Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

perf(ante): Make the redundancy ante-handler check not run recvpacket middleware #6248

Conversation

ValarDragon
Copy link
Contributor

@ValarDragon ValarDragon commented May 1, 2024

Description

Make the redundancy ante handler check not run the recvpacket middleware.

Second biggest component of #6232

Please let me know if theres tests that would be desired for this. Feel free to close if theres another way you'd like to achieve the result!


Before we can merge this PR, please make sure that all the following items have been
checked off. If any of the checklist items are not applicable, please leave them but
write a little note why.

  • Targeted PR against the correct branch (see CONTRIBUTING.md).
  • Linked to GitHub issue with discussion and accepted design, OR link to spec that describes this work.
  • Code follows the module structure standards and Go style guide.
  • Wrote unit and integration tests.
  • Updated relevant documentation (docs/).
  • Added relevant godoc comments.
  • Provide a conventional commit message to follow the repository standards.
  • Include a descriptive changelog entry when appropriate. This may be left to the discretion of the PR reviewers. (e.g. chores should be omitted from changelog)
  • Re-reviewed Files changed in the GitHub PR explorer.
  • Review SonarCloud Report in the comment section below once CI passes.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Improved redundancy check logic for packet reception to enhance system reliability.
  • Refactor

    • Renamed variables and adjusted logic in the AnteHandle function of the RedundantRelayDecorator for better packet handling.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented May 1, 2024

Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The changes aim to optimize the handling of redundant relay operations in the IBC module by refining logic and enhancing checks for non-redundancy in packet receptions. This includes renaming variables for clarity and adjusting conditions to streamline processes.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
.../core/ante/ante.go Renamed response to redundant and modified redundancy check logic.
.../core/keeper/msg_server.go Added a function to check non-redundancy in received packets.

Possibly related issues


Recent Review Details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yml
Review profile: CHILL

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 079a3ea and 6029be0.
Files selected for processing (1)
  • modules/core/keeper/msg_server.go (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • modules/core/keeper/msg_server.go

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger a review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 2

default:
return false, errorsmod.Wrap(err, "receive packet verification failed")
}
return false, nil
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Incorrect return value in RecvPacketCheckNonRedundant.

- return false, nil
+ return true, nil

This function should return true, nil when no error occurs and the packet is non-redundant, as per the intended logic described in the comments and switch-case handling.


Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation.

Suggested change
return false, nil
return true, nil

Comment on lines +33 to +37
redundant, err := rrd.k.RecvPacketCheckNonRedundant(ctx, msg)
if err != nil {
return ctx, err
}
if response.Result == channeltypes.NOOP {
if redundant {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Tip

Codebase Verification

The verification process has confirmed the presence and implementation of the RecvPacketCheckNonRedundant function within the modules/core/keeper/msg_server.go file. The function is designed to handle errors appropriately, as evidenced by the detailed error handling and conditional logic present in the function's implementation.

However, the verification process did not find any test cases specifically targeting the RecvPacketCheckNonRedundant function. This absence of direct test coverage could pose risks, especially considering the function's role in handling packet redundancy checks, which are critical for the system's integrity and performance.

Given this situation, it is recommended to implement dedicated test cases to ensure the robustness and correctness of the RecvPacketCheckNonRedundant function under various scenarios, including error conditions and edge cases.

Action Points:

  • Implement test cases for RecvPacketCheckNonRedundant to cover various scenarios and error conditions.
  • Review the existing test suite to ensure that indirect coverage, if any, is sufficient until specific tests are developed.
Analysis chain

Integration of RecvPacketCheckNonRedundant looks good, but ensure thorough testing of error scenarios.

Scripts Executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that the `RecvPacketCheckNonRedundant` function is properly integrated and handles errors correctly.

# Search for the function definition and usage in the codebase to ensure it's correctly implemented and called.
ast-grep --lang go --pattern $'func (k *Keeper) RecvPacketCheckNonRedundant($_, $_) ($_,$_)' modules/core/keeper/msg_server.go

# Search for test cases covering this function.
rg --files-with-matches --type go $'RecvPacketCheckNonRedundant' | xargs rg 'func Test.*RecvPacketCheckNonRedundant'

Length of output: 2667

@colin-axner
Copy link
Contributor

#6280 and #6302 will cover the proposed improvements in this pr. Thanks @ValarDragon!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
priority PRs that need prompt reviews
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants