feat(base): add base chain support

[alfetopito]

Summary

Initial Base chain support.

Still not 100% functional as backend/solvers are not 100% up.
It has a feature flag so should be safe to merge even without full support.

To Test

1. Full app test on Base network

[vercel]

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name	Status	Preview	Updated (UTC)
cosmos	✅ Ready (Inspect)	Visit Preview	Nov 7, 2024 4:23pm
cowfi	✅ Ready (Inspect)	Visit Preview	Nov 7, 2024 4:23pm
explorer-dev	✅ Ready (Inspect)	Visit Preview	Nov 7, 2024 4:23pm
swap-dev	✅ Ready (Inspect)	Visit Preview	Nov 7, 2024 4:23pm
widget-configurator	✅ Ready (Inspect)	Visit Preview	Nov 7, 2024 4:23pm

[socket-security]

👍 Dependency issues cleared. Learn more about Socket for GitHub ↗︎

This PR previously contained dependency changes with security issues that have been resolved, removed, or ignored.

View full report↗︎

[elena-zh]

Hey @alfetopito , great job!
I've found some issues/improvements, most of them we discussed in this thread. I will list here some new ones and some questions that would be nice to address later (not to forget about it):

1. (nitpick) On Explorer, the chain color looks very similar to the one we use for Arbitrum. Might it be changed a bit?
   

2. Surplus tooltip: it would be great to change a date for 'November 2024' (or December)
   

3. There is no validation on a minimum chunk size for a TWAP order

4. In general, AFAIU, TWAP orders are not working yet

5. (might be an edge case): I created a TWAP order along with Safe modification in 1 TX, but the warning remained to be displayed until I refreshed the page. Order creation TX was signed with sponsored funds by Safe (e.g. not executed though connected wallet). Could you please check whether the same issue happens to you?
   

6. Is this OK that a limit price may be slighty recalculated on an order placement? See, I set it to 27, but the order shows 29.0051
   

7. (does not work yet): Hooks simulation fails in Base (will be fixed when bff changes are merged)

8. (discuss later): Hooks support in Base (not working)
   

9. (discuss later): COW token liquidity in Base

10. (discuss later): CoW AMM pools in Base

[alfetopito]

Hey @alfetopito , great job! I've found some issues/improvements, most of them we discussed in this thread. I will list here some new ones and some questions that would be nice to address later (not to forget about it):

1. (nitpick) On Explorer, the chain color looks very similar to the one we use for Arbitrum. Might it be changed a bit?
   ![diff color](https://private-user-images.githubusercontent.com/70885163/383962379-c3b19a66-aab4-4c5b-8614-1d50c4f7b599.png?jwt=eyJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiIsInR5cCI6IkpXVCJ9.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.OzBn1f0P8Je0jrt32XvdOwQdHpE7oSCG3vE0I4sfmAE)

The color code was taken from their brand guide https://github.com/base-org/brand-kit.
Can't help it if it's too close to Arbitrum's brand color 🤷

2. Surplus tooltip: it would be great to change a date for 'November 2024' (or December)
   ![now](https://private-user-images.githubusercontent.com/70885163/383962657-b4c6f4cb-eb43-4170-946b-861b020f6f5c.png?jwt=eyJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiIsInR5cCI6IkpXVCJ9.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.hrFko4_eBg13SlBDVMApVg-c3DIf8Z9kUv7AOSbBuP8)

Fixed

3. There is no validation on a minimum chunk size for a TWAP order

It was a bug, fixed.

4. In general, AFAIU, TWAP orders are not working yet

Correct, we need backend PROD to be up first.

5. (might be an edge case): I created a TWAP order along with Safe modification in 1 TX, but the warning remained to be displayed until I refreshed the page. Order creation TX was signed with sponsored funds by Safe (e.g. not executed though connected wallet). Could you please check whether the same issue happens to you?
   ![image](https://private-user-images.githubusercontent.com/70885163/383963311-eb9cbf10-f4fb-4e49-85b7-f3cc81496690.png?jwt=eyJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiIsInR5cCI6IkpXVCJ9.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._xE8hCSmEskYYSEaKpquKqTXKkxFYZu06Tw7VTmYkm8)

6. Is this OK that a limit price may be slighty recalculated on an order placement? See, I set it to 27, but the [order ](https://explorer-dev-git-feat-base-cowswap.vercel.app/base/orders/0xab351c233b5784059edb161b0586eed57a9339c4bc0ecb54033cfb214ee3d32c9fa3c00a92ec5f96b1ad2527ab41b3932efeda58672c9f0e?tab=overview) shows 29.0051
   ![image](https://private-user-images.githubusercontent.com/70885163/383965753-d76c58bb-b1ea-46af-b63e-2c9fb990664e.png?jwt=eyJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiIsInR5cCI6IkpXVCJ9.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.Ddvw0Rq9bUhZGXDnHyIMFhZjt5NhIL2masi7tTcVNKk)

Shouldn't be. Does this happen only on Base?

7. (does not work yet): Hooks simulation fails in Base (will be fixed when bff changes are merged)

8. (discuss later): Hooks support in Base (not working)
   ![image](https://private-user-images.githubusercontent.com/70885163/383964607-70a55f2c-896c-40a6-82c9-edc96240b4e4.png?jwt=eyJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiIsInR5cCI6IkpXVCJ9.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.nLqlmYRKuZ6IUMJCPOMQMhkr7WTzObOwNPcwCGgZygQ)

9. (discuss later): COW token [liquidity ](https://cowservices.slack.com/archives/C06G1E3AU77/p1729784468627909)in Base

10. (discuss later): [CoW AMM pools](https://cowservices.slack.com/archives/C07M5DZHMHC/p1730450112639629) in Base

[socket-security]

Report too large to display inline

View full report↗︎

[elena-zh]

Hey @alfetopito ,

2. Surplus tooltip: it would be great to change a date for 'November 2024' (or December)

Fixed

Looks good

3. There is no validation on a minimum chunk size for a TWAP order

It was a bug, fixed.

Unfortunately, not fixed

Shouldn't be. Does this happen only on Base?

No :( It is a regression bug. I've opened #5077 task for this.

Thanks!