Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Produce 3.2.0 from main branch #6753

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Apr 5, 2024
Merged

Produce 3.2.0 from main branch #6753

merged 4 commits into from
Apr 5, 2024

Conversation

bbrks
Copy link
Member

@bbrks bbrks commented Apr 3, 2024 •
edited
Loading

  • Produce 3.2 builds from main branch
    • main is identical to master, minus the 4 serverless commits (now in feature/serverless)
  • Remove 3.3 build config
  • Add main in CI config

⚠️ Post-merge ⚠️

  • Make master branch read-only (same rules as old beryllium branch)
  • Change default branch in GitHub to main from master
  • Change Jenkins jobs building from master (e.g. The automated post-merge Integration test job)
  • Notify build team of default branch change for awareness

Integration Tests

@bbrks bbrks self-assigned this Apr 3, 2024
@bbrks bbrks force-pushed the 3.2-main-build-setup branch from e14560c to f06fe49 Compare April 4, 2024 14:53
torcolvin
torcolvin approved these changes Apr 5, 2024
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Collaborator

@torcolvin torcolvin left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, missing a9811cd

@bbrks
Copy link
Member Author

bbrks commented Apr 5, 2024

Just cherry-picked that into main to bring it back up to date.

@adamcfraser adamcfraser merged commit 1879730 into main Apr 5, 2024
17 checks passed
@adamcfraser adamcfraser deleted the 3.2-main-build-setup branch April 5, 2024 22:59
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@torcolvin torcolvin torcolvin approved these changes

Assignees

@bbrks bbrks

Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
3 participants
@bbrks @torcolvin @adamcfraser