Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix simulation bugs; Incorprates #2676 from Sunny #2677
Fix simulation bugs; Incorprates #2676 from Sunny #2677
Changes from all commits
4e44ddf
38ceea1
4e48217
46e6b40
3884b13
991573e
f5918db
e2aa3e9
01c235d
f13f602
1868ee3
a84cf4f
fb0f4a4
d9907cc
f695a66
39165c9
3cf6687
42eb4e2
888c061
13d933f
191a732
559ebb7
7b10ac4
4068d8a
ace50be
95cf0c3
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Shouldn't we change all passed around Keepers to be pointers? Or just save that for a seperate PR?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Lets consider it in the future for a separate PR... I'm not sure. I think for new keepers we do want pointers.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Related to #2663?
Like maybe these sanity check so be run as an optional thing?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It's not super performance heavy, lets run it always for now.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hmm - if
MaxEvidenceAge
is equal to the unbonding period, shouldn't this case be impossible? Is this an off-by-one problem due to the next val set offset? If so can we add a comment about it?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
++
I would replace
// defensive
with the actual comment describing what it's being defensive of.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Simulation doesn't take this into account, and Tendermint might break this assumption at some point.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
👍