npm i inline-try
A javascript library for an inline try, offering readability, ergonomics, convenience, and safety.
- Readability:
itry
results in less code, less nesting, less branching. - Ergonomics:
itry
results in code that feels ergonmic, and not like you are fighting against the language (eg, with early declaring a let to avoid scoping issues in the try). - Convienence:
itry
allows you to declaratively specify errors, rather than you having to tediously match them. - Safety:
itry
forces you to specify which error types to catch which ensures against overcatching.
Judge for yourself in the comparison ⬇️
With inline-try
:
const getArticleEndpoint = async (req, res) => {
const [article, resultError] = await itry(getArticle(slug), ResultError);
if (resultError) {
return res.sendStatus(404);
}
await article.incrementReadCount();
res.json(article.serializeForAPI());
};
Without inline-try
:
const getArticleEndpoint = (req, res) => {
// We have to deal with scoping issues
let article;
// And deeper nesting
try {
article = await getArticle(slug);
} catch (error) {
// And remember to check the error
if (error instanceof ResultError) {
return res.sendStatus(404);
}
// And to re-throw the error if not our type
throw error;
}
article.incrementReadCount();
res.json(article.serializeForAPI());
};
inline-try
works with both async and sync code.
Wrap a promise with itry
and provide error types you want to catch, and you'll receive an array you can unpack to those values, with the appropriate one defined.
If error types are provided, and the promise rejects with one not specified, it will be thrown.
const { itry } = require('inline-try');
const [data, fooError] = await itry(promise, FooError);
// If the promise resolves, data will be defined.
// If the promise rejects with a FooError, fooError will be defined.
// If the promise rejects with any other error, the await will throw.
const [data, typeError, myError] = await itry(promise, TypeError, MyError);
// If the promise resolves, data will be defined.
// If the promise rejects with a TypeError, typeError will be defined.
// If the promise rejects with a FooError, fooError will be defined.
// If the promise rejects with any other error, the await will throw.
If no error types are provided, all errors will be caught.
const [data, error] = await itry(promise);
// If the promise resolves, data will be defined.
// If the promise rejects, error will be defined.
// The await will never throw an error.
Note that with async functions you await the itry
and call the function in the itry
parameter list (since async functions enclose success and failure data in the returned promise).
Wrap a function with itry
and provide error type(s) you want to catch, and you'll receive an array you can unpack to those values, with the appropriate one defined.
If error types are provided, and the function throws with one not specified, it will be thrown.
const { itry } = require('inline-try');
const [data, fooError] = itry(someFn, FooError);
// If someFn returns successfully, data will be defined.
// If someFn throws a FooError, fooError will be defined.
// If someFn throws any other error, the itry will throw.
// Supports any amount of errors to match
const [data, typeError, fooError] = itry(someFn, TypeError, FooError);
// If someFn returns successfully, data will be defined.
// If someFn throws a TypeError, typeError will be defined.
// If someFn throws a FooError, fooError will be defined.
// If someFn throws any other error, the itry will throw.
As a special case, if no error types are provided, all errors will be caught.
const [data, error] = itry(someFn);
// If someFn returns successfully, data will be defined.
// If someFn throws, error will be defined.
// The itry will never throw an error.
Note that with sync code you do not call the function - it will be (and needs to be) invoked by inline-try
. If your function takes parameters, you can wrap the function in an anonymous arrow function, or wrap any arbitrary code in a function like this. For example:
const [data, fooError] = itry(() => someFn(1, 2, 3), FooError);
const getArticleEndpoint = async (req, res) => {
// This code is short and readable, and is specific with errors it's catching
const [article, resultError] = await itry(getArticle(slug), ResultError);
if (resultError) {
return res.sendStatus(404);
}
await article.incrementReadCount();
res.json(article.serializeForAPI());
};
Without inline-try
there may be a temptation to write this:
const getArticleEndpoint = async (req, res) => {
// This code looks short and readable, but is not equivalent.
try {
const article = await getArticle(slug);
await article.incrementReadCount();
const json = article.serializeForAPI();
res.status(200).json(json);
} catch (error) {
// This is catching too much code. If the increment or serialize methods
// fail, a 404 is confusingly sent and developer time wasted going down
// the wrong path of looking into the article and slug and get method,
// when really it could be the other methods.
res.sendStatus(404);
}
};
which is catching too much code. And if realized, may then become:
const getArticleEndpoint = (req, res) => {
// This code feels like it is working against the language -
// declaring a variable ahead of time to escape a scoping issue
// of having to attempt our function in a try block - but is correct.
let article;
try {
article = await getArticle(slug);
} catch (error) {
// This is still too broad, and could errantly send a 404 for other
// types of errors (for example a simple typo in the getArticle,
// which if it were sync would blow up right away, but since it
// is async now bubbles up here) again potentially wasting developer
// time going down the wrong path of looking into the article and slug.
return res.sendStatus(404);
}
article.incrementReadCount();
res.json(article.serializeForAPI());
}
which is better, but still catching too broadly - and especially in the case of async code (where simple programing typos/mistakes/errors do not blow up the program, but get passed along with the rejection path and so neccesitates really strict analysis of these errors).
And so we'd finally get to the equivalent code:
const getArticleEndpoint = (req, res) => {
// This code feels like it is working against the language -
// declaring a variable ahead of time to escape a scoping issue
// of having to attempt our function in a try block - but is correct.
let article;
try {
article = await getArticle(slug);
} catch (error) {
// We remember to check the error
if (error instanceof ResultError) {
// and to early return
return res.sendStatus(404);
}
// and to re-throw the error if not our type
throw error;
}
article.incrementReadCount();
res.json(article.serializeForAPI());
};
Error types can also be passed to the itry
function as an array, rather than as
separate parameters. This can make the code look nicer when formatted.
const [data, typeError, myError] = await itry(
someAsyncFunctionThatIsKindaLong(oh, and, has, some, params),
[TypeError, MyError]
);
In addtion to the itry
function described above, inline-try
includes two other utility helpers for working with async code.
Swallow returns the value the function / resolution of promise, or else a default value you provide. It will never throw an error. It may also take a function that is called with the error.
const { swallow } = require('inline-try');
const { logError } = require('./logging');
// With Async Functions
const greeting = await swallow(getGreeting(), 'Hey There!', logError);
// If the promise resolves, greeting will be the value.
// If the promise rejects, greeting will be "Hey There!" and logError will be called with the error.
// The await will never throw an error.
// With Sync Functions
const greeting = swallow(getGreeting, 'Hey There!', logError);
// If the function returns successfully, greeting will be the value.
// If the function throws, greeting will be "Hey There!" and logError will be called with the error.
// The swallow will never throw an error.
tapError
is a function that is called with the error only if the function throws / promise rejects. It does not handle the error - the original error is received, but allows some side effect on that error. This is useful when an error traverses through many "layers" in the program (EG, db -> dao -> service -> controller), and each layer may easily perform side-effects regarding what the error means for it without needing to account for its journey.
const { tapError } = require('inline-try');
// With Async Functions
const getOne = data => tapError(db.one(data), logError);
// If the promise resolves, the value will be returned.
// If the promise rejects, the rejected promise will be returned but with the error already logged.
// With Sync Functions
const getOne = data => tapError(() => sync.one(data), logError);
// If the function returns successfully, the value will be returned.
// If the function throws an error, the error will be returned but with the error already logged.
fAwait
which this was based on, but only focused on async code for promises/await (and did not also support sync functions).- Conception: Making Await More Functional in JavaScript