use controller module address instead of module name for NewMsgChannelOpenInit (backport #2568) #2608
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
![mergify[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/10562?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
…lOpenInit (#2568) ## Description In controller keeper's `registerInterchainAccount` we execute a `MsgChannelOpenInit` to set up an ica channel. Currently, we have [`icatypes.ModuleName`](https://github.com/cosmos/ibc-go/blob/95cec44c9fb10a2e84a327cdd98c7d588f091f42/modules/apps/27-interchain-accounts/controller/keeper/account.go#L63) as the msg signer. This is not good because the [`ValidateBasic()`](https://github.com/cosmos/ibc-go/blob/692790402a033c1d9647c1e1eded5351332283bf/modules/core/04-channel/types/msgs.go#L34) of `MsgChannelOpenInit` has check if msg signer is bech32 or not. ref #2566 closes: #2559 --- Before we can merge this PR, please make sure that all the following items have been checked off. If any of the checklist items are not applicable, please leave them but write a little note why. - [ ] Targeted PR against correct branch (see [CONTRIBUTING.md](https://github.com/cosmos/ibc-go/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#pr-targeting)) - [ ] Linked to Github issue with discussion and accepted design OR link to spec that describes this work. - [ ] Code follows the [module structure standards](https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/blob/main/docs/docs/building-modules/10-structure.md). - [ ] Wrote unit and integration [tests](https://github.com/cosmos/ibc-go/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#testing) - [ ] Updated relevant documentation (`docs/`) or specification (`x/<module>/spec/`) - [ ] Added relevant `godoc` [comments](https://blog.golang.org/godoc-documenting-go-code). - [ ] Added a relevant changelog entry to the `Unreleased` section in `CHANGELOG.md` - [ ] Re-reviewed `Files changed` in the Github PR explorer - [ ] Review `Codecov Report` in the comment section below once CI passes (cherry picked from commit 6105db4) # Conflicts: # modules/apps/27-interchain-accounts/controller/keeper/account.go
mergify
bot
requested review from
seantking,
colin-axner,
AdityaSripal and
damiannolan
as code owners
|
This pull request introduces 1 alert when merging 771c7c5 into bdec253 - view on LGTM.com new alerts:
|
faddat
suggested changes
Oct 27, 2022
colin-axner
approved these changes
Oct 27, 2022
What's your reasoning? I prefer not combining changes unless necessary |
|
these backports seem to work, so there's no need :) |
damiannolan
approved these changes
Oct 27, 2022
dudong2
pushed a commit
to dudong2/ibc-go
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 19, 2023
…lOpenInit (backport cosmos#2568) (cosmos#2608) * use controller module address instead of module name for NewMsgChannelOpenInit (cosmos#2568) In controller keeper's `registerInterchainAccount` we execute a `MsgChannelOpenInit` to set up an ica channel. Currently, we have [`icatypes.ModuleName`](https://github.com/cosmos/ibc-go/blob/95cec44c9fb10a2e84a327cdd98c7d588f091f42/modules/apps/27-interchain-accounts/controller/keeper/account.go#L63) as the msg signer. This is not good because the [`ValidateBasic()`](https://github.com/cosmos/ibc-go/blob/692790402a033c1d9647c1e1eded5351332283bf/modules/core/04-channel/types/msgs.go#L34) of `MsgChannelOpenInit` has check if msg signer is bech32 or not. ref cosmos#2566 closes: cosmos#2559 --- Before we can merge this PR, please make sure that all the following items have been checked off. If any of the checklist items are not applicable, please leave them but write a little note why. - [ ] Targeted PR against correct branch (see [CONTRIBUTING.md](https://github.com/cosmos/ibc-go/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#pr-targeting)) - [ ] Linked to Github issue with discussion and accepted design OR link to spec that describes this work. - [ ] Code follows the [module structure standards](https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/blob/main/docs/docs/building-modules/10-structure.md). - [ ] Wrote unit and integration [tests](https://github.com/cosmos/ibc-go/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#testing) - [ ] Updated relevant documentation (`docs/`) or specification (`x/<module>/spec/`) - [ ] Added relevant `godoc` [comments](https://blog.golang.org/godoc-documenting-go-code). - [ ] Added a relevant changelog entry to the `Unreleased` section in `CHANGELOG.md` - [ ] Re-reviewed `Files changed` in the Github PR explorer - [ ] Review `Codecov Report` in the comment section below once CI passes (cherry picked from commit 6105db4) * resolving conflicts Co-authored-by: khanh-notional <50263489+catShaark@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Damian Nolan <damiannolan@gmail.com>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This is an automatic backport of pull request #2568 done by Mergify.
Cherry-pick of 6105db4 has failed:
To fix up this pull request, you can check it out locally. See documentation: https://docs.github.com/en/github/collaborating-with-pull-requests/reviewing-changes-in-pull-requests/checking-out-pull-requests-locally
Mergify commands and options
More conditions and actions can be found in the documentation.
You can also trigger Mergify actions by commenting on this pull request:
@Mergifyio refreshwill re-evaluate the rules@Mergifyio rebasewill rebase this PR on its base branch@Mergifyio updatewill merge the base branch into this PR@Mergifyio backport <destination>will backport this PR on<destination>branchAdditionally, on Mergify dashboard you can:
Finally, you can contact us on https://mergify.com