Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

x/ibc/24-host: fix some comments and dedup a function #7923

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Nov 13, 2020

Conversation

ebuchman
Copy link
Member

Description

Minor fixes to some comments. Also adds a suggested code dedup from https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/issues/7922#issuecomment-726396387


Before we can merge this PR, please make sure that all the following items have been
checked off. If any of the checklist items are not applicable, please leave them but
write a little note why.

  • Targeted PR against correct branch (see CONTRIBUTING.md)
  • Linked to Github issue with discussion and accepted design OR link to spec that describes this work.
  • Code follows the module structure standards.
  • Wrote unit and integration tests
  • Updated relevant documentation (docs/) or specification (x/<module>/spec/)
  • Added relevant godoc comments.
  • Added a relevant changelog entry to the Unreleased section in CHANGELOG.md
  • Re-reviewed Files changed in the Github PR explorer
  • Review Codecov Report in the comment section below once CI passes

@ebuchman ebuchman changed the title x/ibc/24-host: fix some comments x/ibc/24-host: fix some comments and dedup a function Nov 12, 2020
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 12, 2020

Codecov Report

Merging #7923 (cc9c701) into master (6f5eaba) will decrease coverage by 0.00%.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #7923      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   54.15%   54.15%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         612      612              
  Lines       38985    38980       -5     
==========================================
- Hits        21114    21109       -5     
  Misses      15701    15701              
  Partials     2170     2170              

Copy link
Collaborator

@fedekunze fedekunze left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@fedekunze fedekunze added x/ibc A:automerge Automatically merge PR once all prerequisites pass. and removed x/ibc labels Nov 13, 2020
Copy link
Contributor

@cwgoes cwgoes left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ACK

Copy link
Contributor

@colin-axner colin-axner left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ACK

// PathValidator takes in path string and validates with default identifier rules:
// path consists of `/`-separated valid identifiers,
// each identifier is between 1-64 characters and contains only alphanumeric and some allowed
// special characters (see IsValidID).
func PathValidator(path string) error {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@fedekunze why do we have this function?

It seems to be only used in connection genesis validating ConnectionPaths but from what I can tell, a connection path is simply all the connection ids attached to a client id. Instead we should be calling connection id validation. I don't think there are any / in a connection path as we currently use them

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I can open a followup fixing this, here is where we use ConnectionPaths

@mergify mergify bot merged commit 15103b6 into master Nov 13, 2020
@mergify mergify bot deleted the bucky/24-host-comments branch November 13, 2020 10:33
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
A:automerge Automatically merge PR once all prerequisites pass.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants