Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

refactor(simdv2): allow non-comet server components (backport #22351) #22353

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 24, 2024

Conversation

mergify[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@mergify mergify bot commented Oct 24, 2024

This renames NewRootCmd to NewCometBFTRootCmd, to make it clear that it uses CometBFT for the consensus layer. Callers who want to use a different consensus-providing server component can instead call NewRootCmdWithConsensusComponent, passing in a callback to be evaluated with a client context in order to produce the component.

This pattern is working for Gordian-Cosmos integration.

I'm not especially tied to the new function names. I'm also open to more clear naming for "consensus component" which occurs a few times.

/cc @kocubinski as this may overlap or conflict with #22267.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Introduced a new command structure with the NewCometBFTRootCmd function for improved consensus component integration.
    • Added NewRootCmdWithConsensusComponent function for flexible command creation.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Updated command initialization across multiple components to ensure consistent behavior with the new consensus structure.
  • Tests

    • Modified test cases to utilize the new command structure, ensuring compatibility with recent changes.

This is an automatic backport of pull request #22351 done by [Mergify](https://mergify.com).

@mergify mergify bot requested a review from a team as a code owner October 24, 2024 08:39
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 24, 2024

Important

Review skipped

Bot user detected.

To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.


🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@julienrbrt julienrbrt merged commit c296622 into release/v0.52.x Oct 24, 2024
65 of 70 checks passed
@julienrbrt julienrbrt deleted the mergify/bp/release/v0.52.x/pr-22351 branch October 24, 2024 08:40
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants