Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add hasInflightPackets. #3836

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Jun 15, 2023
Merged

Conversation

DimitrisJim
Copy link
Contributor

Description

Adds hasInflightPackets to the keeper. Used in both WriteUpgradeAckChannel and the handler for ChanUpgradeOpen

closes: #3816

Commit Message / Changelog Entry

chore: add hasInflightPackets to keeper.

see the guidelines for commit messages. (view raw markdown for examples)


Before we can merge this PR, please make sure that all the following items have been
checked off. If any of the checklist items are not applicable, please leave them but
write a little note why.

  • Targeted PR against correct branch (see CONTRIBUTING.md).
  • Linked to Github issue with discussion and accepted design OR link to spec that describes this work.
  • Code follows the module structure standards and Go style guide.
  • Wrote unit and integration tests.
  • Updated relevant documentation (docs/) or specification (x/<module>/spec/).
  • Added relevant godoc comments.
  • Provide a commit message to be used for the changelog entry in the PR description for review.
  • Re-reviewed Files changed in the Github PR explorer.
  • Review Codecov Report in the comment section below once CI passes.

@@ -570,3 +570,14 @@ func (k Keeper) iterateHashes(ctx sdk.Context, iterator db.Iterator, cb func(por
}
}
}

// hasInflightPackets returns true if there are packet commitments stored at the specified channel and
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think its small enough to be tested indirectly by the places that call it but can add it to export_test and write a small test for it.

Copy link
Contributor

@chatton chatton left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM! I'm happy with indirect testing.

Copy link
Contributor

@charleenfei charleenfei left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

agreed indirect testing is fine, thanks for this :)

@crodriguezvega crodriguezvega merged commit c769d22 into 04-channel-upgrades Jun 15, 2023
@crodriguezvega crodriguezvega deleted the has_inflight_packets branch June 15, 2023 10:07
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants