Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add git cliff toml to support generation of changelog #2697

Merged
merged 19 commits into from
Nov 15, 2022
Merged
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
35 changes: 29 additions & 6 deletions .github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -12,18 +12,41 @@ are the most critical to review.

closes: #XXXX


### Commit Message / Changelog Entry

```bash
type: commit message
```

see the [guidelines](../CONTRIBUTING.md#commit-messages) for commit messages. (view raw markdown for examples)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Maybe move this into the comment section?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

this was intended to be short version with a prompt to look at the raw markdown (it might not be obvious if you don't know where to look).

Do you think it's not necessary to indicate that there is more details in comments?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I was just thinking this would show on every pr description, but it is only relevant to the pr opener and thus it might make sense to make it a comment in the description so it isn't viewable by the reviewers. But I have no preference, we can always change it later

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think it might provide some value, but like you said we can always remove it in the future if it just ends up being perceived as bloat!



<!--
Example commit messages:

fix: skip emission of unpopulated memo field in ics20
deps: updating sdk to v0.46.4
chore: removed unused variables
e2e: adding e2e upgrade test for ibc-go/v6
docs: ics27 v6 documentation updates
feat: add semantic version utilities for e2e tests
feat(api)!: this is an api breaking feature
fix(statemachine)!: this is a statemachine breaking fix
-->

---

Before we can merge this PR, please make sure that all the following items have been
checked off. If any of the checklist items are not applicable, please leave them but
write a little note why.

- [ ] Targeted PR against correct branch (see [CONTRIBUTING.md](https://github.com/cosmos/ibc-go/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#pr-targeting))
- [ ] Targeted PR against correct branch (see [CONTRIBUTING.md](https://github.com/cosmos/ibc-go/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#pr-targeting)).
- [ ] Linked to Github issue with discussion and accepted design OR link to spec that describes this work.
- [ ] Code follows the [module structure standards](https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/blob/main/docs/docs/building-modules/10-structure.md).
- [ ] Wrote unit and integration [tests](https://github.com/cosmos/ibc-go/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#testing)
- [ ] Updated relevant documentation (`docs/`) or specification (`x/<module>/spec/`)
- [ ] Wrote unit and integration [tests](https://github.com/cosmos/ibc-go/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#testing).
- [ ] Updated relevant documentation (`docs/`) or specification (`x/<module>/spec/`).
- [ ] Added relevant `godoc` [comments](https://blog.golang.org/godoc-documenting-go-code).
- [ ] Added a relevant changelog entry to the `Unreleased` section in `CHANGELOG.md`
- [ ] Re-reviewed `Files changed` in the Github PR explorer
- [ ] Review `Codecov Report` in the comment section below once CI passes
- [ ] Provide a [commit message](../CONTRIBUTING.md#commit-messages) to be used for the changelog entry in the PR description for review.
- [ ] Re-reviewed `Files changed` in the Github PR explorer.
- [ ] Review `Codecov Report` in the comment section below once CI passes.
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion CHANGELOG.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -28,7 +28,7 @@ Types of changes (Stanzas):
"Bug Fixes" for any bug fixes.
"Client Breaking" for breaking CLI commands and REST routes used by end-users.
"API Breaking" for breaking exported APIs used by developers building on SDK.
"State Machine Breaking" for any changes that result in a different AppState given same genesisState and txList.
"State Machine Breaking" for any changes that result in a different AppState given the same genesisState and txList.
Ref: https://keepachangelog.com/en/1.0.0/
-->

Expand Down
23 changes: 23 additions & 0 deletions CONTRIBUTING.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -85,6 +85,29 @@ All PRs require an approval from at least one CODEOWNER before merge. PRs which
- If you sat down with the PR submitter and did a pairing review please note that in the `Approval`, or your PR comments.
- If you are only making "surface level" reviews, submit any notes as `Comments` without adding a review.

### Commit Messages
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Note to myself: add this to the PRs refactoring contributing.md.


Commit messages should be [conventional](https://www.conventionalcommits.org/en/v1.0.0/).
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Do all the commits in the PR need to follow this convention or the one that matters is the commit message that is entered when squashing the PR? Because in that case, we can have more relaxed rules for the commits while you're working on the PR, and then be careful when squashing the PR, which is something that we have control of.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

yes you're right it's only the final squashed commit that matters.


If opening a PR, include the proposed commit message in the PR description.

The commit message type should be one of:

* `feat` / `feature` for feature work.
* `bug` / `fix` for bug fixes.
* `imp` / `improvements` for improvements.
* `doc` / `docs` / `documentation` for any documentation changes.
* `test` / `e2e` for addition or improvements of unit, integration and e2e tests or their corresponding infrastructure.
* `deprecated` for deprecation changes.
* `deps` / `build` for changes to dependencies.
* `chore` / `misc` / `nit` for any miscellaneous changes that don't fit into another category.

**Note**: If any change is breaking, the following format must be used:
* `type` + `(api)!` for api breaking changes, e.g. `fix(api)!: api breaking fix`
colin-axner marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved Hide resolved
* `type` + `(statemachine)!` for state machine breaking changes, e.g. `fix(statemachine)!: state machine breaking fix`
colin-axner marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved Hide resolved

**`api` breaking changes take precedence over `statemachine` breaking changes.**

### Updating Documentation

If you open a PR on ibc-go, it is mandatory to update the relevant documentation in /docs.
Expand Down
4 changes: 4 additions & 0 deletions Makefile
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -171,6 +171,10 @@ view-docs:
@cd docs && \
npm install && npm run serve


changelog:
docker run --rm -v "$$(pwd)"/.git:/app/ -v "$$(pwd)/cliff.toml":/app/cliff.toml orhunp/git-cliff:latest --unreleased --tag $(tag)

.PHONY: build-docs

###############################################################################
Expand Down
119 changes: 119 additions & 0 deletions cliff.toml
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,119 @@
# configuration file for git-cliff (0.1.0)

[changelog]
# changelog header
header = """
<!--
Usage:

Change log entries are generated by git cliff ref: https://github.com/orhun/git-cliff
This can be run using "make changelog tag=vx.y.z"

Each commit should be conventional, the following message groups are supported.

* feat, feature
* imp
* bug, fix
* deprecated
* (api)!
* (statemachine)!

Types of changes (Stanzas):

"Features" for new features. (feat, feature)
"Improvements" for changes in existing functionality. (imp)
"Deprecated" for soon-to-be removed features.
"Bug Fixes" for any bug fixes. (bug, fix)
"API Breaking" for breaking exported APIs used by developers building on SDK. Add (api)! e.g. fix(api)!: api breaking fix
"State Machine Breaking" for any changes that result in a different AppState given the same genesisState and txList. Add (statemachine)! e.g. fix(statemachine)!: state machine breaking fix
Ref: https://keepachangelog.com/en/1.0.0/
-->

# Changelog
All notable changes to this project will be documented in this file.
"""
# template for the changelog body
# https://tera.netlify.app/docs/#introduction
body = """
{% if version %}\
## [{{ version | trim_start_matches(pat="v") }}] - {{ timestamp | date(format="%Y-%m-%d") }}
{% else %}\
## [unreleased]
{% endif %}\
{% for group, commits in commits | group_by(attribute="group") %}
### {{ group | striptags | trim | upper_first }}
{% for commit in commits %}
* {{ commit.message | upper_first }}\
{% endfor %}
{% endfor %}\n
"""
# remove the leading and trailing whitespace from the template
trim = true
# changelog footer
footer = """
<!-- generated by git-cliff -->
"""

[git]
# parse the commits based on https://www.conventionalcommits.org
conventional_commits = true
# filter out the commits that are not conventional
filter_unconventional = true
# process each line of a commit as an individual commit
split_commits = true
# regex for preprocessing the commit messages
commit_preprocessors = [
# A reference to an issue is appened to commits that looks like "(#1234)", this will be replaced
# with a link to that issue, e.g. "[#$1234](https://github.com/cosmos/ibc-go/issues/1234)".
{ pattern = '\((\w+\s)?#([0-9]+)\)', replace = "([#${2}](https://github.com/cosmos/ibc-go/issues/${2}))" },
# any reference to a pr like "pr-1234" will be replaced with a link to the PR.
{ pattern = '\(pr-([0-9]+)\)', replace = "([#${1}](https://github.com/cosmos/ibc-go/pulls/${1}))" },

# the following patterns only exist because "split_commits" is set to true, and we are processesing
# each line of the commit as a separate message.
# these exist to filter out common messages that appear in commit messages that are technically
# conventional, but we do not way to include in the changelog.
{ pattern = '^Signed-off-by:.*', replace='' },
{ pattern = '^Co-authored-by:.*', replace='' },
# don't include references to issues as changelog entries.
{ pattern = '^ref:.*', replace='' },
# exclude CVSS format, CVE can still be included in regular conventinal commits.
{ pattern = 'CVSS:.*', replace='' },
# don't include dependabot auto merge entries.
{ pattern = '.*dependabot-automerge-.*', replace='' },
# don't include statements saying which issue is closed.
{ pattern = '^closes:.*', replace='' },
# remove standalone links in the commit messages.
{ pattern = '^https://.*', replace='' },
# remove lines with html.
{ pattern = '^<.*', replace='' },
]

# regex for parsing and grouping commits
commit_parsers = [
# specifying the number in a comment is a workaround to enable ordering of groups.
# these comments are stripped out of the markdown with the filter "{{ group | striptags | trim | upper_first }}"
# above in the body template.
{ message = "^((?i)deps|(?i)dep|(?i)build)", group = "<!-- 0 -->Dependencies" },
{ message = '^.*\(api\)!', group = "<!-- 1 -->API Breaking" },
{ message = '^.*\(statemachine\)!', group = "<!-- 2 -->State Machine Breaking" },
{ message = "^((?i)improvements|(?i)imp)", group = "<!-- 3 -->Improvements" },
{ message = "^((?i)feature|(?i)feat)", group = "<!-- 4 -->Features" },
{ message = "^((?i)fix|(?i)bug)", group = "<!-- 5 -->Bug Fixes" },
{ message = "^((?i)doc|(?i)docs|(?i)documentation)", group = "<!-- 6 -->Documentation" },
{ message = "^((?i)test|(?i)e2e)", group = "<!-- 7 -->Testing" },
{ message = "^((?i)deprecated)", group = "<!-- 8 -->Deprecated" },
{ message = "^((?i)chore|(?i)misc|(?i)nit)", group = "<!-- 9 -->Miscellaneous Tasks" },
]
# filter out the commits that are not matched by commit parsers
filter_commits = false
# glob pattern for matching git tags
tag_pattern = "v[0-9]*"
# regex for skipping tags
skip_tags = ""
# regex for ignoring tags
ignore_tags = ""
# sort the tags chronologically
date_order = false
# sort the commits inside sections by oldest/newest order
sort_commits = "oldest"