keeper/hooks.go (1 hunks)
- x/feegrant/keeper/keeper.go (1 hunks)
- x/staking/keeper/delegation.go (3 hunks)
- x/staking/keeper/query_utils.go (1 hunks)
Additional context used
Path-based instructions (5)
x/staking/keeper/query_utils.go (1)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.x/distribution/keeper/hooks.go (1)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.x/feegrant/keeper/keeper.go (1)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.x/staking/keeper/delegation.go (1)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.collections/README.md (1)
Pattern
**/*.md: "Assess the documentation for misspellings, grammatical errors, missing documentation and correctness"
Additional comments not posted (4)
x/distribution/keeper/hooks.go (1)
113-113: Verify the purpose and impact of the additional parameter inNewPrefixedTripleRange.The change introduces an additional boolean parameter
falseto theNewPrefixedTripleRangefunction when calling theClearmethod ofValidatorSlashEvents. This suggests a refinement in how validator slash events are managed and could influence the outcome of theClearoperation.To ensure that the change aligns with the intended behavior, please verify the following:
- What is the purpose of the additional boolean parameter in
NewPrefixedTripleRange?- How does this parameter affect the behavior of the range being cleared?
- Confirm that the change produces the desired outcome in terms of managing validator slash events.
You can use the following script to analyze the usage of
NewPrefixedTripleRangeand its impact on theClearoperation:Examining the results will provide insights into how the additional parameter is used and its effect on the clearing of validator slash events.
Verification successful
The additional boolean parameter in
NewPrefixedTripleRangedetermines the order of the range.The boolean parameter added to
NewPrefixedTripleRangespecifies the order in which the range is processed:falsefor ascending andtruefor descending. In the context ofValidatorSlashEvents.Clear, setting this parameter tofalseensures that the slash events are cleared in ascending order. This change likely aligns with the intended behavior if the order of clearing is crucial for the operation's logic. Please verify that this order is necessary for maintaining consistency or correctness in managing validator slash events.
- File:
x/distribution/keeper/hooks.go- Line: 113
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for usage of NewPrefixedTripleRange rg --type go --context 5 'NewPrefixedTripleRange' # Search for Clear method calls on ValidatorSlashEvents rg --type go --context 5 'ValidatorSlashEvents.Clear'Length of output: 6295
x/feegrant/keeper/keeper.go (1)
297-297: Clarify the impact of the boolean parameter inNewPrefixUntilTripleRange.The addition of the
falseparameter to theNewPrefixUntilTripleRangefunction call changes the behavior of the range used to identify expired allowances. It's important to clarify whether this change to an exclusive endpoint was intended and to verify that it aligns with the expected functionality of theRemoveExpiredAllowancesmethod.Verification successful
The
reverseparameter inNewPrefixUntilTripleRangeaffects range order, not inclusivity.The addition of the
falseparameter to theNewPrefixUntilTripleRangefunction call specifies that the range should be in ascending order. This change aligns with the expected behavior of iterating over expired allowances chronologically and does not impact the functionality of theRemoveExpiredAllowancesmethod. No further action is needed regarding this change.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the behavior of the `NewPrefixUntilTripleRange` function with the `false` parameter. # Test: Search for the function definition and usage. Expect: Documentation or comments explaining the parameter's impact. rg --type go -A 5 $'NewPrefixUntilTripleRange'Length of output: 1135
collections/README.md (2)
1169-1169: Verify the new boolean parameter in function calls.The addition of a new boolean parameter to the
NewPrefixedTripleRangefunction call in theRedelegationsByDelegatormethod should be verified for correctness and intended behavior. This change is crucial as it likely alters how the range generation for redelegations is handled.
1178-1178: Verify the new boolean parameter in function calls.Similarly, the addition of a new boolean parameter to the
NewSuperPrefixedTripleRangefunction call in theRedelegationsByDelegatorAndValidatormethod should be verified. This parameter affects the behavior of the range generation, which is critical for the correct processing of redelegations.Verification successful
Verification of the boolean parameter in
NewSuperPrefixedTripleRangeis complete.The boolean parameter in the
NewSuperPrefixedTripleRangefunction affects the order of the range, which is crucial for redelegation processing. It is used inx/staking/keeper/delegation.gowith the parameter set tofalse, indicating ascending order. The functionality is also tested for both ascending and descending orders incollections/triple_test.go. The impact of the parameter is verified and aligns with the intended behavior.
x/staking/keeper/delegation.go: Usage withfalsefor ascending order.collections/triple_test.go: Tests for bothtrueandfalsevalues.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the new boolean parameter in function calls within the `RedelegationsByDelegatorAndValidator` method. # Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Only occurrences of the new signature. rg --type markdown -A 5 $'NewSuperPrefixedTripleRange'Length of output: 465
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Find the implementation of the NewSuperPrefixedTripleRange function ast-grep --lang go --pattern 'func NewSuperPrefixedTripleRange[$$$]($_, $_, $_) $_ { $$$ }' # Locate the RedelegationsByDelegatorAndValidator method to examine its usage of NewSuperPrefixedTripleRange rg 'func RedelegationsByDelegatorAndValidator' -A 20Length of output: 799
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for the usage of NewSuperPrefixedTripleRange in Go files to verify the impact of the boolean parameter rg 'NewSuperPrefixedTripleRange' --type go -A 5Length of output: 1960
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yml
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (5)
- collections/README.md (2 hunks)
- x/distribution/keeper/hooks.go (1 hunks)
- x/feegrant/keeper/keeper.go (1 hunks)
- x/staking/keeper/delegation.go (3 hunks)
- x/staking/keeper/query_utils.go (1 hunks)
Additional context used
Path-based instructions (5)
x/staking/keeper/query_utils.go (1)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.x/distribution/keeper/hooks.go (1)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.x/feegrant/keeper/keeper.go (1)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.x/staking/keeper/delegation.go (1)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.collections/README.md (1)
Pattern
**/*.md: "Assess the documentation for misspellings, grammatical errors, missing documentation and correctness"
Additional comments not posted (20)
x/staking/keeper/query_utils.go (1)
110-110: Filters are correctly implemented. Suggest renaming the boolean parameter and adding documentation.The implementation of the source and destination validator address filters looks good. The
Walkfunction is correctly updated to respect these filters.Suggestions:
- Consider renaming the boolean parameter passed to
NewPrefixedTripleRangefromfalsetoascendingfor better readability.- Add documentation for the function signature changes, explaining the purpose of the new parameters
srcValAddressanddstValAddress.Also, verify that all callers of this function are updated to pass the new parameters.
Run the following script to find all callers and ensure they are passing the new parameters:
Verification successful
All callers of
GetAllRedelegationshave been updated.The function
GetAllRedelegationsis only called in the test filex/staking/keeper/delegation_test.go, and all calls have been updated to pass the new parameters. No other callers exist in the codebase that require updates.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all callers of `GetAllRedelegations` are passing the new parameters. # Test: Search for calls to `GetAllRedelegations`. Expect: All calls are passing 3 parameters. rg --type go --context 5 $'GetAllRedelegations\('Length of output: 2267
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for all occurrences of `GetAllRedelegations` in the codebase to verify that all callers are updated. # Search for calls to `GetAllRedelegations` across the codebase. rg --type go 'GetAllRedelegations\('Length of output: 333
x/distribution/keeper/hooks.go (1)
113-113: Verify the addition of the boolean parameter inNewPrefixedTripleRange.The change at line 113 involves adding a boolean parameter to the
NewPrefixedTripleRangefunction call. This parameter likely alters the behavior of how ranges are defined for clearing validator slash events. It's crucial to:
- Verify the correctness and necessity of this parameter. Ensure that it aligns with the intended functionality and does not introduce regressions.
- Assess the impact on existing functionality. Check if this change affects other parts of the system that use
NewPrefixedTripleRange.- Review related documentation or comments to ensure they are updated to reflect this change.
Verification successful
The addition of the boolean parameter in
NewPrefixedTripleRangeis correct and consistent.The boolean parameter added to the
NewPrefixedTripleRangefunction call inx/distribution/keeper/hooks.gois consistently used across the codebase. It determines the order of the range (ascending or descending), and its usage is well-documented and tested. There are no indications of regressions or unintended side effects.
- The change aligns with the intended functionality and is supported by test cases in
collections/triple_test.go.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of `NewPrefixedTripleRange` with the new boolean parameter across the codebase. # Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Consistent usage of the new parameter across all calls. rg --type go -A 5 $'NewPrefixedTripleRange'Length of output: 3330
x/feegrant/keeper/keeper.go (1)
297-297: Review the addition of the boolean parameter inNewPrefixUntilTripleRange.The addition of the
falseparameter to theNewPrefixUntilTripleRangefunction call modifies how the range is defined for iterating over the grants. It's important to understand the specific behavior this boolean controls—whether it affects the inclusivity of the range endpoints or the direction of iteration.Given the critical nature of the function in managing fee allowances, I recommend:
- Verifying the behavior of this parameter in different scenarios to ensure it aligns with the intended functionality.
- Adding comments to clarify the role of this parameter for future maintainability.
Verification successful
The boolean parameter in
NewPrefixUntilTripleRangecontrols iteration order.The
falseparameter in theNewPrefixUntilTripleRangefunction call specifies that the range should be iterated in ascending order. This is crucial for the correct operation of theRemoveExpiredAllowancesfunction, ensuring expired allowances are processed in the intended sequence.
- Consider adding comments to clarify the role of this parameter for future maintainability.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the behavior of the boolean parameter in different scenarios. # Test: Search for the function usage and related documentation. Expect: Documentation or comments explaining the parameter's behavior. rg --type go -A 5 $'NewPrefixUntilTripleRange'Length of output: 1135
x/staking/keeper/delegation.go (3)
424-424: Verify the impact of the boolean parameter on data retrieval.The addition of the
falseparameter to theNewPrefixedTripleRangefunction call changes how the range is defined, potentially affecting the data retrieved by this method. Ensure that this change aligns with the intended behavior and does not introduce any unintended side effects.
444-444: Verify the impact of the boolean parameter on data retrieval.The addition of the
falseparameter to theNewPrefixedTripleRangefunction call changes how the range is defined, potentially affecting the data retrieved by this method. Ensure that this change aligns with the intended behavior and does not introduce any unintended side effects.
465-465: Verify the impact of the boolean parameter on data retrieval.The addition of the
falseparameter to theNewSuperPrefixedTripleRangefunction call changes how the range is defined, potentially affecting the data retrieved by this method. Ensure that this change aligns with the intended behavior and does not introduce any unintended side effects.collections/README.md (14)
Line range hint
1-14: Introduction Section: Clear and InformativeThe introductory section provides a clear and concise explanation of the purpose and benefits of the
Collectionslibrary within the Cosmos SDK context.
Line range hint
20-22: Installation Instructions: Correct and StandardThe provided Go get command is the standard method for installing Go modules and is correctly formatted for the
collectionslibrary.
Line range hint
26-34: Core Types Section: Well-DocumentedThe core types section effectively outlines the different APIs available in the
Collectionslibrary, providing a clear understanding of each type's purpose.
Line range hint
36-116: Preliminary Components Section: Detailed and PracticalThis section provides a thorough explanation of the foundational components like
SchemaBuilderandPrefix, enhanced by practical examples and clear descriptions.
Line range hint
118-166: Key and Value Codecs Section: Informative and ClearThe explanations and examples provided in this section effectively demonstrate the role and implementation of key and value codecs within the library.
Line range hint
168-250: Map Section: Comprehensive and PracticalThe
Mapsection is well-documented, providing a comprehensive overview of its capabilities and practical examples that clearly demonstrate how to use this collection type.
Line range hint
252-286: KeySet Section: Clearly ExplainedThe
KeySetsection effectively explains this collection type and provides a practical example, enhancing understanding of its use and implementation.
Line range hint
288-316: Item Section: Well-ExplainedThe
Itemsection provides a clear explanation of the collection type and includes a practical example that demonstrates its use effectively.
Line range hint
318-416: Iteration Section: Detailed and PracticalThis section thoroughly explains the iteration capabilities of different collection types and provides practical examples that demonstrate these capabilities effectively.
Line range hint
418-496: Composite Keys Section: Comprehensive and ClearThe section on composite keys is well-explained, with a detailed example that effectively demonstrates how to implement and use composite keys within the library.
Line range hint
498-576: Indexed Map Section: Thorough and InformativeThe
IndexedMapsection is thoroughly explained, with a detailed example that clearly demonstrates the capabilities and use cases of this collection type.
Line range hint
578-610: Collections with Interfaces as Values Section: Clear and PracticalThis section effectively explains how to handle collections with interface values, providing a practical example that demonstrates the implementation clearly.
Line range hint
612-1178: Triple Key Section: Well-Documented and PracticalThe
Triplekey section provides a clear explanation of this key type and includes practical examples that demonstrate its use effectively.
Line range hint
1180-1208: Advanced Usages Section: Informative and RelevantThe advanced usages section is well-explained, providing a clear understanding of alternative value codecs and their practical applications.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yml
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (5)
- collections/README.md (2 hunks)
- x/distribution/keeper/hooks.go (1 hunks)
- x/feegrant/keeper/keeper.go (1 hunks)
- x/staking/keeper/delegation.go (3 hunks)
- x/staking/keeper/query_utils.go (1 hunks)
Additional context used
Path-based instructions (5)
x/staking/keeper/query_utils.go (1)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.x/distribution/keeper/hooks.go (1)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.x/feegrant/keeper/keeper.go (1)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.x/staking/keeper/delegation.go (1)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.collections/README.md (1)
Pattern
**/*.md: "Assess the documentation for misspellings, grammatical errors, missing documentation and correctness"
Learnings (1)
x/distribution/keeper/hooks.go (1)
Learnt from: atheeshp PR: cosmos/cosmos-sdk#18236 File: x/slashing/keeper/hooks.go:104-113 Timestamp: 2023-11-21T11:45:40.885Z Learning: The `AfterConsensusPubKeyUpdate` function in `x/slashing/keeper/hooks.go` is part of an interface and requires a parameter for coins, as clarified by the user atheeshp. This parameter is to be kept even if it's not currently used within the function, to maintain interface consistency and support future use cases.
Additional comments not posted (6)
x/staking/keeper/query_utils.go (1)
110-110: Review the use of the newcollections.NewPrefixedTripleRangefunction.The introduction of the
falseparameter in theNewPrefixedTripleRangefunction call at line 110 is a significant change. This parameter likely controls the direction of the range query, aligning with the PR's objective to support reverse iteration. However, it's crucial to verify that this change does not affect other functionalities of theGetAllRedelegationsfunction, especially the filtering logic based on source and destination validator addresses.Ensure that the new parameter is correctly implemented and thoroughly tested to confirm that it behaves as expected without unintended side effects.
Verification successful
Verification successful: The use of
collections.NewPrefixedTripleRangewith thefalseparameter is consistent and correct.The change to use
collections.NewPrefixedTripleRangewith thefalseparameter in theGetAllRedelegationsfunction aligns with the intended behavior of ascending order iteration. This is consistent with its usage across the codebase and is supported by existing test cases. There are no indications of unintended side effects on the function's filtering logic.
- The
NewPrefixedTripleRangefunction is well-documented and tested for both ascending and descending orders.- The change maintains consistency with other parts of the codebase using the same parameter.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the behavior of the new parameter in the `NewPrefixedTripleRange` function. # Test: Search for the function usage and its impact on the behavior of the `GetAllRedelegations` function. rg --type go -A 5 $'NewPrefixedTripleRange'Length of output: 3330
x/distribution/keeper/hooks.go (1)
113-113: LGTM!The code change is approved. Adding the
falseargument toNewPrefixedTripleRangeconstructor likely affects how the range is defined or how slashing events are cleared based on the new parameter.x/feegrant/keeper/keeper.go (2)
297-297: Clarify the purpose and impact of the additional parameter inNewPrefixUntilTripleRange.The instantiation of the
rngvariable now includes an additional boolean parameterfalsein theNewPrefixUntilTripleRangefunction call. This change likely alters the behavior of the range created for iterating over expired grants.Please provide clarification on the purpose and impact of this additional parameter. Consider adding a comment to explain the parameter's significance and how it affects the identification and processing of expired grants.
Line range hint
1-323: Rest of the code looks good!The other parts of the file appear to be in order and adhere to the Uber Go Style Guide. No deviations or issues were found.
collections/README.md (2)
1169-1169: Verify the impact of the boolean parameter on iteration behavior.The addition of a boolean parameter to the
NewPrefixedTripleRangefunction, as indicated by the AI-generated summary, suggests a change in how ranges are created and potentially how iteration is handled. It's crucial to ensure that this change does not adversely affect existing functionality or expected behavior in iteration processes.Verification successful
The boolean parameter in
NewPrefixedTripleRangeis well-tested and does not adversely affect iteration behavior.The
NewPrefixedTripleRangefunction's boolean parameter is used to control the order of iteration, and its impact is verified through test cases that cover both ascending and descending orders. This ensures that the function behaves as expected without affecting existing functionality.
- The function is defined in
collections/triple.goand used in various parts of the codebase.- Test cases in
collections/triple_test.goconfirm the correct behavior for bothfalseandtruevalues of the parameter.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the impact of the boolean parameter on iteration behavior. # Test: Search for the usage of `NewPrefixedTripleRange` in the codebase. Expect: Only occurrences with the new boolean parameter. rg --type go -A 5 $'NewPrefixedTripleRange'Length of output: 3330
1178-1178: Assess the addition of the boolean parameter inNewSuperPrefixedTripleRange.Similar to the previous function, the introduction of a boolean parameter in
NewSuperPrefixedTripleRangemay influence the behavior of range creation and iteration. This change needs careful evaluation to ensure it aligns with the intended functionality and does not introduce regressions or unexpected behaviors.Verification successful
Boolean Parameter in
NewSuperPrefixedTripleRangeis Well-IntegratedThe addition of the boolean parameter in
NewSuperPrefixedTripleRangeis used to control the order of iteration, and its integration appears to be intentional and well-tested. The function's behavior with both true and false values is verified in the test cases, ensuring that it aligns with the intended functionality without introducing regressions.
- The function is defined in
collections/triple.goand used inx/staking/keeper/delegation.go.- Test cases in
collections/triple_test.goconfirm the functionality for both parameter values.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Assess the addition of the boolean parameter in `NewSuperPrefixedTripleRange`. # Test: Search for the usage of `NewSuperPrefixedTripleRange` in the codebase. Expect: Only occurrences with the new boolean parameter. rg --type go -A 5 $'NewSuperPrefixedTripleRange'Length of output: 1960
|
Also, not sure how to fix the failed "Changelog Reminder" check. @julienrbrt can you explain? |
Don't worry about it, it is fine, it breaks with external contributors. |
julienrbrt
requested review from
testinginprod
and removed request for
JulianToledano
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yml
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (2)
- collections/triple.go (1 hunks)
- collections/triple_test.go (2 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- collections/triple_test.go
Additional context used
Path-based instructions (1)
collections/triple.go (1)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.
Additional comments not posted (3)
collections/triple.go (3)
308-314: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
318-325: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
329-336: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
collections/triple.go (2)
342-352: LGTM! Consider enhancing the documentation.The implementation of
NewPrefixUntilTripleRangeReversedlooks good. It correctly adds reverse order iteration functionality.Consider adding a brief example in the function's documentation to illustrate its usage, which could help developers understand how to utilize this new feature effectively.
342-374: Summary: Reverse iteration support for Triple keysThe additions of
NewPrefixUntilTripleRangeReversed,NewPrefixedTripleRangeReversed, andNewSuperPrefixedTripleRangeReversedfunctions successfully implement reverse order iteration for Triple keys. These changes enhance the flexibility of the Triple collection, allowing for more diverse use cases in data traversal.The implementations are consistent with the existing codebase and correctly utilize the
OrderDescendingoption. However, please ensure that the documentation errors in the function comments are addressed as mentioned in the previous review comments.Consider adding unit tests to verify the correct behavior of these new reverse iteration functions, especially edge cases and their interaction with existing forward iteration methods.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
- collections/triple.go (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
collections/triple.go (1)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
- collections/indexes/multi.go (2 hunks)
- collections/triple.go (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (2)
collections/indexes/multi.go (1)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.collections/triple.go (1)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.
🔇 Additional comments (4)
collections/triple.go (4)
342-352: LGTM: NewPrefixUntilTripleRangeReversed implementationThe implementation of
NewPrefixUntilTripleRangeReversedis correct and consistent with its non-reversed counterpart. The addition oforder: OrderDescendingachieves the desired reverse order functionality. The unstable API comment is appropriate for this new feature.
354-363: LGTM: NewPrefixedTripleRangeReversed implementationThe implementation of
NewPrefixedTripleRangeReversedis correct and consistent with its non-reversed counterpart. The addition oforder: OrderDescendingachieves the desired reverse order functionality. The function name and comment accurately describe its purpose.
365-374: LGTM: NewSuperPrefixedTripleRangeReversed implementationThe implementation of
NewSuperPrefixedTripleRangeReversedis correct and consistent with its non-reversed counterpart. The addition oforder: OrderDescendingachieves the desired reverse order functionality. The function name and comment accurately describe its purpose.
342-374: Summary: Reverse order range functions for Triple keysThe additions of
NewPrefixUntilTripleRangeReversed,NewPrefixedTripleRangeReversed, andNewSuperPrefixedTripleRangeReversedsuccessfully implement support for reverse iterators in the Triple collection. These new functions are consistent with their non-reversed counterparts and follow the existing patterns in the file. The changes align well with the PR objectives and enhance the functionality of the Triple collection without introducing breaking changes.
collections/indexes/multi.go
Outdated
| if unique { | ||
| // compare the byte representation of ref keys | ||
| refKey := key.K1() | ||
| unsafeRefKey := *(*[]byte)(unsafe.Pointer(&refKey)) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
this will not work on keys different from string/bytes
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I am now converting the Multi key codec to be a pairKeyCodec so I can directly get the reference key codec and use it to encode to bytes (instead of using the unsafe package).
It must work since the Multi KeyCodec is a key codec of a Pair: ReferenceKey and PrimaryKey. I manually tried my new implementation with uint64 ref keys and it worked.
collections/indexes/multi.go
Outdated
| unsafeRefKey := *(*[]byte)(unsafe.Pointer(&refKey)) | ||
|
|
||
| // use SHA256 hash as map keys | ||
| if _, ok := visited[sha256.Sum256(unsafeRefKey)]; ok { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
we should not hash, at best (or worst) we should use just string(x)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I am now using string() instead of hash. see oren-lava@551ed34
@testinginprod
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
collections/indexes/multi.go (1)
124-128: Consider enhancing the method documentationThe warning about gas costs is crucial information. Consider expanding on this to provide more specific guidance to users.
You could add:
- An estimate of what constitutes a "small set" of reference keys.
- Suggestions for alternative approaches when dealing with large sets.
- A note on the time complexity of the operation.
This additional information would help developers make informed decisions about using this method.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
- collections/indexes/multi.go (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
collections/indexes/multi.go (1)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.
🔇 Additional comments (3)
collections/indexes/multi.go (3)
136-141: LGTM: Proper iteration and error handlingThe iteration over keys and error handling for
iter.Key()are implemented correctly. Good job on ensuring robust error handling throughout the loop.
160-164: LGTM: Proper key collection and returnThe final part of the method, including the collection of keys and the return statement, is implemented correctly.
124-164: Overall assessment: Well-implemented with room for optimizationThe
RefKeysmethod is generally well-implemented and follows Go best practices. It correctly handles the retrieval of reference keys with an option for uniqueness. The error handling is robust, and the logic is sound.However, there are opportunities for optimization, especially when dealing with large sets of keys:
- Pre-allocating the slice and map
- Reusing the buffer for key encoding
These optimizations could potentially improve performance and reduce memory allocations.
Consider implementing these optimizations and conducting benchmarks to measure the performance impact, especially for large sets of keys.
To verify the performance impact of the suggested optimizations, you could run the following benchmark:
This will help quantify the performance improvements and ensure that the optimizations are effective.
|
I see that @octavio12345300 approved my changes, can the PR be merged? @julienrbrt @testinginprod |
|
@octavio12345300 is a bot, let me review it right now. I'll ping someone else for review as well. |
Hey there, did you have a chance to review it? @julienrbrt |
| // of [ReferenceKey, PrimaryKey] | ||
| refKeyCodec := m.refKeys.KeyCodec().(pairKeyCodec[ReferenceKey, PrimaryKey]).KeyCodec1() | ||
| buf := make([]byte, refKeyCodec.Size(refKey)) | ||
| _, err := refKeyCodec.Encode(buf, refKey) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
we should avoid re-encoding the values since the iterator already holds a reference to the bytes key.
Ok, opened a new PR only with the ReverseTriple helpers here: #22641 |
Let's close this one yeah. |
Description
Closes: #21091
Added the
RefKeys()method for theMultitype to get a full list of the existing reference keys (with option for unique list). Also, added missing support of reverse iterator for aTriplecollection (always usedorder=OrderAscendingwithout option to edit).Author Checklist
All items are required. Please add a note to the item if the item is not applicable and
please add links to any relevant follow up issues.
I have...
!in the type prefix if API or client breaking changeCHANGELOG.mdReviewers Checklist
All items are required. Please add a note if the item is not applicable and please add
your handle next to the items reviewed if you only reviewed selected items.
Please see Pull Request Reviewer section in the contributing guide for more information on how to review a pull request.
I have...
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Triplekeys, allowing for more flexible data retrieval.Bug Fixes