-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 629
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
refactor: update IncentivzedAck + add channeltype helpers for Ack #749
refactor: update IncentivzedAck + add channeltype helpers for Ack #749
Conversation
… helpers for unpack/pack Any
|
||
// UnpackAcknowledgement unpacks an Any into an Acknowledgement. It returns an error if the | ||
// acknowledgement can't be unpacked into a Acknowledgement. | ||
func UnpackAcknowledgement(any *codectypes.Any) (exported.Acknowledgement, error) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@colin-axner I will make a follow-up PR with these changes into main if we decide to go this route.
modules/apps/29-fee/keeper/relay.go
Outdated
@@ -23,8 +23,15 @@ func (k Keeper) WriteAcknowledgement(ctx sdk.Context, chanCap *capabilitytypes.C | |||
|
|||
k.DeleteForwardRelayerAddress(ctx, packetId) | |||
|
|||
ack := types.NewIncentivizedAcknowledgement(relayer, acknowledgement) | |||
bz := ack.Acknowledgement() | |||
ack := channeltypes.Acknowledgement{} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@AdityaSripal Is this what you meant?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
update the WriteAcknowledgement API to take in exported.Acknowledgement and then the code will look good
I have made this a draft PR for now as I'm unsure if this is the approach we want to take and I would like some early feedback. I have added @colin-axner @damiannolan feedback appreciated. |
// IncentivizedAcknowledgement is the acknowledgement format to be used by applications wrapped in the fee middleware | ||
// It contains the raw acknowledgement bytes, as well as the forward relayer address | ||
message IncentivizedAcknowledgement { | ||
bytes result = 1; | ||
google.protobuf.Any app_acknowledgement = 1 [(gogoproto.moretags) = "yaml:\"forward_relayer_address\""]; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
yaml tag is incorrect
@@ -16,7 +19,12 @@ func NewIncentivizedAcknowledgement(relayer string, ack []byte) IncentivizedAckn | |||
// considered successful if the forward relayer address is empty. Otherwise it is | |||
// considered a failed acknowledgement. | |||
func (ack IncentivizedAcknowledgement) Success() bool { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think IncentivizedAcknowledgement needs to implement UnpackInterfaces. It might be best to write a test first to determine if this is true. UnpackInterfaces is used when JSON marshalling/unmarshalling an Any. That's why we have this test case
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I have implemented this but it seems to not be working 🤔 Getting some failed tests for the reason you mention here.
modules/apps/29-fee/keeper/relay.go
Outdated
@@ -23,8 +23,15 @@ func (k Keeper) WriteAcknowledgement(ctx sdk.Context, chanCap *capabilitytypes.C | |||
|
|||
k.DeleteForwardRelayerAddress(ctx, packetId) | |||
|
|||
ack := types.NewIncentivizedAcknowledgement(relayer, acknowledgement) | |||
bz := ack.Acknowledgement() | |||
ack := channeltypes.Acknowledgement{} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
update the WriteAcknowledgement API to take in exported.Acknowledgement and then the code will look good
Closing in favor of : #952 |
Description
closes: #XXXX
Before we can merge this PR, please make sure that all the following items have been
checked off. If any of the checklist items are not applicable, please leave them but
write a little note why.
docs/
) or specification (x/<module>/spec/
)godoc
comments.Unreleased
section inCHANGELOG.md
Files changed
in the Github PR explorerCodecov Report
in the comment section below once CI passes