-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 587
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
perf(ante): Make the redundancy ante-handler check not run recvpacket middleware #6248
perf(ante): Make the redundancy ante-handler check not run recvpacket middleware #6248
Conversation
WalkthroughWalkthroughThe changes aim to optimize the handling of redundant relay operations in the IBC module by refining logic and enhancing checks for non-redundancy in packet receptions. This includes renaming variables for clarity and adjusting conditions to streamline processes. Changes
Possibly related issues
Recent Review DetailsConfiguration used: .coderabbit.yml Files selected for processing (1)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 2
default: | ||
return false, errorsmod.Wrap(err, "receive packet verification failed") | ||
} | ||
return false, nil |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Incorrect return value in RecvPacketCheckNonRedundant
.
- return false, nil
+ return true, nil
This function should return true, nil
when no error occurs and the packet is non-redundant, as per the intended logic described in the comments and switch-case handling.
Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation.
return false, nil | |
return true, nil |
redundant, err := rrd.k.RecvPacketCheckNonRedundant(ctx, msg) | ||
if err != nil { | ||
return ctx, err | ||
} | ||
if response.Result == channeltypes.NOOP { | ||
if redundant { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Tip
Codebase Verification
The verification process has confirmed the presence and implementation of the RecvPacketCheckNonRedundant
function within the modules/core/keeper/msg_server.go
file. The function is designed to handle errors appropriately, as evidenced by the detailed error handling and conditional logic present in the function's implementation.
However, the verification process did not find any test cases specifically targeting the RecvPacketCheckNonRedundant
function. This absence of direct test coverage could pose risks, especially considering the function's role in handling packet redundancy checks, which are critical for the system's integrity and performance.
Given this situation, it is recommended to implement dedicated test cases to ensure the robustness and correctness of the RecvPacketCheckNonRedundant
function under various scenarios, including error conditions and edge cases.
Action Points:
- Implement test cases for
RecvPacketCheckNonRedundant
to cover various scenarios and error conditions. - Review the existing test suite to ensure that indirect coverage, if any, is sufficient until specific tests are developed.
Analysis chain
Integration of RecvPacketCheckNonRedundant
looks good, but ensure thorough testing of error scenarios.
Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that the `RecvPacketCheckNonRedundant` function is properly integrated and handles errors correctly.
# Search for the function definition and usage in the codebase to ensure it's correctly implemented and called.
ast-grep --lang go --pattern $'func (k *Keeper) RecvPacketCheckNonRedundant($_, $_) ($_,$_)' modules/core/keeper/msg_server.go
# Search for test cases covering this function.
rg --files-with-matches --type go $'RecvPacketCheckNonRedundant' | xargs rg 'func Test.*RecvPacketCheckNonRedundant'
Length of output: 2667
#6280 and #6302 will cover the proposed improvements in this pr. Thanks @ValarDragon! |
Description
Make the redundancy ante handler check not run the recvpacket middleware.
Second biggest component of #6232
Please let me know if theres tests that would be desired for this. Feel free to close if theres another way you'd like to achieve the result!
Before we can merge this PR, please make sure that all the following items have been
checked off. If any of the checklist items are not applicable, please leave them but
write a little note why.
docs/
).godoc
comments.Files changed
in the GitHub PR explorer.SonarCloud Report
in the comment section below once CI passes.Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Refactor
AnteHandle
function of theRedundantRelayDecorator
for better packet handling.