-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.6k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
WIP: Fix ICS23-Proofs #6178
Closed
Closed
WIP: Fix ICS23-Proofs #6178
Changes from 6 commits
Commits
Show all changes
9 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
73462b2
integrate @ethanfrey work on confio/ics23 into 23-commitment
AdityaSripal 59d5fd1
start potential chain-proof implementation
AdityaSripal 567fc51
Update x/ibc/07-tendermint/types/client_state.go
AdityaSripal 2da7b0d
Update x/ibc/07-tendermint/types/msgs.go
AdityaSripal 4c38f3e
add GetProofSpecs method to localhost clientstate
AdityaSripal dba44d8
Merge branch 'aditya/ics23-proofs' of github.com:cosmos/cosmos-sdk in…
AdityaSripal d26a2d8
move specs out of proofs
AdityaSripal f605880
implement batch proofs
AdityaSripal 6c66834
replace MultiStoreProofOp with SimpleValueOp
AdityaSripal File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
As @ethanfrey mentioned, the proof spec needs to be fixed by the client not passed in by the user. I can either inject the clientstate proofspecs into the
MerkleProof
struct (replacing whatever user passed in). Or i can remove specs fromMerkleProof
and pass it into theVerifyMembership function
.The latter requires a change in ICS spec
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We should change ICS 23 to not put
ProofSpec
in the proofsIf this requires a spec change as well, we can do that