Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: add migrations for balances with zero coins (backport #9664) #9687

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jul 13, 2021

Conversation

mergify[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@mergify mergify bot commented Jul 13, 2021

This is an automatic backport of pull request #9664 done by Mergify.
Cherry-pick of d56c8cd has failed:

On branch mergify/bp/release/v0.43.x/pr-9664
Your branch is up to date with 'origin/release/v0.43.x'.

You are currently cherry-picking commit d56c8cdbc.
  (fix conflicts and run "git cherry-pick --continue")
  (use "git cherry-pick --skip" to skip this patch)
  (use "git cherry-pick --abort" to cancel the cherry-pick operation)

Changes to be committed:
	modified:   x/bank/legacy/v043/store.go
	modified:   x/genutil/legacy/v043/migrate.go

Unmerged paths:
  (use "git add <file>..." to mark resolution)
	added by them:   x/bank/legacy/v043/json.go
	added by them:   x/bank/legacy/v043/json_test.go
	added by them:   x/bank/legacy/v043/keys.go
	both modified:   x/bank/legacy/v043/store_test.go

To fix up this pull request, you can check it out locally. See documentation: https://docs.github.com/en/github/collaborating-with-pull-requests/reviewing-changes-in-pull-requests/checking-out-pull-requests-locally


Mergify commands and options

More conditions and actions can be found in the documentation.

You can also trigger Mergify actions by commenting on this pull request:

  • @Mergifyio refresh will re-evaluate the rules
  • @Mergifyio rebase will rebase this PR on its base branch
  • @Mergifyio update will merge the base branch into this PR
  • @Mergifyio backport <destination> will backport this PR on <destination> branch

Additionally, on Mergify dashboard you can:

  • look at your merge queues
  • generate the Mergify configuration with the config editor.

Finally, you can contact us on https://mergify.io/

<!--
The default pull request template is for types feat, fix, or refactor.
For other templates, add one of the following parameters to the url:
- template=docs.md
- template=other.md
-->

## Description

Closes: #9653

<!-- Add a description of the changes that this PR introduces and the files that
are the most critical to review. -->

---

### Author Checklist

*All items are required. Please add a note to the item if the item is not applicable and
please add links to any relevant follow up issues.*

I have...

- [ ] included the correct [type prefix](https://github.com/commitizen/conventional-commit-types/blob/v3.0.0/index.json) in the PR title
- [ ] added `!` to the type prefix if API or client breaking change
- [ ] targeted the correct branch (see [PR Targeting](https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#pr-targeting))
- [ ] provided a link to the relevant issue or specification
- [ ] followed the guidelines for [building modules](https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/blob/master/docs/building-modules)
- [ ] included the necessary unit and integration [tests](https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#testing)
- [ ] added a changelog entry to `CHANGELOG.md`
- [ ] included comments for [documenting Go code](https://blog.golang.org/godoc)
- [ ] updated the relevant documentation or specification
- [ ] reviewed "Files changed" and left comments if necessary
- [ ] confirmed all CI checks have passed

### Reviewers Checklist

*All items are required. Please add a note if the item is not applicable and please add
your handle next to the items reviewed if you only reviewed selected items.*

I have...

- [ ] confirmed the correct [type prefix](https://github.com/commitizen/conventional-commit-types/blob/v3.0.0/index.json) in the PR title
- [ ] confirmed `!` in the type prefix if API or client breaking change
- [ ] confirmed all author checklist items have been addressed
- [ ] reviewed state machine logic
- [ ] reviewed API design and naming
- [ ] reviewed documentation is accurate
- [ ] reviewed tests and test coverage
- [ ] manually tested (if applicable)

(cherry picked from commit d56c8cd)

# Conflicts:
#	x/bank/legacy/v043/json.go
#	x/bank/legacy/v043/json_test.go
#	x/bank/legacy/v043/keys.go
#	x/bank/legacy/v043/store_test.go
@mergify mergify bot added the conflicts label Jul 13, 2021
@github-actions github-actions bot added C:x/bank C:x/genutil genutil module issues labels Jul 13, 2021
@amaury1093
Copy link
Contributor

@atheeshp Could you fix the conflicts here? Thanks

@orijbot
Copy link

orijbot commented Jul 13, 2021

Visit https://dashboard.github.orijtech.com?pr=9687&repo=cosmos%2Fcosmos-sdk to see benchmark details.

@atheeshp atheeshp requested a review from amaury1093 July 13, 2021 14:26
Copy link
Contributor

@amaury1093 amaury1093 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

tACK. I tested only the store migration, works great 👍

@amaury1093 amaury1093 merged commit 56c1650 into release/v0.43.x Jul 13, 2021
@amaury1093 amaury1093 deleted the mergify/bp/release/v0.43.x/pr-9664 branch July 13, 2021 15:56
JeancarloBarrios pushed a commit to agoric-labs/cosmos-sdk that referenced this pull request Sep 28, 2024
…) (cosmos#9687)

* feat: add migrations for balances with zero coins (cosmos#9664)

<!--
The default pull request template is for types feat, fix, or refactor.
For other templates, add one of the following parameters to the url:
- template=docs.md
- template=other.md
-->

## Description

Closes: cosmos#9653

<!-- Add a description of the changes that this PR introduces and the files that
are the most critical to review. -->

---

### Author Checklist

*All items are required. Please add a note to the item if the item is not applicable and
please add links to any relevant follow up issues.*

I have...

- [ ] included the correct [type prefix](https://github.com/commitizen/conventional-commit-types/blob/v3.0.0/index.json) in the PR title
- [ ] added `!` to the type prefix if API or client breaking change
- [ ] targeted the correct branch (see [PR Targeting](https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#pr-targeting))
- [ ] provided a link to the relevant issue or specification
- [ ] followed the guidelines for [building modules](https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/blob/master/docs/building-modules)
- [ ] included the necessary unit and integration [tests](https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#testing)
- [ ] added a changelog entry to `CHANGELOG.md`
- [ ] included comments for [documenting Go code](https://blog.golang.org/godoc)
- [ ] updated the relevant documentation or specification
- [ ] reviewed "Files changed" and left comments if necessary
- [ ] confirmed all CI checks have passed

### Reviewers Checklist

*All items are required. Please add a note if the item is not applicable and please add
your handle next to the items reviewed if you only reviewed selected items.*

I have...

- [ ] confirmed the correct [type prefix](https://github.com/commitizen/conventional-commit-types/blob/v3.0.0/index.json) in the PR title
- [ ] confirmed `!` in the type prefix if API or client breaking change
- [ ] confirmed all author checklist items have been addressed
- [ ] reviewed state machine logic
- [ ] reviewed API design and naming
- [ ] reviewed documentation is accurate
- [ ] reviewed tests and test coverage
- [ ] manually tested (if applicable)

(cherry picked from commit d56c8cd)

# Conflicts:
#	x/bank/legacy/v043/json.go
#	x/bank/legacy/v043/json_test.go
#	x/bank/legacy/v043/keys.go
#	x/bank/legacy/v043/store_test.go

* fix conflicts

* fix tests

Co-authored-by: atheeshp <59333759+atheeshp@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: atheesh <atheesh@vitwit.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
C:x/bank C:x/genutil genutil module issues
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants