Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: Add tests for acknowledgement.Acknowledgement() #3433

Merged

Conversation

webmaster128
Copy link
Member

Description

Creates unit testing for the binary serialization of acknowledgement.Acknowledgement() to ensure the serialization is complient with the standard and other implementations.

Commit Message / Changelog Entry

type: commit message

see the guidelines for commit messages. (view raw markdown for examples)


Before we can merge this PR, please make sure that all the following items have been
checked off. If any of the checklist items are not applicable, please leave them but
write a little note why.

  • Targeted PR against correct branch (see CONTRIBUTING.md).
  • Linked to Github issue with discussion and accepted design OR link to spec that describes this work.
  • Code follows the module structure standards and Go style guide.
  • Wrote unit and integration tests.
  • Updated relevant documentation (docs/) or specification (x/<module>/spec/).
  • Added relevant godoc comments.
  • Provide a commit message to be used for the changelog entry in the PR description for review.
  • Re-reviewed Files changed in the Github PR explorer.
  • Review Codecov Report in the comment section below once CI passes.

suite.NotPanics(func() {
bz := tc.ack.Acknowledgement()
suite.Require().NotNil(bz)
})
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I moved the check up to the ValidateBasic success case because I don't want to make any assumptions how invalid instances are marchalled. Probybly they should never be marshalled.

Copy link
Member

@damiannolan damiannolan left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good to me, lgtm! Thanks @webmaster128! ❤️

Copy link
Contributor

@charleenfei charleenfei left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm! thanks for this :)

Copy link
Contributor

@colin-axner colin-axner left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks @webmaster128! Appreciate the time you took to better our testing :) ❤️

@colin-axner colin-axner enabled auto-merge (squash) April 13, 2023 08:10
@colin-axner colin-axner merged commit 0e156f1 into cosmos:main Apr 13, 2023
@webmaster128 webmaster128 deleted the test-Acknowledgement.Acknowledgement branch April 13, 2023 08:44
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants