Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: check store keys length before accessing #9639

Merged
merged 18 commits into from
Jul 8, 2021

Conversation

likhita-809
Copy link
Contributor

Description

Closes: #8451


Author Checklist

All items are required. Please add a note to the item if the item is not applicable and
please add links to any relevant follow up issues.

I have...

  • included the correct type prefix in the PR title
  • added ! to the type prefix if API or client breaking change
  • targeted the correct branch (see PR Targeting)
  • provided a link to the relevant issue or specification
  • followed the guidelines for building modules
  • included the necessary unit and integration tests
  • added a changelog entry to CHANGELOG.md
  • included comments for documenting Go code
  • updated the relevant documentation or specification
  • reviewed "Files changed" and left comments if necessary
  • confirmed all CI checks have passed

Reviewers Checklist

All items are required. Please add a note if the item is not applicable and please add
your handle next to the items reviewed if you only reviewed selected items.

I have...

  • confirmed the correct type prefix in the PR title
  • confirmed ! in the type prefix if API or client breaking change
  • confirmed all author checklist items have been addressed
  • reviewed state machine logic
  • reviewed API design and naming
  • reviewed documentation is accurate
  • reviewed tests and test coverage
  • manually tested (if applicable)

@github-actions github-actions bot added C:x/authz C:x/distribution distribution module related C:x/gov labels Jul 6, 2021
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jul 6, 2021

Codecov Report

Merging #9639 (8b6e32e) into master (0027111) will increase coverage by 27.93%.
The diff coverage is 63.61%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #9639       +/-   ##
===========================================
+ Coverage   35.48%   63.41%   +27.93%     
===========================================
  Files         332      571      +239     
  Lines       32620    37542     +4922     
===========================================
+ Hits        11575    23808    +12233     
+ Misses      19819    11876     -7943     
- Partials     1226     1858      +632     
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
client/keys/types.go 100.00% <ø> (+100.00%) ⬆️
client/query.go 16.98% <ø> (ø)
client/rpc/block.go 0.00% <ø> (ø)
client/rpc/status.go 67.74% <ø> (ø)
client/rpc/validators.go 0.00% <ø> (ø)
client/test_helpers.go 0.00% <ø> (ø)
client/tx/factory.go 27.00% <ø> (ø)
client/tx/legacy.go 68.42% <ø> (ø)
client/tx/tx.go 40.83% <ø> (ø)
client/utils.go 41.93% <ø> (-41.40%) ⬇️
... and 681 more

Copy link
Contributor

@amaury1093 amaury1093 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

First couple of comments

x/authz/keeper/keys.go Show resolved Hide resolved
x/distribution/types/keys.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
CHANGELOG.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Contributor

@ruhatch ruhatch left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yeah, all the numbers seem to add up! Just a couple of small nits, but pre-approving.

CHANGELOG.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
types/kv/helpers.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Contributor

@ruhatch ruhatch left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM!

@amaury1093 amaury1093 requested a review from odeke-em July 8, 2021 08:55
Copy link
Contributor

@amaury1093 amaury1093 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

also checked that the lengths add up.

I didn't check whether or not we added kv.Assert* everywhere where key slices are accessed.

types/kv/helpers.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@likhita-809
Copy link
Contributor Author

I didn't check whether or not we added kv.Assert* everywhere where key slices are accessed.
I cross-checked this in every module

Copy link
Contributor

@amaury1093 amaury1093 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

last small nit

types/kv/helpers.go Show resolved Hide resolved
@amaury1093
Copy link
Contributor

With Ru's approval, we got 2, so I'm merging. Thanks @likhita-809 !

@amaury1093 amaury1093 merged commit d13d488 into master Jul 8, 2021
@amaury1093 amaury1093 deleted the likhita/check-store-keys-length branch July 8, 2021 11:29
julienrbrt pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 6, 2022
* check store keys length before accessing

* check store keys length in all modules

* add changelog

* refactoring

* address review comments

* remove commented lines

* small fixes

* address review comments

* fix failing tests

* add godocs
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Check store keys length before accessing them
4 participants